Immediate Implant Placement After Removal of Maxillary Impacted Canine Teeth: A Technical Note

2016 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 191-194 ◽  
Author(s):  
Federica Demarosi ◽  
Elena Varoni ◽  
Lia Rimondini ◽  
Antonio Carrassi ◽  
Giulio Leghissa
Keyword(s):  
Technical Note ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Impacted Canine ◽  
Immediate Implant ◽  
Impacted Canine Teeth ◽  
Maxillary Impacted Canine

scholarly journals The assesment of pattern of maxillary canine impaction in the Ardabil city

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emran Hajimohammadi ◽  
Hesam Mikaili Khiavi ◽  
Abbas Naghizadeh Baghi ◽  
Vahid Khalili ◽  
Sheida Zohoori
Keyword(s):  
Root Resorption ◽  
Treatment Plan ◽  
Maxillary Canine ◽  
Impacted Tooth ◽  
Impacted Teeth ◽  
Adjacent Structures ◽  
Root Curvature ◽  
Impacted Canine ◽  
Impacted Canine Teeth ◽  
Maxillary Impacted Canine

Background & Objective: Impacted teeth are one of the most common reasons for visit- ing dentists and maxillofacial surgeons. During clinical and radiographic examinations and evalu- ations, the dentist sometimes realizes that the patient’s problem is due to the impaction of one or more teeth. Therefore, it is necessary for every dentist to make the necessary and correct decision for the treatment of such teeth. One of the best ways to diagnose impacted teeth is first of all the absence of that tooth in the desired location and clinical evaluation of the patient and secondly to check the radiographic view of the desired area. Impacted teeth can be the source of many prob- lems for various reasons, so in most cases, their extraction is recommended. Knowing how to place the impacted tooth and determining its type and other characteristics of the impaction can help the dentist in choosing the appropriate treatment-surgical method and also prevent complications during surgery. Proper and timely diagnosis of impaction as well as determining its position (buc- cal-palatal-intermediate) in the jawbone can reduce damage to adjacent structures and also affect the treatment plan. Because accurate detection of impacted tooth positions is possible with radiog- raphy, the most accurate radiograph to examine the impacted tooth is cbct images. Therefore, due to possible occlusion injuries and the effect of occlusion pattern on the treatment of these teeth, it is important to study the types of impaction patterns. Therefore, this study was presented with the aim of investigating the impaction pattern of maxillary canine teeth in Ardabil with cbct archive. Materials and Methods: In this descriptive cross-sectional study, CBCT images of 239 patients who met the inclusion criteria were evaluated. Due to the lack of statistics, due to the lack of statistics of maxillary impacted canine teeth in Ardabil, the counting method was used for sampling and stereotypes were identified as maxillary impacted canine teeth as the sample size. The obtained data were analyzed in SPSS24 software. Results: Among the impacted canine teeth studied, 63.2% had palatal, 17.5% buccal and 19.3% had intermediate pattern. Also, 11.2% had damage to adjacent structures and 88.8% had no damage to adjacent structures. Among the types of damage to adjacent structures, 46.9% caused root re- sorption of the first premolars, 34.5% caused root canal resorption, and 18.6% had other damage to adjacent structures. Of these, 50.4% had root curvature and 49.6% had no root curvature, of which 12.1% had severe curvature, 38.7% had mild curvature and 49.2% had severe curvature. Also, the average angle of the incised canine to the lateral incisor was 41.7%. 9% of impacted canine teeth had a root resorption of lateral incisors and 9% did not have a root resorption of lateral incisors. Conclusion: Dentists should treat cases such as maxillary latent canine such as: Examine the occlusion pattern, angle to adjacent teeth, damage to adjacent structures, curvature of the incised canine root, and root resorption of adjacent teeth.

Minimally Invasive Aesthetic Area Tooth Removal Using Bioextractor® and Immediate Implant Placement with Provisionalization: Case Report

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (6) ◽  
pp. 31-35
Author(s):  
Sergio Charifker Ribeiro Martins ◽  
Leandro Lecio de Lima Souza ◽  
Karen Christina Soares Tenório ◽  
José Ricardo Mariano ◽  
Ricardo Alberto Heine
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Immediate Implant ◽  
Tooth Removal

scholarly journals Risk assessment of labial bone perforation in the anterior mandibular region: a virtual immediate implant placement study

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yi-Wen Cathy Tsai ◽  
Ren-Yeong Huang ◽  
Chia-Dan Cheng ◽  
Wan-Chien Cheng ◽  
David L. Cochran ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Estimating Equation ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Multivariable Logistic Regression Analysis ◽  
Bone Thickness ◽  
Cavity Depth ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Anterior Teeth ◽  
Confounding Variables ◽  
Mandibular Region ◽  
Immediate Implant

Abstract Background This study investigated the prevalence of labial bone perforation (LBP) related to the associated anatomic factors in anterior mandibular region using a virtual immediate implant placement procedure. Methods Series qualified CBCT images of 149 participants (894 teeth) were selected to analyze the assigned anatomical parameters, including concavity depth, concavity angle, torque, and deep bone thickness. Four classes of crestal and radicular dentoalveolar bone phenotypes (CRDAPs) of mandibular anterior teeth were categorized according to the thickness of dentoalveolar bone at both crestal and radicular zones. Data were adjusted for categorical (gender and CRDAP) and continuous (age, cavity angle, cavity depth, and deep bone thickness) variables using a multivariable logistic regression analysis with generalized estimating equation method. Results The overall probability of LBP after virtual implant placement was 21.6%. There is statistically significant higher prevalence of LBP at canine (28.5%) and CRDAP class II (29.2%) regions (p < 0.001). After adjusting confounding variables, CRDAP class II and class IV regions are more likely to have LBP when compared with CRDAP class I (control) regions (p < 0.01). The risk of LBP at canine site is 6.31 times more likely than at the central incisor (control) (p < 0.01). Conclusions Using a virtual immediate implant placement technique, the prevalence of LBP is significantly higher at the mandibular canine site and thin radicular dentoalveolar phenotype in the anterior mandibular region.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document