Abstract 3044: Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in 168 High-Risk Patients with Symptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis - Single Centre Experience

Circulation ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 118 (suppl_18) ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert H Boone ◽  
Lukas A Altwegg ◽  
Jean-Bernard Masson ◽  
Abullah Al Ali ◽  
Saad Al Bugami ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation ◽  
Severe Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Nyha Class ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Transcatheter Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Valve Implantation ◽  
Valve Implantation

Objectives: We describe the outcome of 168 patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis treated with transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). This cohort includes the first in man transarterial and off-pump transapical patients. Methods: The balloon-expandable aortic prosthesis was implanted via the femoral artery or left ventricular apex in 113 and 58 patients respectively. Data are described as 1–57, 58 –114 femoral and 1–58 apical procedures, respectively. Clinical and echocardiographic follow-up occurred at 1, 6, 12, and 24 months. Unsuccessful cases were censored at 30 days. Results: Mean age was 82.5 years (range 50 –97) with 57% males. Procedural success was 94.2% [88%, 96%, & 98%] with no unsuccessful procedures in the last 46 cases. One patient had a successful transfemoral procedure after a prior failure, and 3 patients had successful transapical procedures following failed transfemoral attempts. Logistic EuroSCORE and STS predicted 30-day surgical mortality was 31% [28.4%, 29.1% & 36%], and 10.4% [8.9%, 9.6% & 12.6%] respectively. Observed 30-day mortality was 10.5% [10.5%, 3.5%, & 17.2%], and 0% in the last 39 trans-femoral cases. Intra-procedural mortality was 1.1% [1.8%, 0% & 1.7%]. Peri-procedural stroke occurred in 4% [3.5%, 7%, & 1.7%]. Median hospital stay was 5 days [4, 5, & 7]. Survival at 1, 6, 12 and 24 months was 88%, 80%, 74% [73.9%, 84%, & 65.6%] and 61%. AVA, MG, LVEF and MR significantly improved post TAVI (Table 1 ), and MR, EF, and NYHA class significantly improved during follow-up. MG did not increase during follow-up, but AVA decreased slightly at 1 year (mean difference: 0.2±0.54cm 2 , p=0.04). Mild paravalvular AR was common but severe AR was not observed post-implant or at follow-up. Conclusion: TAVI provides sustained clinical benefit for up to 2 years in patients with symptomatic severe AS and high operative risk. Procedural outcome continues to improve with experience and device development. Table 1: Echocardiographic follow-up

scholarly journals 725 Assessment of myocardial work for the evaluation of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI)

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_G) ◽  
Author(s):  
Isabella Leo ◽  
Jolanda Sabatino ◽  
Antonio Strangio ◽  
Sabrina La Bella ◽  
Sabato Sorrentino ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation ◽  
Severe Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Transcatheter Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Valve Implantation ◽  
Valve Implantation

Abstract Aims A growing number of patients is undergoing transcatheter treatment of severe Aortic Stenosis. Changes in cardiac mechanics after removal of afterload in these patients are under-investigated. Myocardial Work (MW) is emerging as a useful non-invasive correlate of invasively measured myocardial performance and oxygen consumption. Aim of this study was to assess the usefulness of non-invasive MW indices in the clinical assessment of patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Methods and results Consecutive patients with severe aortic stenosis referred for TAVI in a single tertiary centre were included. Echocardiography recordings (GE-Healthcare) with systolic and diastolic non-invasive pressures, were obtained immediately before TAVI and after TAVI to measure myocardial work index (MWI), myocardial constructive work (MCW), myocardial wasted work (MWW), and myocardial work efficiency (MWE). Consecutive patients with severe AS (n = 73) undergoing TAVI and matched controls (n = 50) were included. Mean transaortic gradient, AV area, and peak transvalvular velocity were significantly improved (all P < 0.05). No changes in left ventricular ejection fraction nor in global longitudinal strain (GLS) were observed. GWI (P < 0.001) and GCW (P < 0.001) were significantly reduced after TAVI. On the contrary, we observed no significant change in GWW (P = 0.241) nor GWE (P = 0.854). Women had higher GWI (P = 0.007) and GCW (P = 0.014) compared to men, with a larger delta change of GCW. Patients with a low flow low gradient (LF-LG) AS had lower LVEF (P < 0.001), worse GLS (P < 0.001) and lower baseline GWI (P < 0.001), GCW (P < 0.001), and GWE (P = 0.003). The improvement in GWI and GCW observed after TAVI in the general study population were abolished among LF-LG patients. Conclusions The use of non-invasive myocardial work might be useful to further classify patients with AS and could be useful to predict non responders.

Long-Term Changes in Invasive Physiological Pressure Indices of Stenosis Severity Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Sabbah ◽  
Francis R. Joshi ◽  
Mikko Minkkinen ◽  
Lene Holmvang ◽  
Hans-Henrik Tilsted ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation ◽  
Severe Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Transcatheter Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Valve Implantation ◽  
Artery Disease ◽  
Valve Implantation

Background: Patients with severe aortic stenosis frequently have coexisting coronary artery disease. Invasive hyperemic and nonhyperemic pressure indices are used to assess coronary artery disease severity but have not been evaluated in the context of severe aortic stenosis. Methods: We compared lesion reclassification rates of fractional flow reserve (FFR) and resting full-cycle ratio (RFR) measured before and 6 months after transcatheter aortic valve implantation using the conventional clinical cutoffs of ≤0.80 for FFR and ≤0.89 for RFR. This was a substudy of the ongoing NOTION-3 trial (Third Nordic Aortic Valve Intervention). Two-dimensional quantitative coronary analysis was used to assess changes in angiographic lesion severity. Results: Forty patients were included contributing 50 lesions in which FFR was measured. In 32 patients (36 lesions), RFR was also measured. There was no significant change in diameter stenosis from baseline to follow-up, 49.8% (42.9%–57.1%) versus 52.3% (43.2%–57.8%), P =0.50. RFR improved significantly from 0.88 (0.83%–0.93) at baseline to 0.92 (0.83–0.95) at follow-up, P =0.003, whereas FFR remained unchanged, 0.84 (0.81–0.89) versus 0.86 (0.78–0.90), P =0.72. At baseline, 11 out of 50 (22%) lesions were FFR-positive, whereas 15 out of 50 (30%) were positive at follow-up, P =0.219. Corresponding numbers for RFR were 23 out of 36 (64%) at baseline and 12 out of 36 (33%) at follow-up, P =0.003. Conclusions: In patients with severe aortic stenosis, physiological assessment of coronary lesions with FFR before transcatheter aortic valve implantation leads to lower reclassification rate at 6-month follow-up, compared with RFR.

P1793Eight-year clinical outcome and valve durability after transcatheter aortic valve implantation

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
B Lattuca ◽  
A Meilhac ◽  
C Robert ◽  
D Vandenbergh ◽  
F Manna ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation ◽  
Predictive Factors ◽  
Severe Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Transcatheter Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Valve Implantation ◽  
Valve Implantation

Abstract Background With the growing indications of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) worldwide and among lower risk patients, valve durability has become a crucial issue. Purpose To assess mid and long-term evolution of different generations of percutaneous balloon-expandable prostheses, predictive factors of valve deterioration and its correlation with long-term mortality. Methods All consecutive patients undergoing TAVI for severe aortic stenosis with balloon-expandable prosthesis between 2009 and 2014 and with a minimum follow-up of one-year were included in this monocentric prospective study. All echocardiograms were reviewed by two independent experts. Clinical events were defined according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium criteria. Valve deterioration was defined according to the 2017 EAPCI-ESC-EACTS international consensus statement at the longest follow-up. Results A total of 160 patients were included with a median follow-up of 3.4 years [1.5–4.9] and a maximum of 8 years. Patients were mostly implanted with the first generation Sapien XT valve (n=138, 86.2%). Median age was 85 [79–86] years, with 42.5% of women and a median logistic Euro-SCORE of 14.2% [10.6–23.2]. Immediately after TAVI, mean aortic gradient decreased dramatically from 51±12mmHg to 9±2.6mmHg (p<0.0001) and remained overall stable with a mean gradient of 12±1mmHg at 8 years. Valve deterioration occurred in 5.6% (n=9) of patients, of which 3.7% (n=6) with severe deterioration. Moderate or severe peri-prosthetic aortic regurgitation was observed in 2.5% (n=4) of patients. The eight-year survival rate was 12.9%. During follow-up, hospitalization for acute heart failure was required for 23.7% (n=38) of patients, a myocardial infarction or a stroke occurred respectively among 1.9% (n=3) and 5% (n=8) of patients. After multivariate analysis, size or generation of valves were not independent predictive factors of valve deterioration. Evolution of mean aortic gradient Conclusions After a maximal 8-year follow-up, valve deterioration after balloon-expandable TAVI is very low. In this high-risk population, TAVI seems to be a safe and durable alternative to surgery in severe aortic stenosis regardless of prosthesis generation. Acknowledgement/Funding Edwards Lifesciences

scholarly journals Malignant Findings in Candidates for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. E250-E254
Author(s):  
Hiroshi Kadowaki ◽  
Kazuyuki Yahagi ◽  
Yu Horiuchi ◽  
Kengo Tanabe
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation ◽  
Severe Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Metastatic Cancer ◽  
Transcatheter Aortic Valve ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Aortic Valve Implantation ◽  
Valve Implantation

Background: In candidates for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), preoperative computed tomography (CT) may detect clinically relevant non-cardiac findings. In particular, when malignant findings are detected, patients may be less likely to undergo the procedure. Additionally, they might require further examinations, which may prolong their time to treatment. We investigated how malignant findings affect candidacy for TAVI. Methods: In this single-center retrospective study, 98 patients with severe aortic stenosis who had undergone preoperative CT between September 2013 and October 2016 were evaluated for malignant findings. Results: Seven patients (7.1%) had malignant findings. 74 of 91 patients who did not have malignant findings underwent TAVI, SAVR, or balloon aortic valvuloplasty (81.3%). All patients who had malignant findings underwent TAVI or SAVR, and they underwent the procedure sooner after CT than the rest of the patients (mean time to TAVI or SAVR: 24.6 ± 16.8 versus 48.5 ± 45.4 days; P = .003). All 5 patients who had malignant findings without metastatic cancer and who underwent TAVI were still alive during the follow-up period (the mean duration of the follow-up period was 22.3 ± 8.8 months). However, 1 patient who had a malignant finding with metastatic cancer died 7 months after CT. Conclusion: Our outcomes indicated that the mean duration before TAVI or SAVR was reduced when malignant findings were detected by CT; and TAVI may be a safe and effective treatment for patients with aortic stenosis and a malignant tumor.

scholarly journals Clinical usefulness of relative apical sparing pattern for predicting functional recovery after transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with severe aortic stenosis

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
K Matsuda ◽  
H Okayama ◽  
T Kazatani ◽  
H Okabe ◽  
S Kido ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation ◽  
Longitudinal Strain ◽  
Severe Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Transcatheter Aortic Valve ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Aortic Valve Implantation ◽  
Valve Implantation

Abstract Background Relative apical sparing pattern (RASP) is thought to be associated with prognosis in patients with cardiac amyloidosis or left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). Although almost all patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) have LVH, little is known about the effect of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in patients with severe AS exhibiting a RASP. Purpose This study aimed to elucidate the effect of TAVI on left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LS; LVGLS) in patients with severe AS exhibiting a RASP. Methods Eighty-four patients who underwent transfemoral or subclavian TAVI were evaluated. They were divided into the RASP and non-RASP groups. The average apical LS divided by the sum of the average mid and basal LS values of &gt;1.0 was defined as the RASP. We analyzed the difference between pre- and post-TAVI LVGLS (ΔGLS = post-TAVI LVGLS − pre-TAVI LVGLS). Results Of the 84 patients (mean age, 84.5±3.9 years; 24 men), 15 (17.9%) exhibited a RASP. No significant difference in mean pre-TAVI LVGLS was found between the RASP and non-RASP groups (−16.6% ± 3.8% vs. −15.8% ± 3.9%). The ΔGLS in the RASP group was significantly higher than that in the non-RASP group (−0.97% ± 2.5% vs. −2.6% ± 3.0%; P&lt;0.05). Multivariate analysis revealed that relative apical longitudinal strain was an independent predictor of ΔGLS (β = 0.35, p=0.002). Conclusion Relative apical longitudinal strain was associated with LVGLS recovery. The effect of TAVI on LVGLS in patients with a RASP is inferior to that in patients without a RASP. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document