Abstract 16074: Risk of Blood Transfusion(s) With New Oral Anticoagulants for Short-Term Thromboprophylaxis in Hip and Knee Surgery: Insights From a Meta-Analysis of Fifteen Randomized Trials Including 36,176 Patients

Circulation ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 130 (suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Parasuram Krishnamoorthy ◽  
Saurav Chatterjee ◽  
Jalaj Garg ◽  
Partha Sardar ◽  
Franz Messerli ◽  
...  

Introduction: Blood transfusions have been associated with poor outcomes in cardiac patients. The objective of our study was to systematically examine the overall risk of blood transfusion with new oral anticoagulants (NOACs) and individually in thromboprophylaxis for hip and knee surgery. Hypothesis: Treatment with NOACs is safe for short-term thromboprophylaxis in patients undergoing hip and knee surgery compared with conventional therapy. Methods: PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, EMBASE, EBSCO, Web of Science and CINAHL databases were searched from January 01, 2001 through September 30, 2013. Systemic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the use of NOACs (apixaban, dabigatran and rivaroxaban) with conventional therapy was performed. Clinical and outcome data were extracted from individual studies by 2 independent authors. Primary endpoint of interest was transfusion events in the NOAC and comparator arms. Random effects model was used to pool event rates and results were expressed as risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: Fifteen randomized controlled trials (RCTs) including a total of 36,176 patients were included for analysis. Transfusion events were not higher with use of NOACs in comparison to all comparators in patients undergoing hip and knee surgery- RR 1.02 (95% CI 0.98-1.06), p=0.40. Statistical heterogeneity was negligible (I2=22%). Conclusions: Blood transfusion events with NOAC use were not significantly higher than that with conventional drugs in thromboprophylaxis for hip and knee surgery patients, as noted in evidence from contemporary RCTs.

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lijun Shi ◽  
Haiyun Zhu ◽  
Jinhui Ma ◽  
Li-Li Shi ◽  
Fuqiang Gao ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of intra-articular (IA) magnesium (Mg) for postoperative pain relief after arthroscopic knee surgery. Methods We searched PubMed, Embase, Medline, Cochrane library, and Web of Science to identify randomized controlled trials that compared postoperative pain outcomes with or without IA Mg after knee arthroscopy. The primary outcomes were pain intensity at rest and with movement at different postoperative time points and cumulative opioid consumption within 24 h after surgery. Secondary outcomes included the time to first analgesic request and side effects. Results In total, 11 studies involving 677 participants met the eligibility criteria. Pain scores at rest and with movement 2, 4, 12, and 24 h after surgery were significantly lower, doses of supplementary opioid consumption were smaller, and the time to first analgesic requirement was longer in the IA Mg group compared with the control group. No significant difference was detected regarding adverse reactions between the groups. Conclusions Intra-articular magnesium is an effective and safe coadjuvant treatment for relieving postoperative pain intensity after arthroscopic knee surgery. Protocol registration at PROSPERO: CRD42020156403.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document