Prenatal Diagnosis of Zygosity by Fetal DNA Analysis, a Contribution to the Management of Multiple Pregnancies

2002 ◽  
Vol 17 (6) ◽  
pp. 339-342 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronaldo Levy ◽  
Véronique Mirlesse ◽  
François Jacquemard ◽  
Fernand Daffos
Author(s):  
Florin Stamatian ◽  
Gabriela Caracostea ◽  
Tunde Kovacs ◽  
Mariela Militaru

ABSTRACT Apert syndrome is a rare autosomal dominant disorder characterized by severe craniosynostosis, hypoplastic mediofacial structures and symmetric syndactyly. The syndactyly involves both cutaneous and osseous structures of the upper and lower limbs. Apart from skeletal anomalies, affected fetuses may often present central nervous system malformations and various visceral malformations (congenital heart defects, genitourinary anomalies, choanal stenosis, tracheal abnormalities, diaphragmatic hernia and omphalocele). Mental retardation is frequently encountered, as are a large variety of craniofacial and neurocognitive phenotypes. The incidence of Apert syndrome is approximately one in 65,000 newborns, representing 4.5% of all craniosynostosis cases. The first cases of Apert syndrome were diagnosed by ultrasound and fetoscopy in the third trimester of pregnancy. With the introduction of three-dimensional (3D) ultrasonography, identification of fetal changes characteristic of Apert syndrome is possible in the second trimester of pregnancy. Diagnosis confirmation requires fetal DNA analysis by fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 gene amplification (FGFR2) followed by sequencing and digestion with restriction enzymes. Recently, noninvasive prenatal diagnosis was reported using free fetal DNA analysis with cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) in maternal plasma by Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) assay and enzymatic digestion with restriction enzymes. As the syndrome has rarely been reported in Romania, we present the case of a fetus diagnosed with Apert syndrome in the second trimester of pregnancy. Early ultrasound detection of suggestive signs for this syndrome (craniosynostosis, syndactyly) was followed by confirmation of the diagnosis by prenatal fetal DNA analysis. How to cite this article Stamatian F, Kovacs T, Militaru M, Caracostea G. Apert Syndrome in the Era of Prenatal Diagnosis. Donald School J Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014;8(2):222-225.


2008 ◽  
Vol 28 (13) ◽  
pp. 1227-1231 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irina Banzola ◽  
Inès Kaufmann ◽  
Olav Lapaire ◽  
Sinuhe Hahn ◽  
Wolfgang Holzgreve ◽  
...  

1996 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 345-348 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. L. KWEE ◽  
J. R. LO TEN FOE ◽  
F. ARWERT ◽  
G. PALS ◽  
K. MADAN ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 15 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. 17-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neil D. Avent ◽  
A Webb ◽  
TE Madgett ◽  
T Miran ◽  
K Sillence ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Current invasive procedures [amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling (CVS)] pose a risk to mother and fetus and such diagnostic procedures are available only to high risk pregnancies limiting aneuploidy detection rate. This review seeks to highlight the necessity of investing in non invasive prenatal diagnosis (NIPD) and how NIPD would improve patient safety and detection rate as well as allowing detection earlier in pregnancy. Non invasive prenatal diagnosis can take either a proteomics approach or nucleic acid-based approach; this review focuses on the latter. Since the discovery of cell free fetal DNA (cffDNA) and fetal RNA in maternal plasma, procedures have been developed for detection for monogenic traits and for some have become well established (e.g., RHD blood group status). However, NIPD of aneuploidies remains technically challenging. This review examines currently published literature evaluating techniques and approaches that have been suggested and developed for aneuploidy detection, highlighting their advantages and limitations and areas for further research.


2018 ◽  
Vol 53 (1) ◽  
pp. 87-94 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. J. Vivanti ◽  
J.‐M. Costa ◽  
A. Rosefort ◽  
P. Kleinfinger ◽  
L. Lohmann ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document