Alveolar Ridge Preservation in Severely Damaged Molar Socket Using a Polylactic Acid Membrane Without Primary Wound Closure: A Case Series

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (6) ◽  
pp. 1224-1234
Author(s):  
Deng-Hui Duan ◽  
En-Bo Wang ◽  
Yi Zhang ◽  
Hom-Lay Wang
2013 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 71-78 ◽  
Author(s):  
David M Kim ◽  
Nicola De Angelis ◽  
Marcelo Camelo ◽  
Marc L Nevins ◽  
Peter Schupbach ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Silvio Valdec ◽  
Pavla Pasic ◽  
Alex Soltermann ◽  
Daniel Thoma ◽  
Bernd Stadlinger ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Caroliene M. Meijndert ◽  
Gerry M. Raghoebar ◽  
Arjan Vissink ◽  
Henny J. A. Meijer

Abstract Background Clinical studies of single-tooth replacement in compromised bone using bone level tapered implants in the aesthetic zone are scarce. Aim To assess clinically, radiographically and aesthetically over 1 year the performance of a bone level tapered implant in the maxillary aesthetic zone in sites after alveolar ridge preservation. Material and methods Thirty patients (16 male, 14 female) with a failing tooth and large bone defect after removal received alveolar ridge preservation. After 3 months, implants were placed with immediate provisionalization. Definitive restorations were placed after 3 months. The treatment was evaluated 1 year following the definitive restoration. Results All the patients attended the 1-year follow-up. One implant was lost (96.7% implant survival rate). The mean implant stability quotient value was 68.9 ± 8.74 at implant placement. The mean marginal bone level change was minor (− 0.07 ± 0.12 mm). The mean mid-buccal mucosa changed with + 0.01 ± 0.45 mm. The median Pink Esthetic Score and White Esthetic Score after 1 year were 6 [4; 7] and 8 [7; 9], respectively. The patients’ mean overall satisfaction (0–100 VAS scale) was 86.6 ± 10.3. Conclusion Bone level tapered implants with immediate provisionalization perform well after alveolar ridge preservation in the maxillary aesthetic zone, according to implant stability, clinical, radiographic, aesthetic and patient-centred outcomes. Trial registration NTR, NL8755. Registered on 1 January 2016


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 1853
Author(s):  
João Cenicante ◽  
João Botelho ◽  
Vanessa Machado ◽  
José João Mendes ◽  
Paulo Mascarenhas ◽  
...  

Alveolar ridge resorption is a natural consequence of teeth extraction, with unpleasant aesthetic and functional consequences that might compromise a future oral rehabilitation. To minimize the biological consequences of alveolar ridge resorption, several surgical procedures have been designed, the so-called alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) techniques. One important characteristic is the concomitant use of biomaterial in ARP. In the past decade, autogenous teeth as a bone graft material in post-extraction sockets have been proposed with very interesting outcomes, yet with different protocols of preparation. Here we summarize the available evidence on autogenous teeth as a biomaterial in ARP, its different protocols and future directions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document