Percutaneous-Based Management of Staghorn Calculi in Solitary Kidney: Combined Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy versus Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery

2014 ◽  
Vol 94 (1) ◽  
pp. 70-73 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wen Zhong ◽  
Zhijian Zhao ◽  
Liang Wang ◽  
Sunil Swami ◽  
Guohua Zeng
Keyword(s):  
Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Solitary Kidney ◽  
Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery ◽  
Staghorn Calculi ◽  
Combined Use ◽  
Stone Free Rate ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Free Rate ◽  
Group 1

Introduction: Mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mini-PCNL) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) are well-established techniques with little morbidity. The combined use of standard PCNL and the mini-PCNL or the RIRS technique was evaluated and compared to investigate their own role in the management of staghorn calculi in solitary kidney. Materials and Methods: 23 patients received combined standard PCNL and mini-PCNL (group 1), and 22 patients received combined standard PCNL and RIRS (group 2). The treatment results and complications were evaluated and compared. Results: The mean operation time was 128.8 ± 9.1 min in group 1 and 109.8 ± 10.7 min in group 2 (p < 0.001). The decrease in hemoglobin level in group 1 was significantly higher than that in group 2 (3.5 ± 0.6 vs. 2.1 ± 0.5 g/dl, p < 0.001). The final stone-free rate was significantly higher (p = 0.038) in group 2 (90.9%) than in group 1 (65.2%). Conclusions: Combined standard PCNL and RIRS technique can extract the majority of staghorn calculi quickly by PCNL with EMS Lithoclast, and RIRS used simultaneously can reduce the need for multiple tracts and therefore reduce blood loss and potential morbidity related to multiple tracts, shorten the operation time and achieve a high stone-free rate.

scholarly journals Comparative Study of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Supine and Prone Positions

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 154-157
Author(s):  
Anup Chapagain ◽  
Robin Bahadur Basnet ◽  
Chitaranjan Shah ◽  
Arvind Kumar Shah ◽  
Parash Mani Shrestha ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Dose ◽  
Prone Position ◽  
Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy ◽  
Supine Position ◽  
Operative Duration ◽  
Stone Free Rate ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Free Rate ◽  
Group 1

Background: The aim of the study is the compare efficacy and safety of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in supine and prone positions. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy is conventionally performed in prone position but in recent years numbers of supine percutaneous nephrolithotomies is increasing globally.Methods: The hospital based cross-sectional observational study was conducted in the Department of Urology, Bir Hospital from July 2018 to January 2020. A total of 81 consecutive patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy were divided into two groups, with 38 patients in Supine (Group 1) and 43 patients in Prone (Group 2) positions, respectively. Patient’s demographics, access time, operative duration, stone free rate, radiation dose and duration, irrigation fluid volume, post-operative hemoglobin drop and complications were compared.Results: Demographic and stone characteristics were comparable in both groups. Supine Group (Group 1) had significantly shorter operative duration than Prone Group (Group 2), 44.63 ± 12.44minsvs 53.02 ±12.67mins (p< 0.04). The mean radiation duration was 99.11 ± 61.17secs in Group 1 and 108.40 ± 51.65 secs in Group 2 (p=0.46), respectively. Although the mean radiation dose was lower in Group 1 (375.1µGym2) than in Group 2 (465.7 µGym2), it was not statistically significant(p=0.24). The stone free rate at 1 month duration were comparable with 92.1% and 93.02% in Group 1 and Group 2 respectively (p=0.16). Overall complication rates were similar in both groups (15.7% in Group 1 vs 16.2% in Group 2), respectively. None of the patients in both groups had complications higher than Clavien IIIa.Conclusions: PCNL in supine position has significantly shorter operative time with similar complications and stone free rates as compared to prone position.Keywords: percutaneous nephrolithotomy; prone position; supine position

Comparison of laparoscopic pyelolithotomy and retrograde intrarenal surgery in the management of large renal pelvic stone

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mehmet Cagatay Cicek ◽  
Tariq Asi ◽  
Kadir Omur Gunseren ◽  
Hakan Kilicarslan
Keyword(s):  
Operation Time ◽  
Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery ◽  
Median Hospital Stay ◽  
Efficient Procedure ◽  
Laparoscopic Pyelolithotomy ◽  
Stone Free Rate ◽  
Lower Complication ◽  
Lower Complication Rate ◽  
Median Hospital ◽  
Free Rate

Abstract Background To compare the clinical outcomes of laparoscopic pyelolithotomy (LP) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) in the management of large renal pelvic stones. Methods This study included patients who presented with a single renal pelvic stone sized ≥20 mm and who were treated primarily by laparoscopic pyelolithotomy or retrograde intrarenal surgery. The patients were grouped based on the surgical procedure they underwent. We retrospectively examined and compared the age, the longest axis and the surface area of the stone, operation time, hospitalization time, complications and stone-free rates of the two groups. Results Of the 156 patients included in the study, 44 had laparoscopic pyelolithotomy, and 112 had retrograde intrarenal surgery. Patients who received laparoscopic pyelolithotomy (13 males, 31 females) had a median age of 54 (18-79) years, while those who underwent retrograde intrarenal surgery (46 males, 66 females) had a median age of 54.5 (18-79). Patients who received laparoscopic pyelolithotomy were found to have larger median stone size (30 mm vs 24 mm, p=0.003), longer operation time (100 minutes vs 70 minutes, p=0.007), lower complication rate (2% vs 8.9%, p=0.063), longer median hospital stay (3 days vs 1 day, p<0.001) and better stone-free rate at the third month (90.9% vs 67.9%, p<0.001). Conclusion LP is a safe and efficient procedure that could be used as an alternative to retrograde intrarenal surgery in managing large renal pelvic stones.

scholarly journals Supracostal Approach for PCNL: Is 10th and 11th Intercostal Space Safe According to Clavien Classification System?

2014 ◽  
Vol 99 (6) ◽  
pp. 857-862 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cengiz Kara ◽  
Tansu Değirmenci ◽  
Zafer Kozacioglu ◽  
Bulent Gunlusoy ◽  
Omer Koras ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Shock Wave Lithotripsy ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Intercostal Space ◽  
Clavien Classification ◽  
Stone Free Rate ◽  
Grade Ii ◽  
Clavien Classification System ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Free Rate ◽  
Group 1

Abstract The purpose of this study was to evaluate the success and morbidity of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) performed through the 11th and 10th intercostal space. Between March 2005 and February 2012, 612 patients underwent PCNL, 243 of whom had a supracostal access. The interspace between the 11th and 12th rib was used in 204 cases (group 1) and between the 10th and 11th interspaces in 39 cases (group 2). PCNL was performed using standard supracostal technique in all patients. The operative time, success rate, hospital stay, and complications according to the modified Clavien classification were compared between group 1 and group 2. The stone-free rate was 86.8% in group 1 and 84.6% in group 2 after one session of PCNL. Auxiliary procedures consisting of ureterorenoscopy (URS) and shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) were required in 5 and 7 patients, respectively, in group 1; and in 1 patient each in group 2 . After the auxiliary procedures, stone-free rates increased to 92.6% in group 1 and 89.7% in group 2. A total of 74 (30.4%) complications were documented in the 2 groups according to modified Clavien classification. Grade-I complications were recorded in 20 (8.2%), grade-II in 38 (15.6%), grade-IIIa in 13 (5.3%), and grade-IIIb in 2 (0.8%) patients; grade-IVa was recorded in 1 (0.4%) patient. There were no grade-IVb or grade-V complications. Overall complication rate was 30.9% in group 1 and 28.2% in group 2. Supracostal PCNL in selected cases is effective and safe with acceptable complications. The modified Clavien system provides a standardized grading system for complications of PCNL.

scholarly journals Which factors affect the success of pediatric PCNL? Single center experience over 20 years

2020 ◽  
Vol 92 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Volkan Izol ◽  
Nihat Satar ◽  
Yıldırım Bayazit ◽  
Fatih Gokalp ◽  
Nebil Akdogan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Transfusion ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy ◽  
Pediatric Patients ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Fluoroscopy Time ◽  
Postoperative Blood Transfusion ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Group 1

Objective: We aimed to investigate the impact of surgeons’ experience on pediatric percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) outcomes. Materials and methods: Between June 1997 and June 2018, 573 pediatric patients with 654 renal units underwent PCNL for renal stone disease by senior surgeons. Data were divided into two groups, group-1 (n = 267), first ten years period, group-2 (n = 387); second ten years period. Results: Mean ± SD age of patients was 7.6 ± 4.9 (1-17) years. The stone-free rates (SFR) assessed after 4 weeks were 74.9% vs. 83.4% in group-1 vs. group-2, respectively (p = 0.03). The mean operation time, fluoroscopy time, and the number of patients requiring blood transfusion significantly decreased in group 2 (100.4 ± 57.5 vs. 63.63 ± 36.3, 12.1 ± 8.3 vs. 8.3 ± 5.4, and 24.3% vs. 2.9%; p < 0.001, p < 0.001, and p = 0.002 in group-1 versus group-2, respectively). On multivariate analysis, increasing stone size increased operation time (p < 0.001), fluoroscopy time (p < 0.001), intraoperative and postoperative blood transfusion rates (p = 0.006 and p = 0.018, respectively), and hospital stay (p = 0.002) but was not associated with change of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) (p = 0.71). Sheath size also correlated with increased fluoroscopy time (p < 0.001), operation time (p < 0.001), intraoperative blood transfusion (p < 0.001) and hospital stay, but sheath size did not affect postoperative blood transfusion (p = 0.614) or GFR change (p = 0.994). Conclusions: The percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is a minimally invasive procedure and is well accepted because of its lower complication rate and high efficiency for pediatric patients. Stone and sheath size are predictive factors for blood loss and hospital stay. During 20 years, our fluoroscopy time, operation time, blood loss, and complication rates decreased, and stone-free rate increased.

scholarly journals Supine versus prone position in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

F1000Research ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. 231
Author(s):  
Ponco Birowo ◽  
William Tendi ◽  
Indah S. Widyahening ◽  
Nur Rasyid ◽  
Widi Atmoko
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Prone Position ◽  
Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy ◽  
Complication Rate ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Major Complication ◽  
Stone Free Rate ◽  
Major Complication Rate ◽  
Free Rate

Background: The decision for using supine or prone position in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is still debatable. The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety profile of the supine and prone position when performing PCNL. Methods: A systematic electronic search was performed using the database from MEDLINE, Cochrane library and Google Scholar from January 2009 to November 2019. The outcomes assessed were stone free rate, major complication rate, length of hospital stay and mean operation time. Results: A total of 11 articles were included in qualitative and quantitative analysis. The efficacy of PCNL in supine position as determined by stone free rate is significantly lower than in prone position (OR: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.66 – 0.83; p<0.00001), However, major complication rate is also lower in the supine group compared with the prone group (OR: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.51 – 0.96; p=0.03). There is no statistically significant difference in the length of hospital stay and mean operation time between both groups. Conclusion: Prone position leads to a higher stone free rate, but also a higher rate of major complication. Thus, the decision of using which position during PCNL should be based on the surgeon’s experience and clinical aspects of the patients.

scholarly journals Is routine ureteral stenting really necessary after retrograde intrarenal surgery?

2015 ◽  
Vol 87 (1) ◽  
pp. 72 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ekrem Ozyuvali ◽  
Berkan Resorlu ◽  
Ural Oguz ◽  
Yildiray Yildiz ◽  
Tolga Sahin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Colic ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Stent Insertion ◽  
Dimension Stone ◽  
Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery ◽  
Residual Stone ◽  
Double J Stent ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Free Status ◽  
Group 1

Objectives: To investigate the situations in which ureteral double-J stent should be used after retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS). Patients and Methods: Patients with no ureteral double-J stent after RIRS constituted Group 1, and those with double- J stent after RIRS constituted Group 2. Patients’ age and gender, renal stone characteristics (location and dimension), stone-free status, VAS score 8 hours after surgery, post-procedural renal colic attacks, length of hospitalization, requirement for re-hospitalization, time to rehospitalization and secondary procedure requirements were analyzed. Results: RIRS was performed on 162 renal units. Double-J stent was used in 121 (74.6%) of these after RIRS, but not in the other 41 (25.4%). At radiological monitoring at the first month postoperatively after RIRS, complete stone-free status was determined in 122 (75.3%) renal units, while residual stone was present in 40 (24.6%). No significant differences were observed between the groups in terms of duration of fluoroscopy (p = 0.142), operation (p = 0.108) or hospitalization times (p = 0.798). VAS values determined routinely on the evening of surgery were significantly higher in Group 1 than in Group 2 (p = 0.025). Twenty-eight (17.2%) presentations were made to the emergency clinic due to renal colic within 1 month after surgery. Double-J catheter was present in 24 (85.7%) of these patients. Conclusions: Routine double-J stent insertion after RIRS is not essential since it increases costs, morbidity and operation time.

Flank Suspended Supine Position for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy

2012 ◽  
Vol 79 (1) ◽  
pp. 58-61 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pan Tie-jun ◽  
Li Gong-cheng ◽  
Ye Zhang-qun ◽  
Wen Han-dong ◽  
Shen Guo-qiu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy ◽  
Supine Position ◽  
Renal Stone ◽  
Pleural Cavity ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Bleeding Rate ◽  
Extracorporeal Shock Wave ◽  
Stone Free Rate ◽  
Positioning Method ◽  
Free Rate

Aims Prone and supine positions for percutaneous nephrolithotomy are widely used but have their drawbacks. We report a new positioning method called “flank suspended supine position” (FSSP) for PCNL and describe our experience with PCNL in this position to evaluate its safety and efficacy. Methods Retrospective study of 150 cases of renal stone patients treated with PCNL in a new position called flank suspended supine position (FSSP) from June 2009 to July 2010. All patients were treated with PCNL in FSSP under epidural anesthesia. Operation time, bleeding rate, stone free rate, and complications were recorded. Results All patients tolerated FSSP. Mean operation time was 78.29±26.13 min. Initial stone-free rate was 83%. For those with residual stones (26 cases), 18 were stone-free after a second PCNL, 8 after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL). Mean hospital stay was 7.63±2.39 days. No penetrating injury of the pleural cavity or injury to visceral organs was reported. Summary FSSP is an effective and safe position for PCNL in our hands and its effectiveness relative to traditional prone position needs to be determined in future randomized studies.

scholarly journals The Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy with Different Access Sizes for the Single Renal Stone ≤25 mm: A Randomized Prospective Study

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Weimin Yu ◽  
Yuan Ruan ◽  
Zhuang Xiong ◽  
Yunlong Zhang ◽  
Ting Rao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Stone Free Rate ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy ◽  
Free Rate

<b><i>Objectives:</i></b> The aim of this study was to provide a randomized controlled trial comparing the outcomes of different access sizes used in the solo ultrasonic-guided minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mini-PCNL). <b><i>Methods:</i></b> From January 2018 to December 2019, a total of 160 cases with single renal stones of &#x3c;25 mm were randomized to undergo mini-PCNLs with Fr16, Fr18, Fr20, or Fr22 accesses. All accesses were established with the axis of the target calyx as the marker for puncture location and then expanded to the desired size. Hemoglobin reduction, operative time, stone-free rate, complications, etc., were all recorded and assessed. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The demographic data were similar, and there were no significantly intergroup differences in stone-free rate, complications, and hospital stay time. The hemoglobin reduction was comparable and was 0.9 ± 0.6, 0.9 ± 0.7, 1.0 ± 0.5, and 1.1 ± 0.7 g/dL for the groups Fr16, Fr18, Fr20, and Fr22, respectively. The operative time was 53.4 ± 14.5, 48.5 ± 15.2, 42.8 ± 13.3, and 43.3 ± 13.1 min for the 4 groups, which decreased significantly from group Fr16 to Fr20, but there was no significant difference between Fr20 and Fr22 groups. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> The axis of target calyx is a reliable marker for establishment of percutaneous renal access under ultrasonic guidance. The surgical outcomes of different access sizes were comparable, but the operation time was significantly shortened with the increase of size. However, Fr22 was not more efficient than Fr20.

scholarly journals Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus open surgery for treatment of staghorn stones in pediatric patients

2014 ◽  
Vol 8 (11-12) ◽  
pp. 906 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmed R. EL-Nahas ◽  
Ahmed A Shokeir ◽  
Ahmed M Shoma ◽  
Ibrahim Eraky ◽  
Osama M Sarhan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy ◽  
Open Surgery ◽  
Renal Stones ◽  
Small Sample ◽  
Stone Free Rate ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Free Rate ◽  
Staghorn Stones

Introduction: We compare percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and open surgery in the treatment of staghorn stones in children.Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the electronic records of children who underwent treatment for staghorn stones between September 2000 and August 2013. They were divided between Group 1 (patients who underwent PCNL) and Group 2 (patients who underwent open surgery). We compared stone-free and complications rates, need for multiple procedures, and hospital stay.Results: The study included 41 patients (35 boys and 6 girls), with mean age 7.4 ± 3.1 years (range: 2–15). Of these 41 patients, 26 had unilateral renal stone and 15 had bilateral renal stones. The total number of treated renal units was 56: 28 underwent PCNL and 28 underwent open surgery. The complication rate was comparable for both groups (32% for open surgery vs. 28.6%, p = 0.771). Multiple procedures were more needed in PCNL group (60.7% vs. 32% in open surgery, p = 0.032). The stone-free rate was 71.4% after PCNL and 78.6% after open surgery (p = 0.537). A significant difference was observed in shorter hospital stay after PCNL (5 vs. 8.8 days, p < 0.001). Our study’s limitations include its retrospective design and relatively small sample size.Conclusions: For the treatment of staghorn stones in children, PCNL was comparable to open surgery in complication and stone-free rates. PCNL had the advantage of a shorter hospital stay and open surgery showed a decreased need for multiple procedures. 

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document