scholarly journals Simplified Lateral Torsional Buckling (LTB) Analysis of Glass Fins with Continuous Lateral Restraints at the Tensioned Edge

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-21
Author(s):  
Chiara Bedon

Within multiple design challenges, the lateral torsional buckling (LTB) analysis and stability check of structural glass members is a well-known issue for design. Typical examples can be found not only in glass slabs with slender bracing members but also in facades and walls, where glass fins are used to brace the vertical panels against input pressures. Design loads such as wind suction give place to possible LTB of fins with LR at the tensioned edge and thus require dedicated tools. In the present investigation, the LTB analysis of structural glass fins that are intended to act as bracers for facade panels and restrained via continuous, flexible joints acting as lateral restraints (LRs) is addressed. Geometrically simplified but refined numerical models developed in Abaqus are used to perform a wide parametric study and validate the proposed analytical formulations. Special care is spent for the prediction of the elastic critical buckling moment with LRs, given that it represents the first fundamental parameter for buckling design. However, the LR stiffness and resistance on the one side and the geometrical/mechanical features of the LR glass members on the other side are mutually affected in the final LTB prediction. In the case of laminated glass (LG) members composed of two or more glass panels, moreover, further design challenges arise from the bonding level of the constituent layers. A simplified but rational analytical procedure is thus presented in this paper to support the development of a conservative and standardized LTB stability check for glass fins with LR at the tensioned edge.

Materials ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (11) ◽  
pp. 2492 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dario Santo ◽  
Silvana Mattei ◽  
Chiara Bedon

Structural glass beams and fins are largely used in buildings, in the form of primary load-bearing members and bracing systems for roof or facade panels. Several loading and boundary conditions can be efficiently solved by means of bonded composites that involve the use of laminated glass sections. Additionally, the so-obtained glass members are often characterized by high slenderness. To this aim, several literature studies were dedicated to the lateral–torsional buckling (LTB) behavior of laterally unrestrained (LU) glass elements, with the support of full-scale experiments, analytical models, or finite element (FE) numerical investigations. Standardized design recommendations for LU glass members in LTB are available for designers. However, several design issues still require “ad hoc” (and often expensive) calculation studies. In most of the cases, for example, the mechanical interaction between the structural components to verify involves various typologies of joints, including continuous sealant connections, mechanical point fixings, or hybrid solutions. As a result, an accurate estimation of the theoretical LTB critical moment for such a kind of laterally restrained (LR) element represents a first key issue toward the definition and calibration of generalized design recommendations. Careful consideration should be spent for the description of the intrinsic features of materials in use, as well as for a combination of geometrical and mechanical aspects (i.e., geometry, number, position of restraints, etc.). In this paper, the attention is focused on the calculation of the elastic critical buckling moment of LR glass beams in LTB. Existing analytical approaches of the literature (mostly developed for steel constructional members) are briefly recalled. An additional advantage for extended parametric calculations is then taken from finite element (FE) numerical analyses, which are performed via the LTBeam or the ABAQUS software codes. The actual role and the effect of discrete mechanical restraints are, thus, explored for selected configurations of practical interest. Finally, the reliability of simplified calculation approaches is assessed.


2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (07) ◽  
pp. 1950079 ◽  
Author(s):  
João Victor Fragoso Dias ◽  
Janaina Pena Soares Oliveira ◽  
Adenilcia Fernanda Grobério Calenzani ◽  
Ricardo Hallal Fakury

Great attention has been given in the last few years to steel–concrete composite beams due to the gains in strength that can be obtained with the small cost of installing a shear connection between the steel profile and the concrete slab. In continuous and semicontinuous composite beams close to the internal supports, hogging bending moments are developed and the compressed bottom flange may buckle laterally in an unstable way known as the lateral-distortional buckling, characterized by a horizontal displacement and twist of the bottom flange with an out-of-plane distortion of the web. In the literature, several formulations were proposed to determine the critical moment for this type of buckling. Among them, some of the most relevant are presented by [K. Roik, G. Hanswille and J. Kina, Solution for the lateral torsional buckling problem of composite beams (in German), Stahlbau 59 (1990)] and [G. Hanswille, J. Lindner and D. Munich, Lateral torsional buckling of composite beams (in German), Stahlbau 67 (1998)]. In the present work, a new procedure is developed to determine the elastic critical moment of lateral–distortional buckling of composite beams under uniform hogging moment. To assess and calibrate this procedure, 7[Formula: see text]772 numerical models were analyzed by the finite element code ANSYS and the results were compared with the ones obtained from the new proposed formulas. The procedure presented excellent agreement with the numerical results, with an average deviation of 2.33% from the computational simulations. The formulations of [K. Roik, G. Hanswille and J. Kina, Solution for the lateral torsional buckling problem of composite beams (in German), Stahlbau 59 (1990)] and [G. Hanswille, J. Lindner and D. Munich, Lateral torsional buckling of composite beams (in German), Stahlbau 67 (1998)] did not lead to such satisfactory results, presenting an average deviation of 12.41% and 16.51%, respectively.


Stahlbau ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 77 (4) ◽  
pp. 247-256 ◽  
Author(s):  
H.H. (Bert) Snijder ◽  
J.C.D. (Hans) Hoenderkamp ◽  
M.C.M. (Monique) Bakker ◽  
H.M.G.M. (Henri) Steenbergen ◽  
C.H.M. (Karin) de Louw

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document