Diagnosis of Spinal Cord and Cauda equina Metastases

2015 ◽  
pp. 93-104
Author(s):  
M. M. Sharr
Keyword(s):  
1992 ◽  
Vol 12 (02) ◽  
pp. 98-105 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fin Biering-Sørensen ◽  
Jens Sønksen

1948 ◽  
Vol 239 (25) ◽  
pp. 959-961 ◽  
Author(s):  
Herbert W. Horne ◽  
David P. Paull ◽  
Donald Munro

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 756.e3-756.e5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine Stolper ◽  
Erin R. Hanlin ◽  
Michael D. April ◽  
John L. Ritter ◽  
Curtis J. Hunter ◽  
...  

1985 ◽  
Vol 71 (2) ◽  
pp. 92-95
Author(s):  
R. K. Bradley ◽  
S. H. Murch

SummaryFour cases of spinal cord compression, with symptoms and signs evolving over several years or as quickly as two days, are presented. The symptoms and signs of extrinsic cord compression are described and briefly contrasted with those of intrinsic cord or cauda equina lesions. The need for early clinical diagnosis is emphasised.


1970 ◽  
Vol 33 (6) ◽  
pp. 676-681 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian C. Bailey

✓ This is an analysis of 10 cases of dermoid tumor occurring in the spinal canal (8 lumbar and 2 thoracic). Low-back pain was the commonest presenting symptom, especially if the tumor was adherent to the conus medullaris. Other complaints included urinary dysfunction and motor and sensory disturbances of the legs. Clinical and radiological evidence of spina bifida was found in about half of the cases and suggested the diagnosis of a developmental type of tumor when patients presented with progressive spinal cord compression. At operation, the tumors were often found embedded in the conus medullaris or firmly adherent to the cauda equina, thus precluding complete removal. Evacuation of the cystic contents, however, gave lasting relief of the low-back pain and did not cause any deterioration in neurological function. In a follow-up study, ranging from 1 to 15 years, virtually no improvement in the neurological signs was observed. On the other hand, only one case has deteriorated due to recurrence of tumor growth.


2018 ◽  
pp. 159-174
Author(s):  
Adam M. Robin ◽  
Ilya Laufer

A decision-making framework called NOMS (neurologic, oncologic, mechanical and systemic) facilitates and guides therapeutic decisions for patients with spinal metastases. Patients should be evaluated for signs of myelopathy or cauda equina syndrome. The Epidural Spinal Cord Compression (ESCC) scale facilitates reporting of the degree of radiographic spinal cord compression. A determination of the expected histology-specific tumor response to conventionally fractionated external beam radiation (cEBRT) and systemic therapy should be made. Radiation therapy effectively treats biologic pain for radiosensitive tumors such as multiple myeloma. Patients should undergo a careful evaluation of movement-associated pain as tumor-induced spinal instability is an independent indication for surgery. Determination of tumor-associated mechanical instability can be facilitated by the Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS). Herein, the authors present a case of spinal multiple myeloma managed using the NOMS framework and in consideration of current evidence and treatment paradigms.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document