scholarly journals Role of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiography and Nasobiliary Drainage in the Management of Postoperative Biliary Leak

1997 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 221-229 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. K. Goenka ◽  
R. Kochhar ◽  
D. Bhasin ◽  
B. Nagi ◽  
J. D. Wig ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bile Duct ◽  
Common Bile Duct ◽  
Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiography ◽  
Biliary Leak ◽  
Endoscopic Retrograde ◽  
Large Defect ◽  
Endoscopic Nasobiliary Drainage ◽  
Associated Lesions ◽  
Nasobiliary Drainage

In order to assess the role of endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in evaluating the patients with post-operative biliary leak and of endoscopic nasobiliary drainage in its management, 36 patients with biliary leak seen over a period of 9 years were studied. Thirty-two had biliary leak following cholecystectomy, 3 following repair of liver trauma and 1 following choledochoduodenostomy. Patients presented at an interval of 4 days to 210 days (mean ± SEM, 32.4 ± 6.7 days) following laparotomy. Hyperbilirubinemia was noticed in only 13 patients (36.1%), while abdominal ultrasonogram showed ascites or biloma in 24 (66.7%). Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography showed the leak to involve the common bile duct in 55.6%, cystic duct in 33.3% and intrahepatic biliary radicles in 8.3%. Associated lesions included bile duct obstruction due to stricture or accidental ligature in 20%, bile duct stone in 20% and liver abscess in 2.8%.Endoscopic nasobiliary drainage using a 7 Fr pig-tail catheter was attempted in 14 patients and could be established in 12 of them. Bile duct leak sealed in all but one of these 12 patients after an interval of 3 days to 40 days (mean ± SEM, 12.2 ± 3.2 days). A single patient with large defect and a proximal bile duct stricture did not respond and required surgery. Common bile duct stones were removed by endoscopic sphincterotomy in 3 out of 4 patients. One patient with large stone required surgical choledocholithotomy. In conclusion, endoscopic retrograde cholangiography was safe and useful in confirming the presence of leak as well as its site, size and associated abnormalities. Endoscopic nasobiliary drainage proved an effective therapy in post-operative biliary leak and could avoid re-exploration in 71.4% patients.

Foreign bodies of common bile duct

1997 ◽  
Vol 78 (4) ◽  
pp. 299-301
Author(s):  
D. M. Krasilnikov ◽  
M. I. Mavrin ◽  
B. Kh. Kim
Keyword(s):  
Bile Duct ◽  
Common Bile Duct ◽  
Postoperative Period ◽  
Foreign Bodies ◽  
Endoscopic Retrograde ◽  
Endoscopic Nasobiliary Drainage ◽  
The Common ◽  
Nasobiliary Drainage

After endoscopic retrograde pancreatocholangiography, endoscopic nasobiliary drainage and removal of external drains in the postoperative period sometimes fragments of catheters remain in the common bile duct. The left foreign bodies contribute to cholangitis, pancreatitis, mechanical jaundice and concrements formation.

scholarly journals Endoscopic ultrasound versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiography for the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis: the influence of the size of the stone and diameter of the common bile duct

2005 ◽  
Vol 42 (4) ◽  
pp. 239-243 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcus Vinicius Silva Ney ◽  
Fauze Maluf-Filho ◽  
Paulo Sakai ◽  
Bruno Zilberstein ◽  
Joaquim Gama-Rodrigues ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Bile Duct ◽  
Common Bile Duct ◽  
Endoscopic Ultrasound ◽  
Common Bile Duct Stones ◽  
Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiography ◽  
Bile Duct Stones ◽  
Endoscopic Retrograde ◽  
The Common ◽  
Common Bile Duct Diameter

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography is highly accurate in diagnosing choledocholithiasis, but it is the most invasive of the available methods. Endoscopic ultrasonography is a very accurate test for the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis with a risk of complications similar to that of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. AIM: To compare the accuracy of endoscopic ultrassonography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in the diagnosis of common bile duct stones before laparoscopic cholecystectomy and to analyze endoscopic ultrasound results according to stone size and common bile duct diameter. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred and fifteen patients with symptomatic gallstones were admitted for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Sixty-eight of them (31.7%) had a dilated common bile duct and/or hepatic biochemical parameter abnormalities. They were submitted to endoscopic ultrassonography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography. Sphincterotomy and sweeping of the common bile duct were performed if endoscopic ultrassonography or endoscopic retrograde cholangiography were considered positive for choledocholithiasis. After sphincterotomy and common bile duct clearance the largest stone was retrieved for measurement. Endoscopic or surgical explorations of the common bile duct were considered the gold-standard methods for the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis. RESULTS: All 68 patients were submitted to laparoscopic cholecystectomy with intraoperative cholangiography with confirmation of the presence of gallstones. Endoscopic ultrassonography was a more sensitivity test than endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (97% vs. 67%) for the detection of choledocholithiasis. When stones >4.0 mm were analyzed, endoscopic ultrassonography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography presented similar results (96% vs. 90%). Neither the size of the stone nor the common bile duct diameter had influence on endoscopic ultrasonographic performance. CONCLUSIONS: For a group of patients with an intermediate or moderate risk with respect to the likelihood of having common bile duct stones, endoscopic ultrassonography is a better test for the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis when compared to endoscopic retrograde cholangiography mainly for small-sized calculi.

scholarly journals Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Findings Differs From Ultrasound Results: A Study On Choledocholitihisis Patients In A Tertiary Care Hospital Of Bangladesh

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-8
Author(s):  
Tareq Mahmud Bhiuyan ◽  
Mousumi Sanyal ◽  
Sabrina Yesmin S
Keyword(s):  
Bile Duct ◽  
Common Bile Duct ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Ampullary Carcinoma ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Endoscopic Retrograde ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
High Clinical Suspicion ◽  
Normal Ultrasound

Background: Endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography (ERCP) is a universally established modality in evaluation and treatment of pancreatico-biliary disorders. Choledocholothiasis is one of its common indications. In the context of Bangladesh, clinical studies on ERCP, specially, assessment of the role of pre-procedural Ultrasound as a screening tool, is relatively rare. In this work, we have analyzed the ERCP outcome of 95 patients and compared their pre-procedural ultrasound results afterwards. Methods: This cross-sectional observational study was conducted in the BIRDEM General Hospital during June 2013 to January2015 on 95 ERCP patients. Among 95 patients, maximum (27.7%) were diagnosed as Choledocholithiasis. The important diagnosis among the rest were, Chronic Calcific Pancreatitis (13.8%), Ca head of Pancreas (12.7%), Cholangiocarcinoma (11.7%), and peri- ampullary carcinoma (11.7%). Ultrasound could not detect common bile duct stone in 42% of choledocholithiasis patients. It detected dilated common bile duct in 30% patients and 15% patients had normal ultrasound report while they underwent ERCP due to high clinical suspicion and found to have duct stone afterwards. Conclusion: The role of ultrasound as a screening test for choledocholithiasis should be progressively assessed by comparing it with MRCP and ERCP results. This study will encourage further research to find correlation between the ERCP and Imaging (both ultrasound and MRCP) in choledocholithiasis patients Bangladesh J Medicine Jan 2019; 30(1) : 5-8

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document