Abstract 2355: A Randomized Comparison of Triple Antiplatelet Therapy with Dual Antiplatelet Therapy after Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation: D rug- E luting Stenting Followed by C ilostazol treatment reduces LA te RE stenosis in Patients with DIABETES mellitus: DECLARE - DIABETES Trial

Circulation ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 116 (suppl_16) ◽  
Author(s):  
Seong-Wook Park ◽  
Seung-Whan Lee ◽  
Young-Hak Kim ◽  
Sung-Cheol Yun ◽  
Duk-Woo Park ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Antiplatelet Therapy ◽  
Dual Antiplatelet Therapy ◽  
Group Versus ◽  
Drug Eluting Stent ◽  
Standard Group ◽  
Triple Antiplatelet Therapy ◽  
Patients With Diabetes ◽  
Late Loss ◽  
Drug Eluting

Objectives: To determine whether cilostazol improves the efficacy of drug-eluting stent (DES) in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). Background: Cilostazol has been reported to reduce neointimal hyperplasia and restenosis after bare-metal stent (BMS) implantation. But it is not known that its effect is extrapolated to drug eluting stent (DES) in patients with DM. Methods: This randomized, multicenter, prospective study compared triple antiplatelet therapy (aspirin, clopidogrel and cilostazol, triple group, n=200) and dual antiplatelet therapy (aspirin and clopidogrel, standard group, n=200) for 6 months in patients with DM receiving DES. The primary end point was in-stent late loss at 6-month angiography according to the intention-to-treat principle. Results: The both groups had similar baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics. The in-stent (0.25±0.53 mm vs. 0.38±0.54 mm, p=0.025) and in-segment (0.42±0.48 mm vs. 0.53±0.49 mm, p=0.031) late loss were significantly lower in the triple versus standard group. Six-month in-segment restenosis (8.0% vs. 15.6%, p=0.033) and 9-month target lesion revascularization (TLR) (2.5% vs. 7.0%, p=0.034) was significantly lower in triple group versus standard group. At 9 months, major adverse cardiac events (MACE) including death, myocardial infarction, and TLR had a lower tendency in triple group versus standard group (3.0% vs. 7.0%, p=0.066). Subgroup analysis showed that triple plus SES patients had significantly lower in-segment restenosis (0%, 0/88) than standard plus SES (8%, 7/88, p=0.014), triple plus PES (17.3% 13/75, p<0.001), and standard plus PES (24.1%, 19/79, p<0.001) patients. On the multivariate analysis, SES and the use cilostazol were strong predictors of restenosis and TLR. Conclusions: In patients with DM, compared with dual antiplatelet therapy, triple antiplatelet therapy after DES implantation is associated with a decrease in angiographic restenosis as well as the extent of late luminal loss, resulting in reduced risk of 9-monthTLR.

scholarly journals Patient-tailored Drug-eluting Stent Choice – A Solution for Patients with Diabetes

2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 158
Author(s):  
Roxana Mehran ◽  
Antonio Colombo ◽  
Pieter Stella ◽  
Rafael Romaguera ◽  
Gennaro Sardella ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Unmet Needs ◽  
Dual Antiplatelet Therapy ◽  
Drug Eluting Stents ◽  
Drug Eluting Stent ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary Interventions ◽  
Improved Outcomes ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary ◽  
Patients With Diabetes ◽  
Drug Eluting

Although second-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) have improved outcomes in percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs), important unmet needs remain. Two symposia at EuroPCR 2015 focused on two challenging scenarios. First, patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) have generally inferior outcomes following PCI. The Cre8™ stent (manufactured by CID Spa, member of Alvimedica Group) has shown unique efficacy in subpopulations of patients with DM during clinical trials. A live case in a patient with diabetes illustrated the challenges of complex multivessel disease. Second, optimising stent selection towards devices that have demonstrated complete and early endothelialisation offers the potential to reduce the duration of dual antiplatelet therapy. The Cre8™ DES features a polymer-free platform and has been associated with low rates of in-stent thrombosis.

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients with CAD Undergoing Drug-eluting Stent Implantation: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (44) ◽  
pp. 5739-5745
Author(s):  
Jieqiong Guan ◽  
Wenjing Song ◽  
Pan He ◽  
Siyu Fan ◽  
Hong Zhi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antiplatelet Therapy ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Dual Antiplatelet Therapy ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Drug Eluting Stent ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Risk Of Bleeding ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Drug Eluting

Objective: The aim was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for patients who received percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with a drug-eluting stent. Background: The optimal duration of DAPT to balance the risk of ischemia and bleeding in CAD patients undergoing drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation remains controversial. Methods: PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Clinicaltrials.gov, CNKI and Wanfang Databases were searched for randomized controlled trials of comparing different durations of DAPT after DES implantation. Primary outcomes were major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), and major bleeding, and were pooled by Bayes network meta-analysis. Net adverse clinical and cerebral events were used to estimate the surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) curves. The subgroup analysis based on clinical status, follow-up and area was conducted using traditional pairwise meta-analysis. Results: A total of nineteen trials (n=51,035) were included, involving six duration strategies. The network metaanalysis showed that T2 (<6-month DAPT followed by aspirin, HR:1.51, 95%CI:1.02-2.22), T3 (standard 6-month DAPT, HR:1.47, 95%CI:1.14-1.91), T4 (standard 12-month DAPT, HR:1.41, 95%CI:1.15-1.75) and T5 (18-24 months DAPT, HR:1.47, 95%CI:1.09-1.97) was associated with significantly increased risk of MACCE compared to T6 (>24-month DAPT). However, no significant difference was found in MACCE risk between T1 (<6-month DAPT followed by P2Y12 monotherapy) and T6. Moreover, T5 was associated with significantly increased risk of bleeding compared to T1(RR:3.94, 95%CI:1.66-10.60), T2(RR:3.65, 95%CI:1.32-9.97), T3(RR:1.93, 95%CI:1.21-3.50) and T4(RR:1.89, 95%CI:1.15-3.30). The cumulative probabilities showed that T6(85.0%), T1(78.3%) and T4(44.5%) were the most efficacious treatment compared to the other durations. In the ACS (<50%) subgroup, T1 was observed to significantly reduce the risk of major bleeding compared to T4, but not in the ACS (≥50%) subgroup. Conclusions: Compared with other durations, short DAPT followed by P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy showed non-inferiority, with a lower risk of bleeding and not associated with an increased MACCE. In addition, the risk of major bleeding increased significantly, starting with DAPT for 18-month. Compared with the short-term treatment, patients with ACS with the standard 12-month treatment have a better prognosis, including lower bleeding rate and the decreased risk of MACCE. Due to study's limitations, the results should be verified in different risk populations.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document