scholarly journals Clinical Outcomes and Economic Impact of Starting Hemodialysis with a Catheter after Predialysis Arteriovenous Fistula Creation

2019 ◽  
Vol 50 (3) ◽  
pp. 221-227 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alian Al-Balas ◽  
Saad Shariff ◽  
Timmy Lee ◽  
Carlton Young ◽  
Michael Allon

Background: Patients with advanced chronic kidney disease frequently undergo arteriovenous fistula creation prior to reaching end-stage renal disease (ESRD), but some initiate hemodialysis with a central vein catheter, if their fistula is not yet usable. The clinical consequences of the delay in fistula use have not been quantified in such patients. We compared patients with pre-ESRD fistula surgery who initiated dialysis with a catheter versus a fistula in terms of the frequency of post-dialysis vascular access procedures and complications and their economic impact. Methods: We identified 205 patients with predialysis fistula creation from 2006 to 2012 at a large dialysis center who started hemodialysis within the ensuing 2 years. Of these, 91 (44%) initiated dialysis with a catheter and 114 (56%) with a fistula. We compared these 2 groups in terms of their annual frequency of percutaneous vascular access procedures, surgical access procedures, total access procedures, hospitalizations due to catheter-related bacteremia, and overall cost of vascular access management. Results: The 2 groups were similar in demographics, comorbidities, and fistula type. As compared to patients initiating dialysis with a fistula, those initiating with a catheter had a significantly greater annual frequency of percutaneous access procedures (1.29 [1.19–1.40] vs. 0.75 [0.68–0.82]), surgical access procedures (0.69 [0.61–0.76] vs. 0.59 [0.53–0.66]), total access procedures (1.98 [1.86–2.11] vs. 1.34 [1.26–1.44]), and hospitalizations due to catheter-related bacteremia (0.09 [0.07–0.12] vs. 0.02 [0.01–0.03]). Patients initiating dialysis with a catheter incurred a median overall annual cost of access management that was USD 2,669 higher (USD 6,372 [3,121–12,242) vs. USD 3,703 [1,867–6,953], p = 0.0001). Conclusion: Among patients with predialysis fistula creation, those initiating dialysis with a catheter versus a fistula had substantially more frequent percutaneous, surgical, and total vascular access procedures, as well as hospitalizations due to catheter-related bacteremia. The annual cost of access management was substantially higher in those initiating dialysis with a catheter.

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 582-588 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suh Chien Pang ◽  
Ru Yu Tan ◽  
Jia Liang Kwek ◽  
Kian Guan Lee ◽  
Marjorie Wai Yin Foo ◽  
...  

This article described the current state of vascular access management for patients with end-stage renal disease in Singapore. Over the past 10 years, there has been a change in the demographics of end-stage renal disease patients. Aging population and the increase in prevalence of diabetes mellitus has led to the acceleration of chronic kidney disease and increase in incidence and prevalence of end-stage renal disease. Vascular access care has, therefore, been more complicated, with the physical, psychological, and social challenges that occur with increased frequency in elderly patients and patients with multiple co-morbidities. Arteriovenous fistula and arteriovenous graft are created by vascular surgeons, while maintenance of patency of vascular access through endovascular intervention has been a shared responsibility between surgeons, interventional radiologists, and interventional nephrologists. Pre-emptive access creation among end-stage renal disease patients has been low, with up to 80% of new end-stage renal disease patients being commenced on hemodialysis via a dialysis catheter. Access creation is exclusively performed by a dedicated vascular surgeon with arteriovenous fistula success rate up to 78%. The primary and cumulative patency rates of arteriovenous fistula and arteriovenous graft were consistent with the results from many international centers. Vascular access surveillance is not universally practiced in all dialysis centers due to its controversies, in addition to the cost and the limited availability of equipment for surveillance. Timely permanent access placement, with reduced dependence on dialysis catheters, and improved vascular access surveillance are the main areas for potential intervention to improve vascular access management.


2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 148-153 ◽  
Author(s):  
Branko Fila ◽  
Ramon Roca-Tey ◽  
Jan Malik ◽  
Marko Malovrh ◽  
Nicola Pirozzi ◽  
...  

Quality assessment in vascular access procedures for hemodialysis is not clearly defined. The aim of this article is to compare various guidelines regarding recommendation on quality control in angioaccess surgery. The overall population of end-stage renal disease patients and patients in need for hemodialysis treatment is growing every year. Chronic intermittent hemodialysis is still the main therapy. The formation of a functional angioaccess is the cornerstone in the management of those patients. Native (autologous) arteriovenous fistula is the best vascular access available. A relatively high percentage of primary failure and fistula abandonment increases the need for quality control in this field of surgery. There are very few recommendations of quality assessment on creation of a vascular access for hemodialysis in the searched guidelines. Some guidelines recommend the proportion of native arteriovenous fistula in incident and prevalent patients as well as the maximum tolerable percentage of central venous catheters and complications. According to some guidelines, surgeon’s experience and expertise have a considerable influence on outcomes. There are no specific recommendations regarding surgeon’s specialty, grade, level of skills, and experience. In conclusion, there is a weak recommendation in the guidelines on quality control in vascular access surgery. Quality assessment criteria should be defined in this field of surgery. According to these criteria, patients and nephrologists could choose the best vascular access center or surgeon. Centers with best results should be referral centers, and centers with poorer results should implement quality improvement programs.


2020 ◽  
pp. 112972982092608
Author(s):  
Mitsutoshi Shindo ◽  
Kenichi Oguchi ◽  
Chihiro Kimikawa ◽  
Kiyonori Ito ◽  
Jyunki Morino ◽  
...  

Vascular access is necessary for hemodialysis, and in some cases where it is difficult to establish an arteriovenous fistula or arteriovenous graft, a permanent hemodialysis catheter may be used. However, serious catheter-related complications, such as central vein stenosis or thrombosis, can occur. We herein present a case of complete brachiocephalic vein obstruction in a patient with lupus nephritis receiving hemodialysis using a tunneled hemodialysis catheter. A 64-year-old patient underwent maintenance hemodialysis while taking an anticoagulant, with a tunneled hemodialysis catheter in the right internal jugular vein, because of arteriovenous fistula failure when hemodialysis was introduced. However, the catheter was removed because of a catheter-related bloodstream infection. Following the administration of antibiotics, an arteriovenous graft was implanted between the brachial artery and axillary vein in the right arm. Surprisingly, arteriovenous graft failure and complete obstruction of the right brachiocephalic vein were observed 3 days after arteriovenous graft creation. In conclusion, we report the case of tunneled hemodialysis catheter-related complete obstruction of the right brachiocephalic vein in a lupus nephritis patient undergoing hemodialysis. Clinicians should be aware of this potential complication when tunneled hemodialysis catheters are used and consider the next vascular access type before a tunneled hemodialysis catheter has been indwelled for the long term.


2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (Sup10) ◽  
pp. S10-S12
Author(s):  
Mutaz Al-Khateeb ◽  
Zaki Al-Muzakki ◽  
Mohammed Ftyan ◽  
Hussam Itani ◽  
Niki Istwan ◽  
...  

Objective: Over two million individuals worldwide, with end-stage renal disease (ESRD), depend on dialysis therapy or a kidney transplant for survival. Every haemodialysis patient requires vascular access. The arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is preferred for long-term hemodialysis vascular access due to long-term primary patency rates. Given the limited options for haemodialysis access and placement, preservation of existing AVF sites is always a clinical priority. This case report describes a novel approach to wound closure with the application of dehydrated amnion chorion human membrane (dHACM) at an AVF surgical site known to be complicated with issues of scarring and tissue breakdown. The patient was treated successfully with the imperative preservation of his AVF given that he had few other vascular access options.


2020 ◽  
Vol 92 (5) ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
MAJ GEN SINGH ◽  
VINOD KUMAR

<b>Introduction:</b> Central vein stenosis has been reported in patients of end stage renal disease with subclavian vein being more commonly affected than brachiocephalic vein. <br><b>Case report:</b> We present a case of young female with bilateral brachiocephalic vein obstruction following arteriovenous fistula creation for hemodialysis.


2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 230-236
Author(s):  
Saravanan Balamuthusamy ◽  
Larry E Miller ◽  
Diana Clynes ◽  
Erin Kahle ◽  
Richard A Knight ◽  
...  

Objectives: To determine the vascular access modalities used for hemodialysis, the reasons for choosing them, and determinants of satisfaction with vascular access among patients with end-stage renal disease. Methods: The American Association of Kidney Patients Center for Patient Research and Education used the American Association of Kidney Patients patient engagement database to identify eligible adult hemodialysis patients. Participants completed an online survey consisting of 34 demographic, medical history, and hemodialysis history questions to determine which vascular access modalities were preferred and the reasons for these preferences. Results: Among 150 respondents (mean age 54 years, 53% females), hemodialysis was most frequently initiated with central venous catheter (64%) while the most common currently used vascular access was arteriovenous fistula (66%). Most (86%) patients previously received an arteriovenous fistula, among whom 77% currently used the arteriovenous fistula for vascular access. Older patients and males were more likely to initiate hemodialysis with an arteriovenous fistula. The factors most frequently reported as important in influencing the selection of vascular access modality included infection risk (87%), physician recommendation (84%), vascular access durability (78%), risk of complications involving surgery (76%), and impact on daily activities (73%); these factors were influenced by patient age, sex, and race. Satisfaction with current vascular access was 90% with arteriovenous fistula, 79% with arteriovenous graft, and 67% with central venous catheter. Conclusion: Most end-stage renal disease patients continue to initiate hemodialysis with central venous catheter despite being associated with the lowest satisfaction rates. While arteriovenous fistula was associated with the highest satisfaction rate, there are significant barriers to adoption that vary based on patient demographics and perception of procedure invasiveness.


2021 ◽  
pp. 112972982110077
Author(s):  
John J Manov ◽  
Prasoon P Mohan ◽  
Roberto Vazquez-Padron

The number of people worldwide living with end-stage renal disease is increasing. Arteriovenous fistulas are the preferred method of vascular access in patients who will require hemodialysis. As the number of patients with arteriovenous fistulas grows, the role of physicians who intervene who maintain and salvage these fistulas will grow in importance. This review aims to familiarize practitioners with the rationale for arteriovenous fistula creation, the detection of fistula dysfunction, and the state of the art on fistula maintenance and preservation. Current controversies are briefly reviewed.


2021 ◽  
pp. 112972982110212
Author(s):  
Ahmet Murt ◽  
Serap Yadigar ◽  
Serkan Feyyaz Yalin ◽  
Mevlut Tamer Dincer ◽  
Ergun Parmaksiz ◽  
...  

Background: While COVID-19 in chronic hemodialysis patients has high mortality and the pandemic will not end in the near future, effective follow up strategies should be implemented for these patients. Surgeries have been triaged according to their level of urgencies and arteriovenous fistula (AVF) operations were among elective surgeries. This study aimed to analyze the effect of vascular access on the outcomes of hemodialysis patients who had COVID-19. Methods: One hundred four hemodialysis patients who had COVID-19 were retrospectively analyzed. Seventy-two of them had AVF as the vascular access while 32 of them had tunneled catheters. Inflammatory markers and outcomes of patients with AVFs and catheters were compared. A logistic regression analysis was performed in order to define factors that contribute to better outcomes in hemodialysis patients. Results: COVID-19 had high mortality rate in hemodialysis patients (36.5%). Patients with catheters have higher peak ferritin levels ( p = 0.02) and longer hospital stay ( p = 0.00). Having AVF as the vascular access (OR = 3.36; 95% CI: 1.05–10.72; p = 0.041) and using medium cut-off dialyzers (OR = 7.99; 95% CI: 1.53–41.65; p = 0.014) were related to higher survival of the patients. COVID severity was inversely proportional to the survival ( p = 0.000) Conclusions: AVFs contribute to higher survival of hemodialysis patients with COVID-19. Even in the pandemic era, end stage renal disease patients should be given the opportunity to have their vascular access properly created.


2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 71-76 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wen Cao ◽  
Lin Chen ◽  
Mei Shi ◽  
Li Zhou ◽  
Ping Fu

Buttonhole cannulation has been suggested as a technique that may lead to a reduction in many complications when compared with other techniques such as rope-ladder cannulation. Despite all above, some complications still continue, which may lead to a dysfunction of the arteriovenous fistula (AVF) and inadequate dialysis, having an impact on the quality of life of the patients or eventually making the vascular access unusable. We report a 47-year-old Chinese male with end-stage renal disease who had maintenance hemodialysis three times a week for 5 years. The AVF on the left wrist was operated 5 years ago and proved to be functionally effective with some monitoring and surveillance measures in the fourth year of hemodialysis. Two months later, the buttonhole cannulation technique was applied due to fistula punctuation difficulty by previous aneurysmal dilatation. After 10 times of buttonhole cannulation, the edema on the left forearm of the patient indicated a dysfunction of the AVF. This was further confirmed by the HD02 hemodialysis monitor and a vascular ultrasound, revealing a recirculation of 87%, an abnormal fistula between the AVF and the vein together with thrombus, and aneurysmal dilatation near the anastomosis. The site of cannulation was changed to avoid heavy recirculation (reduced to 25%), and a new AVF on the left wrist was successfully operated. Abnormal fistula on the AVF and vein during buttonhole cannulation is rarely reported, which reminds us that vascular access surveillance should be done regularly before and during the process of construction to find a possible dysfunction of the AVF in patients undergoing buttonhole cannulation.


2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 24-27
Author(s):  
Rafaela Andira Ledyastatin ◽  
Caesario Tri Prasetyo ◽  
Gold Sunday Palm Tampubolon ◽  
Dhihintia Jiwangga

Introduction: The incidence of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) globally is 700 million people approximately. Patients with ESRD need vascular access for hemodialysis as renal replacement therapy (RRT). Among hemodialysis access, arteriovenous fistula is considered as the most preferred form of vascular access due to its characteristics. This study aimed to to present a descriptive characteristic of arteriovenous fistula creation cases in a tertiary care hospital with a specific view of demographic parameters, fistulas' sites, type of fistulas. Methods: We conducted a descriptive study of single-center in the Department of Thoracic, Cardiac and Vascular Surgery of Dr. Soetomo Academic General Hospital Surabaya, collected data from January 1st, 2017 to December 31st, 2020. All patients who undergo arteriovenous fistula creation considered as a subject in this study. We retrieved the characteristics of the patients, the type of fistula, the site, surgical technique, and underlying disease from patients’ electronic medical data records. Results: A total of 167 patients requiring long-term hemodialysis in our center. Females were dominantly in our study with 56.9% (95). Most of AVFs were created on the left arm. Radiocephalic type of AVF was the most common arteriovenous fistula type found in 111 subjects (66.5%). The highest postoperative successful rate was found in brachiocephalic type in 78.8%, followed by radiocephalic AVF type with 66.7%. The wrist region was favorable in subjects (43.1%). Conclusions: Arteriovenous fistulas for hemodialysis are needed and in our center. Radiocephalic AVFs are the most common type. Further study to learn the different aspects of arteriovenous fistula cases is needed to fulfill queries in the local population.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document