scholarly journals Clinical Outcome and Biomechanical Analysis of Dynamic Hip Screw Combined with Derotation Screw in Treating Displaced Femoral Neck Fractures Based on Different Reduction Qualities in Young Patients (≤65 Years of Age)

2022 ◽  
Vol 2022 ◽  
pp. 1-15
Author(s):  
Jian Zhu ◽  
Yonglong Li ◽  
Yingze Zhang ◽  
Xiaodong Cheng
Keyword(s):  
Femoral Neck ◽  
Internal Fixation ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Young Patients ◽  
Femoral Neck Fractures ◽  
Harris Hip Score ◽  
Surgical Time ◽  
Displaced Femoral Neck Fractures ◽  
Reduction Group ◽  
Hip Screw

Objective. To examine the clinical results and biomechanical mechanism of the dynamic hip screw (DHS) and derotation screw (DS) in the treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures (FNF) based on different reduction qualities in young patients (≤65 years of age). Methods. All patients with FNF who received closed reduction and internal fixation with DHS+DS from January 2014 to August 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Data on demographics, surgery, clinical outcomes, and postoperative complications were collected. According to the reduction quality immediately after surgery, all patients were categorized into the positive buttress reduction group (PBRG) and the anatomical reduction group (ARG). The complications and clinical outcomes were compared between the two groups. Meanwhile, the biomechanical mechanism of different reduction qualities was further analyzed with finite element analysis (FEA). The distribution of von Mises stress, the peak stress of internal fixation, and the displacement of the proximal fragment were compared between the two groups. Results. A total of 68 patients were included in our study. Among them, 31 were divided into the PBRG while 37 were in the ARG. The surgical time and fluoroscopy time were significantly shorter in the PBRG than in the ARG ( p < 0.05 ). The degree of femoral neck shortening and the varus change of the femoral-neck shaft angle were lower in the PBRG compared to the ARG ( p < 0.05 ). The excellent-good rate of the Harris hip score was higher in the PBRG compared to the ARG (83.9% vs. 64.8%). The FEA results demonstrated that the stress of DHS+CS and the downward displacement of the proximal femoral neck fragment were greater in the ARG than in the PBRG. Conclusion. For displaced FNF with difficulty to achieve reduction, DHS+CS combined with positive buttress reduction was an effective treatment in young patients due to better mechanical support, shorter surgical time, less radiation exposure, and higher excellent-good rate of Harris hip score.

Displaced femoral neck fractures in patients 60 years of age or younger: results of internal fixation with the dynamic locking blade plate

2018 ◽  
Vol 100-B (4) ◽  
pp. 443-449 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. H. Kalsbeek ◽  
A. D. P. van Walsum ◽  
J. P. A. M. Vroemen ◽  
H. M. J. Janzing ◽  
J. T. Winkelhorst ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Femoral Neck ◽  
Internal Fixation ◽  
Fracture Healing ◽  
Avascular Necrosis ◽  
Young Patients ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Neuromuscular Disorder ◽  
Femoral Neck Fractures ◽  
Blade Plate ◽  
Displaced Femoral Neck Fractures

AimsThe objective of this study was to investigate bone healing after internal fixation of displaced femoral neck fractures (FNFs) with the Dynamic Locking Blade Plate (DLBP) in a young patient population treated by various orthopaedic (trauma) surgeons.Patients and MethodsWe present a multicentre prospective case series with a follow-up of one year. All patients aged ≤ 60 years with a displaced FNF treated with the DLBP between 1st August 2010 and December 2014 were included. Patients with pathological fractures, concomitant fractures of the lower limb, symptomatic arthritis, local infection or inflammation, inadequate local tissue coverage, or any mental or neuromuscular disorder were excluded. Primary outcome measure was failure in fracture healing due to nonunion, avascular necrosis, or implant failure requiring revision surgery.ResultsIn total, 106 consecutive patients (mean age 52 years, range 23 to 60; 46% (49/106) female) were included. The failure rate was 14 of 106 patients (13.2%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 7.1 to 19.9). Avascular necrosis occurred in 11 patients (10.4%), nonunion in six (5.6%), and loss of fixation in two (1.9%).ConclusionThe rate of fracture healing after DLBP fixation of displaced femoral neck fracture in young patients is promising and warrants further investigation by a randomized trial to compare the performance against other contemporary methods of fixation. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:443–9.

scholarly journals Uncemented versus cemented arthroplasty after metal-on-metal total hip replacement in patients with femoral neck fractures: a retrospective study

2021 ◽  
Vol 49 (5) ◽  
pp. 030006052110122
Author(s):  
Wenlu Liu ◽  
Huanyi Lin ◽  
Xianshang Zeng ◽  
Meiji Chen ◽  
Weiwei Tang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Femoral Neck ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Total Hip Replacement ◽  
Hip Replacement ◽  
Femoral Neck Fractures ◽  
Harris Hip Score ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Metal On Metal

Objective To compare the clinical outcomes of primary metal-on-metal total hip replacement (MoM-TR) converted to uncemented total hip replacement (UTR) or cemented total hip replacement (CTR) in patients with femoral neck fractures (AO/OTA: 31B/C). Methods Patient data of 234 UTR or CTR revisions after primary MoM-TR failure from March 2007 to January 2018 were retrospectively identified. Clinical outcomes, including the Harris hip score (HHS) and key orthopaedic complications, were collected at 3, 6, and 12 months following conversion and every 12 months thereafter. Results The mean follow-up was 84.12 (67–100) months for UTR and 84.23 (66–101) months for CTR. At the last follow-up, the HHS was better in the CTR- than UTR-treated patients. Noteworthy dissimilarities were correspondingly detected in the key orthopaedic complication rates (16.1% for CTR vs. 47.4% for UTR). Statistically significant differences in specific orthopaedic complications were also detected in the re-revision rate (10.3% for UTR vs. 2.5% for CTR), prosthesis loosening rate (16.3% for UTR vs. 5.9% for CTR), and periprosthetic fracture rate (12.0% for UTR vs. 4.2% for CTR). Conclusion In the setting of revision of failed primary MoM-TR, CTR may demonstrate advantages over UTR in improving functional outcomes and reducing key orthopaedic complications.

216 Fix or Replace: Is Internal Fixation Still A Viable Option in The Elderly with Un-Displaced Intracapsular Femoral Neck Fractures?

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_6) ◽  
Author(s):  
R Morris ◽  
A Krishna ◽  
H Hamid ◽  
M Chawda ◽  
H Mumtaz
Keyword(s):  
Femoral Neck ◽  
Internal Fixation ◽  
Revision Surgery ◽  
Retrospective Review ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Femoral Neck Fractures ◽  
Type I ◽  
Cannulated Screws ◽  
Viable Option ◽  
Displaced Femoral Neck Fractures

Abstract Aim The treatment of impacted or un-displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly osteoporotic patient is still largely debated, with arthroplasty versus internal fixation two surgical options1. Our aim was to retrospectively review patients over the age of 80 with un-displaced intracapsular hip fractures who had undergone internal fixation and assess their rate of mortality and revision surgery. Method We conducted a retrospective review of all patients with femoral neck fractures over a 4-year period between January 2015 to December 2018. We refined this to only patients over the age of 80 with un-displaced intracapsular femoral neck fractures fixed with cannulated screws. We noted their mental and mobility status, their follow-up attendance over 3 years, their mortality and rate of revision surgery. Results There were a total of 1232 femoral neck fractures in a 4-year period. Of these, 37 were &gt;80 with un-displaced intracapsular femoral neck fractures, with 23 fixed with cannulated screws and 14 with a Dynamic Hip Screw. Mean age – 85, M:F (1:4.75). All patients were either Garden Classification Type I or II. 4% had cognitive impairment. All patients were independently mobile. 83% were followed up for 3 years, with 1 patient (4%) undergoing revision surgery 3 years following cannulated screw fixation. The 30-day mortality rate was 5%. Conclusions The treatment choice for un-displaced intracapsular femoral neck fractures in the elderly remains debateable. Our retrospective review shows that the rate of re-operation is low in patients who have undergone fixation with cannulated screws and so this remains a viable option.

scholarly journals Treatment of Displaced Femoral Neck Fractures: Unipolar Hemiarthroplasty Versus Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty

KYAMC Journal ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 10-14
Author(s):  
Md Ashraful Islam ◽  
Md Abdur Rashid ◽  
Md Rafiqul Islam ◽  
Md Masudar Rahman ◽  
Md Asmaul Hossain Khan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Femoral Neck ◽  
Early Mobilization ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Femoral Neck Fractures ◽  
Harris Hip Score ◽  
Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty ◽  
Medical College ◽  
Bipolar Group ◽  
Displaced Femoral Neck Fractures ◽  
Displaced Fracture

Background: Femoral neck fractures are common in the elderly population. To avoid the poor outcome of internal fixation and for early mobilization, hemiarthroplasty is performed. However, there is inadequate evidence to support the choice between unipolar or bipolar hemiarthroplasty.Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the outcome of unipolar with the bipolar prosthesis in geriatric patients.Methods: Forty-one patients above 60 years of age and an acute displaced fracture of the femoral neck were randomly allocated to treatment by either unipolar or bipolar hemiarthroplasty, in the Department of Orthopaedics at Khwaja Yunus Ali Medical College and Hospital, Enayetpur, Sirajgonj, Bangladesh in between December 2014 and February 2017. Functional outcome was assessed and compared using Harris hip score and radiological parameters with a follow-up of one year.Results: The two groups of patients with mean age of 67.3 in bipolar group and 75.6 in unipolar group did not differ in their pre-injury characteristics and perioperative parameters. The mean Harris hip score in bipolar and unipolar groups was 86.18±12.18 and 79.79±15.55, respectively (p=0.183); range of motion was 210.63±28.39 and 181.58±37(p=0.015) with bipolar and unipolar groups, respectively. Functional activities were better in the bipolar group. Complications like painful hip, posterior dislocation, periprosthetic fracture and acetabular erosion were encountered in unipolar prostheses.Conclusion: The use of bipolar endoprosthesis in the management of displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly was associated with better mean Harris hip score and incidence of complications was limited. Hence, bipolar would be a better option in elderly patients with fracture neck of femur.KYAMC Journal Vol. 8, No.-1, Jul 2017, Page 10-14

Internal fixation versus arthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures: what is the evidence?

2010 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 87-87
Author(s):  
Martin J. Heetveld ◽  
Cecilia Rogmark ◽  
Frede Frihagen ◽  
John Keating
Keyword(s):  
Femoral Neck ◽  
Internal Fixation ◽  
Femoral Neck Fractures ◽  
Displaced Femoral Neck Fractures
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document