Exploitation of an Ancient Escape Circuit by an Avian Predator: Relationships between Taxon-Specific Prey Escape Circuits and the Sensitivity to Visual Cues from the Predator

2001 ◽  
Vol 58 (4) ◽  
pp. 218-240 ◽  
Author(s):  
P.G. Jabłoński ◽  
N.J. Strausfeld
Keyword(s):  
Visual Cues ◽  
Avian Predator ◽  
Prey Escape

Supporting the Use of Rudimentary Vocalizations

2014 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 132-139 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lauren Zubow ◽  
Richard Hurtig
Keyword(s):  
Rett Syndrome ◽  
Visual Cues ◽  
Acoustic Analysis ◽  
Eye Gaze ◽  
Research Question ◽  
Primary Research ◽  
Multiple Modalities ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Perceptual Judgments ◽  
The Face

Children with Rett Syndrome (RS) are reported to use multiple modalities to communicate although their intentionality is often questioned (Bartolotta, Zipp, Simpkins, & Glazewski, 2011; Hetzroni & Rubin, 2006; Sigafoos et al., 2000; Sigafoos, Woodyatt, Tuckeer, Roberts-Pennell, & Pittendreigh, 2000). This paper will present results of a study analyzing the unconventional vocalizations of a child with RS. The primary research question addresses the ability of familiar and unfamiliar listeners to interpret unconventional vocalizations as “yes” or “no” responses. This paper will also address the acoustic analysis and perceptual judgments of these vocalizations. Pre-recorded isolated vocalizations of “yes” and “no” were presented to 5 listeners (mother, father, 1 unfamiliar, and 2 familiar clinicians) and the listeners were asked to rate the vocalizations as either “yes” or “no.” The ratings were compared to the original identification made by the child's mother during the face-to-face interaction from which the samples were drawn. Findings of this study suggest, in this case, the child's vocalizations were intentional and could be interpreted by familiar and unfamiliar listeners as either “yes” or “no” without contextual or visual cues. The results suggest that communication partners should be trained to attend to eye-gaze and vocalizations to ensure the child's intended choice is accurately understood.

Visual Cues, Decoding, Literacy, and the Brain

2007 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 9-12
Author(s):  
Judith A Curtin
Keyword(s):  
Visual Cues ◽  
The Brain

Online Disinhibition Effect: Identity, Temporality, and Visual Cues

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melanie Nguyen ◽  
Andrew J. Campbell
Keyword(s):  
Visual Cues ◽  
Disinhibition Effect ◽  
Online Disinhibition

Facilitation of learning spatial relations among locations in the absence of coincident visual cues

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bradley R. Sturz ◽  
Debbie M. Kelly ◽  
Michael F. Brown
Keyword(s):  
Visual Cues ◽  
Spatial Relations

Visual Cues Effects on Temperature Perception

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carrie Anne Balcer ◽  
Andrew Shirtz ◽  
Taylor Rolison ◽  
Mounia Ziat
Keyword(s):  
Visual Cues ◽  
Temperature Perception

Visual cues and spatial pattern learning

2001 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael F. Brown ◽  
Sue Yang ◽  
Kelly Digian
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Pattern ◽  
Visual Cues ◽  
Pattern Learning

Using Expert Knowledge to Identify Visual Cues for Landmine Detection

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
James J. Staszewski ◽  
Alan D. Davison ◽  
David J. Dippel ◽  
Julia A. Tischuk
Keyword(s):  
Visual Cues ◽  
Expert Knowledge ◽  
Landmine Detection
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document