scholarly journals Interatrial Block Predicts Atrial Fibrillation and Total Mortality in Patients with Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Cardiology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 145 (11) ◽  
pp. 720-729
Author(s):  
Jonatan Jacobsson ◽  
Jonas Carlson ◽  
Christian Reitan ◽  
Rasmus Borgquist ◽  
Pyotr G. Platonov

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Interatrial block (IAB) and abnormal P-wave terminal force in lead V<sub>1</sub> (PTFV<sub>1</sub>) are electrocardiographic (ECG) abnormalities that have been shown to be associated with new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) and death. However, their prognostic importance has not been proven in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) recipients. <b><i>Objective:</i></b> To assess if IAB and abnormal PTFV<sub>1</sub> are associated with new-onset AF or death in CRT recipients. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> CRT recipients with sinus rhythm ECG at CRT implantation and no AF history were included (<i>n</i> = 210). Automated analysis of P-wave duration (PWD) and morphology classified patients as having either no IAB (PWD &#x3c;120 ms), partial IAB (pIAB: PWD ≥120 ms, positive P waves in leads II and aVF), or advanced IAB (aIAB: PWD ≥120 ms and biphasic or negative P wave in leads II or aVF). PTFV<sub>1</sub> &#x3e;0.04 mm•s was considered abnormal. Adjusted Cox regression analyses were performed to assess the impact of IAB and abnormal PTFV<sub>1</sub> on the primary endpoint new-onset AF, death, or heart transplant (HTx) and the secondary endpoint death or HTx at 5 years of follow-up. <b><i>Results:</i></b> IAB was found in 45% of all patients and independently predicted the primary endpoint with HR 1.9 (95% CI 1.2–2.9, <i>p</i> = 0.004) and the secondary endpoint with HR 2.1 (95% CI 1.2–3.4, <i>p</i> = 0.006). Abnormal PTFV<sub>1</sub> was not associated with the endpoints. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> IAB is associated with new-onset AF and death in CRT recipients and may be helpful in the risk stratification in the context of heart failure management. Abnormal PTFV<sub>1</sub> did not demonstrate any prognostic value.

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
J Jacobsson ◽  
J Carlson ◽  
C Reitan ◽  
R Borgquist ◽  
P.G Platonov

Abstract Background Interatrial block (IAB) and abnormal P-wave terminal force in lead V1 (PTFV1) are electrocardiographic (ECG) abnormalities associated with new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) and death. However, their prognostic importance has not been proven in CRT recipients with advanced heart failure (HF). Purpose To assess if IAB and abnormal PTFV1 are associated with new-onset AF or death in CRT recipients. Methods CRT recipients without AF history before CRT implantation were included (n=210, median age 67 years, 80% male, 55% ischemic heart disease, 70% NYHA Class III/IV, median LVEF 25%, 51% CRT-P). Automated analysis of P-wave duration (PWD) and morphology classified patients as having either No IAB (PWD &lt;120ms), Partial IAB (pIAB: PWD ≥120 ms, positive P waves in leads II and aVF) or Advanced IAB (aIAB: PWD ≥120 ms and biphasic or negative P wave in leads II or aVF). PTFV1 &gt;0.04 mm·s was considered abnormal. Cox regression analyses adjusted for age, NYHA Class, ischemic etiology of HF, LBBB, LVEF and CRT-P vs. CRT-D were performed to assess the impact of IAB and abnormal PTFV1 on the primary endpoint new-onset AF, death or heart transplant (HTx) and the secondary endpoint death or HTx at 5 years of follow up. Results IAB was found in 45% (34% pIAB and 11% aIAB) and was associated with both the primary (HR 1.9, 95% CI 1.2–2.9, p=0.004) and the secondary (HR 2.1, 95% CI 1.2–3.4, p=0.006) endpoints. Abnormal PTFV1 was not associated with outcome. See Forest plot for adjusted HRs for individual P-wave indices. Conclusions IAB is associated with new-onset AF and death in CRT recipients and may be helpful in risk stratification in the context of HF management. Abnormal PTFV1 did not demonstrate any prognostic value in the setting of CRT-treated patients with advanced HF. Forest plot Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): Swedish Heart and Lung Foundation


Heart Rhythm ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 305-310 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Jan Willem Borleffs ◽  
Claudia Ypenburg ◽  
Rutger J. van Bommel ◽  
Victoria Delgado ◽  
Lieselot van Erven ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document