Abstract PS9-21: Patient reported outcomes of newly diagnosed women with breast cancer enrolled in a digital health coaching program

Author(s):  
Kelly J Brassil ◽  
Bryan Fellman ◽  
Brett Wisse ◽  
Diana Urbauer ◽  
Valerie Shelton ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e19278-e19278
Author(s):  
Kelly Jean Brassil ◽  
Jonathan Patterson ◽  
Matthew Allison ◽  
Stephen Burton ◽  
Thupten Norbu ◽  
...  

e19278 Background: Many individuals with cancer, as high as 90% in some studies, experience co-morbidities, which are associated with survival, quality of life and health care costs. Patient reported outcomes (PRO) have demonstrated efficacy in tracking outcomes for individuals with cancer and other chronic conditions. We present real world evidence of co-morbidities and PRO data from a cohort of individuals with cancer engaged in a digital health coaching program. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted of self-reported co-morbidity data and PROs collected from individuals with cancer upon enrollment in a digital health coaching program. Descriptive statistics define frequency of co-morbidities and means of PRO, including the Patient Reported Outcome Measures Information System-Global Health (PROMIS-GH)10, for individuals with cancer only compared with those who also had a co-morbid condition. Results: Of 570 individuals, 127 reported a co-morbid condition on enrollment into the coaching program (22%). Of these, 49.6% (n = 63) reported 1, and 50.4% (n = 64) reported 2 or more conditions, of which the most commonly reported were cardiovascular (45.6%), metabolic (39.3%), and immune-related (22.8%). Mean PRO scores at baseline are presented for each measure for individuals who reported either no or 1 or more co-morbid conditions at baseline (Table). Interestingly individuals with at least 1 comorbidity reported higher PRO scores for physical and mental health at baseline than those with cancer alone. Conclusions: Co-morbid conditions, while known to influence clinical outcomes among individuals with cancer, may also influence trends in PRO. Higher scores in this cohort may suggest that experience with a pre-existing condition may support the individual’s ability to cope with a cancer diagnosis and its physical and emotional sequelae. Digital health coaching may offer a unique non-clinical approach to gather this data and to support individuals to optimize self-efficacy, improving health outcomes beyond the clinical setting. [Table: see text]


2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (27_suppl) ◽  
pp. 189-189
Author(s):  
Matthew Allison ◽  
Stephen Burton ◽  
Dhiren Patel ◽  
Kelly Jean Brassil

189 Background: Barriers during cancer care include lack of social support, financial concerns, and communication with providers. While navigation has been identified as a way to address these concerns in the clinical context, opportunities exist to identify and address patient-reported barriers through digital health coaching to support patients beyond the clinical care setting. Methods: A retrospective analysis evaluated patient-reported barriers during cancer care for 708 individuals over the course of a digital health coaching program. Barriers were assessed in six domains, each represented by 5-10 questions in a company developed survey. The questions were administered prior to coaching on content aligned to the domains, specifically eating healthy, exercise, financial, access to care and medication adherence. Patients ranked both the presence and severity of the barrier. Patient reported outcomes such as exercise (Godin), health eating (Start the Conversation), financial toxicity (Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (COST)) and physiologic and psychosocial outcomes (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Global Health (PROMIS-GH) 10) were measured and aligned to the barrier domains identified by the participants. Results: The eating healthy domain (2.43) received a significantly higher average score compared to other domains: financial (1.86), exercise (1.71), medication adherence (1.68) and access to care (1.65). Over the 12-week coaching program, physical activity increased by 56%, fatigue was reduced by 32%, financial toxicity was reduced by 8%, the healthy eating score improved by 17% and pain was reduced by 13%, as reflected in the PROMIS GH-10, Godin, STC and COST data. Conclusions: Outcomes suggest that healthy eating is a significant barrier identified by cancer patients during their treatment, followed by financial concerns and exercise, each of which demonstrated improvement over the course of digital health coaching. These results suggest digital health coaching provides a benefit to addressing barriers during cancer treatment and may improve patient reported outcomes, particularly as they relate to wellness behaviors such as healthy eating and exercise.


2018 ◽  
Vol 29 ◽  
pp. viii90 ◽  
Author(s):  
P.A. Fasching ◽  
F.J. Esteva ◽  
X. Pivot ◽  
A. Nusch ◽  
J.T. Beck ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document