scholarly journals Endobronchial Valve (Zephyr) Treatment in Homogeneous Emphysema: One-Year Results from the IMPACT Randomized Clinical Trial

Respiration ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Ralf Eberhardt ◽  
Dirk-Jan Slebos ◽  
Felix J.F. Herth ◽  
Kaid Darwiche ◽  
Manfred Wagner ◽  
...  

<b><i>Rationale:</i></b> The long-term safety and effectiveness of bronchoscopic lung volume reduction with Zephyr endobronchial valves in subjects with severe homogeneous emphysema with little to no collateral ventilation beyond 3 months have yet to be established. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Ninety-three subjects were randomized to either bronchoscopic lung volume reduction with Zephyr valves or standard of care (SoC) (1:1). Zephyr valve subjects were assessed at 3, 6, and 12 months. SoC subjects were assessed at 3 and 6 months; they were then offered crossover to Zephyr valve treatment. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The mean group difference (Zephyr valve – SoC) for change in FEV<sub>1</sub> from baseline to 6 months was 16.3 ± 22.1% (mean ± SD; <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001). Secondary outcomes showed the mean between-group difference for the six-minute walk distance of +28.3 ± 55.3 m (<i>p</i> = 0.016); St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire, −7.51 ± 9.56 points (<i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001); modified Medical Research Council, −0.42 ± 0.81 points (<i>p</i> = 0.019); BODE index, −0.85 ± 1.39 points (<i>p</i> = 0.006); and residual volume of −430 ± 830 mL (<i>p</i> = 0.011) in favor of the Zephyr valve group. At 6 months, there were significantly more responders based on the minimal clinically important difference for these same measures in the Zephyr valve versus the SoC group. The clinical benefits were persistent at 12 months. The percentage of subjects with respiratory serious adverse events was higher in the Zephyr valve group compared to SoC during the first 30 days post-procedure but not statistically different for the Zephyr valve and SoC groups from 31 days to 6 months, and stable in the Zephyr valve group out to 12 months. There were 2 deaths in the SoC group in the 31-day to 6-month period and none in the Zephyr valve group out to 12 months. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction with Zephyr valves in subjects with severe homogeneous emphysema and little to no collateral ventilation provides clinically meaningful change from baseline in lung function, quality of life, exercise capacity, dyspnea, and the BODE index at 6 months, with benefits maintained out to 12 months.

Respiration ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Karin Sanders ◽  
Karin Klooster ◽  
Lowie E.G.W. Vanfleteren ◽  
Guy Plasqui ◽  
Anne-Marie Dingemans ◽  
...  

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Hypermetabolism and muscle wasting frequently occur in patients with severe emphysema. Improving respiratory mechanics by bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (BLVR) might contribute to muscle maintenance by decreasing energy requirements and alleviating eating-related dyspnoea. <b><i>Objective:</i></b> The goal was to assess the impact of BLVR on energy balance regulation. <b><i>Design:</i></b> Twenty emphysematous subjects participated in a controlled clinical experiment before and 6 months after BLVR. Energy requirements were assessed: basal metabolic rate (BMR) by ventilated hood, total daily energy expenditure (TDEE) by doubly labelled water, whole body fat-free mass (FFM) by deuterium dilution, and physical activity by accelerometry. Oxygen saturation, breathing rate, and heart rate were monitored before, during, and after a standardized meal via pulse oximetry and dyspnoea was rated. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Sixteen patients completed follow-up, and among those, 10 patients exceeded the minimal clinically important difference of residual volume (RV) reduction. RV was reduced with median (range) 1,285 mL (−2,430, −540). Before BLVR, 90% of patients was FFM-depleted despite a normal BMI (24.3 ± 4.3 kg/m<sup>2</sup>). BMR was elevated by 130%. TDEE/BMR was 1.4 ± 0.2 despite a very low median (range) daily step count of 2,188 (739, 7,110). Following BLVR, the components of energy metabolism did not change significantly after intervention compared to before intervention, but BLVR treatment decreased meal-related dyspnoea (4.1 vs. 1.7, <i>p</i> = 0.019). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Impaired respiratory mechanics in hyperinflated emphysematous patients did not explain hypermetabolism. <b><i>Clinical Trial Registry Number:</i></b> NCT02500004 at www.clinicaltrial.gov.


CHEST Journal ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 129 (4) ◽  
pp. 873-878 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephan Imfeld ◽  
Konrad E. Bloch ◽  
Walter Weder ◽  
Erich W. Russi

Respiration ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 80 (5) ◽  
pp. 419-425 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Gompelmann ◽  
R. Eberhardt ◽  
G. Michaud ◽  
A. Ernst ◽  
F.J.F. Herth

CHEST Journal ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 160 (4) ◽  
pp. A1876
Author(s):  
T. David Koster ◽  
Karin Klooster ◽  
Hallie McNamara ◽  
Narinder SHARGILL ◽  
Sri Radhakrishnan ◽  
...  

Lung ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 198 (5) ◽  
pp. 795-801
Author(s):  
Marlies van Dijk ◽  
Karin Klooster ◽  
Jorine E. Hartman ◽  
Nick H. T. ten Hacken ◽  
Dirk-Jan Slebos

Abstract Background and Purpose In patients with severe emphysema, dynamic hyperinflation is superimposed on top of already existing static hyperinflation. Static hyperinflation reduces significantly after bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (BLVR). In this study, we investigated the effect of BLVR compared to standard of care (SoC) on dynamic hyperinflation. Methods Dynamic hyperinflation was induced by a manually paced tachypnea test (MPT) and was defined by change in inspiratory capacity (IC) measured before and after MPT. Static and dynamic hyperinflation measurements were performed both at baseline and 6 months after BLVR with endobronchial valves or coils (treatment group) or SoC (control group). Results Eighteen patients underwent BLVR (78% female, 57 (43–67) years, FEV1 25(18–37) %predicted, residual volume 231 (182–376) %predicted). Thirteen patients received SoC (100% female, 59 (44–74) years, FEV1 25 (19–37) %predicted, residual volume 225 (152–279) %predicted. The 6 months median change in dynamic hyperinflation in the treatment group was: + 225 ml (range − 113 to + 803) (p < 0.01) vs 0 ml (− 1067 to + 500) in the control group (p = 0.422). An increase in dynamic hyperinflation was significantly associated with a decrease in residual volume (r = − 0.439, p < 0.01). Conclusion Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction increases the ability for dynamic hyperinflation in patients with severe emphysema. We propose this is a consequence of improved static hyperinflation.


CHEST Journal ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 116 (3) ◽  
pp. 693-696 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Mazolewski ◽  
J.F. Turner ◽  
Mindy Baker ◽  
Terry Kurtz ◽  
Alex G. Little

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document