Abstract OT2-3-03: Denosumab versus placebo as adjuvant treatment for women with early-stage breast cancer at high risk of disease recurrence (D-CARE): An international, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 clinical trial

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
PE Goss ◽  
CH Barrios ◽  
A Chan ◽  
DM Finkelstein ◽  
H Iwata ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Clinical Trial ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Adjuvant Treatment ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Disease Recurrence ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Double Blind Placebo ◽  
Risk Of Disease

KEYNOTE-756: Randomized, double-blind, phase 3 study of pembrolizumab vs placebo combined with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and adjuvant endocrine therapy for high-risk, early-stage estrogen receptor–positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative (ER+/HER2−) breast cancer.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS601-TPS601
Author(s):  
Fatima Cardoso ◽  
Aditya Bardia ◽  
Fabrice Andre ◽  
David W. Cescon ◽  
Heather L. McArthur ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Endocrine Therapy ◽  
Adjuvant Treatment ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Substantial Impact ◽  
Her2 Breast Cancer

TPS601 Background: Although ER+/HER2− breast cancer (BC) has better overall prognosis than other subtypes, a high-risk subpopulation is characterized by high-grade tumors, decreased sensitivity to endocrine therapy (ET), higher responsiveness to chemotherapy (CT), and worse prognosis. Based on prior studies, increased pathological complete response (pCR) rates after neoadjuvant CT may have a substantial impact for patients with high-risk, early-stage HR+/HER2− BC. KEYNOTE-756 (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03725059) is a global, randomized, double-blind, phase 3 study of pembrolizumab (vs placebo) + CT as neoadjuvant treatment followed by pembrolizumab (vs placebo) + ET as adjuvant treatment for patients with high-risk, early-stage ER+/HER2− BC. Methods: Patients with T1c-2 cN1-2 (tumor size ≥2 cm) or T3-4 cN0-2 grade 3, invasive, ductal ER+/HER2− BC will be stratified by lymph node involvement (positive vs negative), tumor PD-L1 status (positive [CPS≥1] vs negative [CPS < 1]), ER positivity (ER+ ≥10% vs ER+ < 10%), and anthracycline dosing schedule (every 3 weeks [Q3W] vs Q2W), then randomized 1:1 to neoadjuvant treatment with pembrolizumab 200 mg Q3W or placebo combined with paclitaxel (80 mg/m2 Q1W) for 4 cycles followed by doxorubicin (60 mg/m2) or epirubicin (100 mg/m2), each with cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m2) Q2/3W for 4 cycles. After definitive surgery (± radiation therapy, as indicated), patients will receive adjuvant treatment of pembrolizumab (200 mg Q3W) or placebo for 9 more administrations combined with ET, which can be given for up to 10 years. There will be no crossover between treatment arms when moving from neoadjuvant to adjuvant treatment. Dual primary endpoints are pCR rate (ypT0/Tis ypN0) and event-free survival (EFS). Secondary endpoints include ypT0/Tis and ypT0 ypN0 pCR rates in all patients and all 3 pCR definitions in those with PD-L1+ tumors, EFS in patients with PD-L1+ tumors, overall survival, safety, and health-related quality of life. Interim analyses are planned. Enrollment is currently ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT03725059.

Clinical trial testing superiority of combination plinabulin (Plin) and pegfilgrastim (Peg) versus peg alone in breast cancer treated with high-risk febrile neutropenia risk chemotherapy (chemo): Final results of the phase 3 protective-2 in chemo-induced neutropenia (CIN) prevention.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 533-533
Author(s):  
Douglas W. Blayney ◽  
Yuankai Shi ◽  
Hryhorii Adamchuk ◽  
David Feng ◽  
Qingyuan Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Safety Profile ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Severe Neutropenia ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Double Blind

533 Background: Peg is standard of care (SoC) for the prevention of CIN. Peg’s mechanism of action leaves patients vulnerable to FN in week 1 of the chemo cycle(C), as the absolute neutrophil count (ANC) does not normalize until week 2. Plin is a first-in-class, non-G-CSF small molecule agent, which received breakthrough designation from FDA in CIN. It prevents CIN by protecting progenitor cells in bone marrow from chemo assault and has normal ANC in week 1 (Blayney JAMA Onc 2020). Phase 2 testing showed the combination of Plin and Peg achieved CIN protection throughout the entire cycle vs Peg alone (Blayney: St Gallen 2019, ASCO 2019). Methods: Plin is given on Day (D)1 after Chemo, has a favorable safety profile, and also has anticancer activity. A separate phase 3 study evaluating Plin as an anticancer agent (DUBLIN-3; NCT02504489) in NSCLC pts is underway, with anti-cancer results in OS expected in 2021. In PROTECTIVE-2 (Study 106; NCT0329457), we added Plin (on D1) to Peg (on D2), testing superiority of the combination for CIN prevention vs Peg alone. Study 106, is a global multicenter randomized (1:1) double-blind study to evaluate Plin 40 mg + Peg 6mg (Arm 1) versus Peg 6mg + Placebo (Plac) (Arm 2) in preventing Severe Neutropenia (N), (defined as ANC <0.5 cells × 10E9/L) in early-stage BC (node positive or node negative with a high risk of recurrence) pts. 221 pts with ECOG status 0 or 1 received Docetaxel (75 mg/m2), Doxorubicin (50 mg/m2), and Cyclophosphamide (500 mg/m2) (TAC) on D1 for four 21 D cycles and study treatment. Central laboratory ANC was assessed at Covance in Cycle 1 (C1) on D 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, and 15. Primary objective was to compare the percentage (%) of pts with a Duration of Severe Neutropenia (DSN) of 0 days [that is % of pts with no Grade (Gr) 4 neutropenia (N)] in C1 in each arm. Key secondary endpoints were DSN and ANC Nadir in C1. We also evaluated safety (AE frequency and Grade). Conclusions: Adding Plin to Peg offers superior CIN protection compared to Peg alone and also has a superior safety profile by lowering over 20% of grade 4 AE. The effect size of the CIN protection in the combination is also correlated to clinical meaningful FN reduction compared to peg alone. Clinical trial information: NCT03531099. [Table: see text]

Denosumab versus placebo as adjuvant treatment for women with early-stage breast cancer at high risk of disease recurrence (D-CARE): An international, placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind phase III clinical trial.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS662-TPS662
Author(s):  
Paul E. Goss ◽  
Carlos H. Barrios ◽  
Arlene Chan ◽  
Dianne M. Finkelstein ◽  
Hiroji Iwata ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Clinical Trial ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Bone Metastasis ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Early Stage Breast Cancer ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Patient Reported

TPS662 Background: In women with early-stage breast cancer, bone is a common site of distant recurrence and represents approximately 40% of all first recurrences. Preclinical studies demonstrated that inhibition of RANKL significantly delays skeletal tumor formation, reduces skeletal tumor burden, and prolongs survival of tumor-bearing mice. Denosumab is approved for the prevention of skeletal-related events (SREs) in patients with established bone metastases from solid tumors. The D-CARE trial is designed to assess if denosumab treatment prolongs bone metastasis-free survival (BMFS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in the adjuvant breast cancer setting. The primary endpoint of this event-driven trial is BMFS. Secondary endpoints include DFS and overall survival. Additional endpoints include safety, breast density, time to first on-study SRE (following the development of bone metastasis), patient reported outcomes, and biomarkers. Methods: In this international, randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled phase 3 trial, 4509 women with stage II or III breast cancer at high risk for recurrence and with known hormone and HERE2 receptor status were randomized. High risk was defined as biopsy evidence of breast cancer in regional lymph nodes, tumor size > 5 cm (T3), or locally advanced disease (T4). Standard-of-care adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemo-, endocrine, or HER-2 targeted therapy, alone or in combination, must be planned. Patients with a prior history of breast cancer (except DCIS or LCIS) or distant metastasis, oral bisphosphonate (BP) use within 1 year of randomization, or any intravenous BP use, were not eligible. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive denosumab 120 mg or placebo subcutaneously monthly for 6 months, then every 3 months for a total of 5 years of treatment. Supplemental vitamin D (≥ 400 IU) and calcium (≥ 500 mg) were required. The trial, sponsored by Amgen Inc., began enrolling patients in June 2010 and completed enrollment in late 2012. Clinical trial information: NCT01077154.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document