Abstract 351: Predictors of Neurological Outcome After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest With Ventricular Fibrillation Witnessed by Emergency Medical Service P.ersonnel., JCS-ReSS Study

Circulation ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 138 (Suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Katsutaka Hashiba ◽  
Yoshio Tahara ◽  
Kazuo Kimura ◽  
Tsutomu Endo ◽  
Kouichi Tamura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Ventricular Fibrillation ◽  
Airway Management ◽  
Neurological Outcome ◽  
Medical Service ◽  
Life Support ◽  
Advanced Life Support ◽  
Advanced Airway ◽  
Favorable Neurological Outcome ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Background: Effective advanced life support is one of the important link in the chain of survival. In Japan, the emergency medical service (EMS) personnel can perform defibrillation, advanced airway management, intravenous access and administration of epinephrine as an advanced life support intervention for the treatment of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). However, whether these interventions performed by EMS improves neurological outcomes remains unclear. Objective: To evaluate predictors of favorable neurological outcome in patients suffering OHCA with ventricular fibrillation (VF) witnessed by an EMS personnel. Methods: The Fire and Disaster Management Agency (FDMA) of Japan developed a nationwide database of a prospective population-based cohort using an Utstein-style template for OHCA patients since January 2005. To evaluate data after the publication of Guideline2010, data from January 2011 to December 2015 of this database was used for the current analysis. A multivariate logistic-regression analysis was performed to assess factors associated with favorable neurological outcome (defined as Cerebral Performance Category 1 or 2) 1 month after cardiac arrest. Results: Of the 629,471 patients documented for the study period, 2,301 adult patients with an OHCA of cardiac origin and VF for the initial rhythm witnessed by an EMS personnel were included in the present analysis. The overall mortality was 49.6%. Rate of return of spontaneous circulation and favorable neurological outcome were 53.4% and 44.8%, respectively. High age (OR0.387, 95%CI0.316-0.472, p<0.001), delayed defibrillation (OR0.598, 95%CI0.493-0.723, p<0.001), advanced airway management (OR0.305, 95%CI0.223-0.413, p<0.001), administration of epinephrine (OR0.356, 95%CI0.213-0.585, p<0.001) and multiple attempts of defibrillation (OR0.484, 95%CI0.402-0.582, p<0.001) were negatively associated with favorable neurological outcome. Conclusion: In patients with VF witnessed by EMS personnel, resuscitation efforts should simply focus on early defibrillation and CPR without advanced interventions.

Abstract 284: Association of Neurological Outcome and Survival With Interventions by Bystander and Emergency Medical Service for Unwitnessed Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Patient; Results From the JCS-ReSS Study

Circulation ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 138 (Suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chisato Okamoto ◽  
Yoshio Tahara ◽  
Atsushi Hirayama ◽  
Satoshi Yasuda ◽  
Teruo Noguchi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Airway Management ◽  
Emergency Medical Service ◽  
Neurological Outcome ◽  
Medical Service ◽  
Favorable Outcome ◽  
Shockable Rhythm ◽  
Advanced Airway ◽  
Bystander Cpr ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Introduction: Although studies have shown that bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in witnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is associated with better neurological prognosis, whether bystander and Emergency Medical Service (EMS) interventions are associated with prognosis in unwitnessed OHCA patients is not fully elucidated. We aimed to investigate the prognostic importance of bystander and EMS interventions among unwitnessed OHCA patients in Japan. Methods and Results: This study was a nation-wide population-based observational study of OHCA in Japan from 2011 to 2015 based on data from the All-Japan Utstein Registry. The outcome measures were neurological outcome and survival at 30-day. The neurologically favorable outcome was defined as Glasgow-Pittsburgh cerebral performance category score 1 or 2. First, to investigate the effectiveness of bystander interventions, we included 105,655 unwitnessed cardiogenic OHCA patients (aged 18-80 years). Of these, 1,614 (1.5%) showed neurologically favorable outcome and 3,273 (3.1%) survived at 30-day. Multivariate logistic regression analysis adjusting for age, sex, geographical region, year and EMS response time showed that bystander CPR was associated with neurologically favorable outcome (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.49, 95% CI 1.35-1.65, P<0.001). Additionally, to investigate the effectiveness of EMS interventions for patients with non-shockable rhythm, we examined 43,342 patients who were performed public CPR and had the initial rhythm of pulseless electrical activity (PEA) or asystole. Of these, 101 (0.2%) showed neurologically favorable outcome and 453 (1.0%) were survival at 30-day. Advanced airway management by EMS was negatively associated with neurologically favorable outcome (aOR 0.55, 95% CI 0.37-0.81, P=0.003) and administration of epinephrine by EMS was associated with survival (aOR 2.35, 95% CI 1.89-2.92, P<0.001). Conclusions: Among unwitnessed OHCA patients, bystander CPR was associated with neurologically favorable prognosis. For unwitnessed OHCA patients with non-shockable rhythm, epinephrine administration was associated with survival, but advanced airway management was negatively associated with neurological outcome.

Abstract 39: Atropine for Patients with Out-Of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Circulation ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 116 (suppl_16) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ken Nagao ◽  
Tetsuya Sakamoto ◽  
Masaki Igarashi ◽  
Shinichi Ishimatsu ◽  
Akira Sato ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Neurological Outcome ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Adjusted Odds Ratio ◽  
Life Support ◽  
Multiple Logistic Regression Analysis ◽  
Pulseless Electrical Activity ◽  
Similar Frequency ◽  
Favorable Neurological Outcome ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

BACKGROUND AHA guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) have recommended that administration of atropine can be considered for asystole or pulseless electrical activity (PEA), because atropine has improved survival to hospital admission in a retrospective review (Ann Emerg Med, 1984), and is inexpensive, easy to administer, and has few side effects. However, there are insufficient data in humans. METHODS We assessed the effects of atropine in 7,443 adults patients with asystole or PEA arrest from the SOS-KANTO study: a prospective, multicenter, observational trial. The medications for asystole or PEA arrest were managed according to the advanced cardiovascular life support algorithm of the CPR guidelines (i.e. a 1-mg dose of epinephrine was administered intravenously every 3 to 5 minutes and a1-mg dose of atropine was administered intravenously every 3 to 5 minutes; maximum total of 3 doses). The primary endpoint was a favorable neurological outcome 30 days after cardiac arrest. RESULTS Of the 7,443 adult patients who had out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with asystole or PEA, I,708(23%) were treated with epinephrine and atropine and 5,735(77%) were treated with epinephrine. At baseline, the epinephrine and atropine group had significantly higher proportions of cardiac cause, witnessed arrest, and bystander CPR attempt than the epinephrine group. However, the two groups had a similar frequency of the favorable neurological outcome (0.3% in each group, p=0.805). Multiple logistic-regression analysis showed that the adjusted odds ratio for the favorable neurological outcome was 0.6 (95% CI 0.2–1.7, p=0.37) after epinephrine and atropine (compared with epinephrine). On the other hand, the epinephrine and atropine group had significantly higher rate of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) than the epinephrine group (35% vs. 23%, p<0.0001), and the adjusted odds ratio for ROSC was 1.6 (95% CI 1.4 –1.7, p<0.0001) after epinephrine and atropine (compared with epinephrine). CONCLUSIONS We demonstrated that administration of atropine during management of asystole or PEA arrest did not increase the frequency of favorable neurological outcome, although the atropine favored initial ROSC.

Abstract 132: Neurological Favorable Outcome Associated With Number of Prehospital Defibrillation Attempts in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Without Return of Spontaneous Circulation on Scene

Circulation ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 138 (Suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Seulki Choi ◽  
Tae Han Kim ◽  
Ki Jeong Hong ◽  
Sung Wook Song ◽  
Joo Jeong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Neurological Outcome ◽  
Life Support ◽  
Discharge Rate ◽  
Spontaneous Circulation ◽  
Successful Resuscitation ◽  
Return Of Spontaneous Circulation ◽  
Hospital Transport ◽  
Favorable Neurological Outcome ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Background: The early and timely defibrillation in shockable rhythm of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) by prehospital EMS providers is crucial for successful resuscitation. In emergency medical service (EMS) system, where advanced cardiac life support could not be fully provided before hospital transport, optimal range of prehospital defibrillation attempts is debatable. We evaluated association between number of prehospital defibrillation attempts and survival outcomes in OHCA patients who were unresponsive to field resuscitation and defibrillations. Methods: This is a retrospective observational study using nationwide OHCA registry of Korea from 2013 to 2016. Adult EMS treated OHCA with presumed cardiac origin with shockable initial ECG rhythm were enrolled. Final analysis was performed in patients who did not achieve return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) on scene before hospital transport. We categorized number of prehospital defibrillation attempt into 3 groups: ≤3 attempts, 4-5 attempts and ≥6 attempts. Primary outcome was favorable neurological outcome at hospital discharge. Multivariable logistic regression modeling was used to evaluate association between neurological outcome and defibrillation attempts. Result: Total 6,679 patients were enrolled for final analyzed. Among total ≤3 defibrillations were attempted in 5015 patients (75.1%), 1050 patients (15.7%) for 4-5 attempts, 614 patient. (9.2%) for ≥6 attempts. Although survival to discharge rate was highest in group with ≤3 defibrillation attempts (8.1% vs. 7.0% vs. 2.9%, p<0.01), survival rate with favorable neurological outcome was highest in group with 4-5 defibrillation attempts (3.0% vs. 4.5% vs. 2.1%, p=0.02). As 4-5 attempts group reference, adjusted odds ratio for favorable neurological outcome of ≤3 attempts was 0.66 (95% CI 0.46 - 0.94) and of ≥6 attempts was 0.47 (95% CI 0.25 - 0.89). Conclusion: For patients with shockable initial cardiac rhythm who were unresponsive to filed defibrillation and resuscitation, moderate amount of defibrillation attempt was associated with favorable neurological outcome compared to fewer defibrillation attempts and prolonged number of defibrillation attempts on scene.

Location of arrest and effect of prehospital advanced airway management after emergency medical service-witnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: nationwide observational study

2019 ◽  
Vol 36 (9) ◽  
pp. 541-547
Author(s):  
Jeong Ho Park ◽  
Kyoung Jun Song ◽  
Sang Do Shin ◽  
Young Sun Ro ◽  
Ki Jeong Hong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Airway Management ◽  
Emergency Medical Service ◽  
Medical Service ◽  
Cerebral Performance Category ◽  
Neurological Recovery ◽  
Multivariable Logistic Regression Analysis ◽  
Emergency Medical ◽  
Advanced Airway ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

ObjectivesTo investigate the association of prehospital advanced airway management (AAM) on outcomes of emergency medical service (EMS)-witnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) according to the location of arrest.MethodsWe evaluated a Korean national OHCA database from 2012 to 2016. Adults with EMS-witnessed, non-traumatic OHCA were included. Patients were categorised into four groups according to whether prehospital AAM was conducted (yes/no) and location of arrest (‘at scene’ or ‘in the ambulance’). The primary outcome was discharge with good neurological recovery (cerebral performance category 1 or 2). Multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted to evaluate the association between AAM and outcome according to the location of arrest.ResultsAmong 6620 cases, 1425 (21.5%) cases of arrest occurred ‘at the scene’, and 5195 (78.5%) cases of arrest occurred ‘in an ambulance’. Prehospital AAM was performed in 272 (19.1%) OHCAs occurring ‘at the scene’ and 645 (12.4%) OHCAs occurring ‘in an ambulance’. Patients with OHCA in the ambulance who had prehospital AAM showed the lowest good neurological recovery rate (6.0%) compared with OHCAs in the ambulance with no AAM (8.9%), OHCA at scene with AAM (10.7%) and OHCA at scene with no AAM (7.7%). For OHCAs occurring in the ambulance, the use of AAM had an adjusted OR of 0.67 (95% CI 0.45 to 0.98) for good neurological recovery.ConclusionOur data show no benefit of AAM in patients with EMS-witnessed OHCA. For patients with OHCA occurring in the ambulance, AAM was associated with worse clinical outcome.

Abstract 141: Defibrillation Protocol Update Neurologically Intact Survival for Patients With Out-Of-Hospital Shockable Cardiac Arrest

Circulation ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 140 (Suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Akihiro Tani ◽  
Ken Nagao ◽  
Yoshio Tahara ◽  
Hiroshi Nonogi ◽  
Naohiro Yonemoto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Airway Management ◽  
Neurological Outcome ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Adjusted Odds Ratio ◽  
Life Support ◽  
Adult Patients ◽  
Multivariable Logistic Regression Analysis ◽  
Advanced Airway ◽  
Neurologically Intact

Background: A series of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) maneuvers of the CoSTR has been updated since first international guidelines was published in 2000. We investigated whether CPR, especially defibrillation protocol, based on the CoSTR update improves neurologically intact survival after shockable out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Methods: From the All-Japan Utstein Registry between 2005 and 2015, we enrolled adult patients with witnessed shockable OHCA. Study patients were divided into 3 groups according to each CPR recommendation era (the Guidelines 2000 group in 2005; 3-stacked-shock protocol era, CoSTR 2005 group between 2006 and 2010; 1-shock protocol [1 shock immediately followed by 2 minutes of CPR] era, and the CoSTR 2010 group between 2006 and 2010; simplified dispatcher chest compressions instruction and 1-shock protocol era). Primary endpoint was favorable 30-day neurological outcome after OHCA. Results: Of the 73,578 study patients, 5,575 (7.6%) received CPR based on the Guidelines 2000, 32,749 (44.5%) the CoSTR 2005, and 35,255 (47.9%) the CoSTR 2010. Crude frequency of favorable 30-day neurological outcome increased significantly whenever the CPR maneuvers were updated (12.3% in the Guidelines 2000 group vs. 19.3% in the CoSTR 2005 group vs. 23.3% in the CoSTR 2010 group, p<0.001). Multivariable logistic-regression analysis for favorable 30-day neurological outcome showed that adjusted odds ratio (reference, the Guidelines 2000 group) was 1.89 (95% CI, 1.72-2.07) in the CoSTR 2005 group and 2.71 (95% CI, 2.47-2.97) in the CoSTR 2010 group. Other independent predictors were age, sex, collapse-to-CPR interval, call-to-scene interval, witnessed and/or bystander CPR status, and cause of cardiac arrest. On the other hand, some advanced life support maneuvers were not acceptable; adjusted odds ratio of 0.37 (95%CI, 0.35-0.39) in advanced airway management (reference, bug-mask ventilation) and 0.36 (95%CI, 0.33-0.38) in intravenous epinephrine (reference, no epinephrine). Conclusions: Defibrillation protocol update based on the CoSTR was the preferable approach to resuscitation for adult patients with witnessed shockable OHCA. However, prehospital epinephrine and advanced airway management were not helpful.

scholarly journals Prehospital Advanced Cardiac Life Support with a Smartphone-Based Direct Medical Oversight in a Metropolitan City, Korea

2021 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Propensity Score Matching ◽  
Neurological Outcome ◽  
Life Support ◽  
Advanced Life Support ◽  
Neurologic Outcome ◽  
Good Neurological Outcome ◽  
Metropolitan City ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is considered an important health care problem because it causes family breakdown and enormous social loss due to sudden death. Despite the efforts of many medical policymakers, paramedics, and doctors, the survival rate after cardiac arrest is only marginally increasing. Objective: This study aimed to determine whether advanced life support (ALS) under physician’s direct medical oversight during an emergency through video call on smartphones was associated with improved out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) outcomes on the "Smart Advanced Life Support (SALS)" pilot project. Methods: This study was conducted using a "Before-After" controlled trial. The OHCA patients were divided into two periods in a metropolitan city. The basic life support (BLS group) and ALS using video calls on smartphones (SALS group) were performed in the 'Before' and 'After' phases in 2014 and 2015, respectively. The OHCA patients over 18 years of age were included in this study. On the other hand, the patients with trauma, poisoning, and family’s unwillingness, as well as those who received no resuscitation were excluded from the study. The primary and secondary outcomes were survival to discharge and a good neurological outcome (cerebral performance category [CPC] 1-2), respectively. A propensity score matching was conducted to equalize potential prognostic factors in both groups. The adjusted odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were calculated for survival to discharge and good neurological outcome. Results: In total, 235 and 198 OHCA patients were enrolled in the BLS and the SALS groups, respectively. The outcomes were better in the SALS group, compared to the BLS group regarding the survival to discharge (9.8% vs. 6.8%, P<0.001) and good neurological outcome (6.6% vs. 4.0%, P<0.001), respectively. Regarding propensity score matching, 304 cases were randomly assigned to the SALS and BLS groups. The survivals to discharge rates after matching were 9.2% and 7.2% in the SALS and the BLS groups, respectively (P=0.06). Furthermore, the good neurological outcome rate was 5.9% in the SALS group versus 3.9% in the BLS group (p=0.008). The adjusted ORs of the SALS group were estimated at 1.33 (95% CI: 1.00-1.77) for survival to discharge and 1.73 (95% CI: 1.19-2.53) for the good neurologic outcome, compared to those in the BLS group. Conclusion: An emergency medical system intervention using the SALS protocol was associated with a significant increase in prehospital ROSC and improved survival and neurologic outcome after OHCA.

Abstract 13106: Improved Outcomes of Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation for Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest - A Community-wide Evaluation

Circulation ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 132 (suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei-Shu Lin ◽  
Matthew Huei-Ming Ma ◽  
Nai-Kuan Chou ◽  
Mei-Fen Yang ◽  
Yu-Wen Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neurological Outcome ◽  
Life Support ◽  
Cerebral Performance Category ◽  
Advanced Life Support ◽  
Spontaneous Circulation ◽  
Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Improved Outcomes ◽  
Advanced Airway ◽  
Bystander Cpr ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Introduction: The patient outcome after OHCA is poor. Return to spontaneous circulation (ROSC) dramatically decreases with the duration of CPR. It has been proposed to implement extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in order to assist CPR (ECPR) in OHCA. Objective: To investigate the effects of ECPR in emergency (ED) for OHCA. Methods: A prospective 4-year observational database collected from a community-wide OHCA registry in an urban EMS was studied. The EMS ambulance staffs were capable with advanced airway, intravenous (iv) fluid skills, basic and advanced life support and AED techniques. Outcomes included 2-hour and 24-hour sustained ROSC, survival (SD) and cerebral performance category scale (CPC) at discharge. OHCA receiving ECPR were included and their pre-hospital (pre-H) and hospital (H) characteristics and outcomes were evaluated by regression analysis. Results: In the 4 years among a total of 7,220 OHCA resuscitated in ED, ECPR was used 88 times (90% male, median age 54 [IQR 44-63]), 90% non-traumatic, 58.6% arrest witnessed, 50.6% with bystander CPR, up to 72.6% initial AED rhythm showing shockable, 54% with LMA (laryngeal mask airway), 5.7% with endotracheal intubation, 18.2% with pre-H iv epinephrine, and 12.5% of them received therapeutic hypothermia. Pre-H time intervals (min:sec, median [IQR]) were 04:38 [03:30-06:08] for response, 13:00 [10:05-16:00] for scene, and 03:08 [02:09-05:00] for transport. Only 10.2% of cases presented pre-H ROSC and 9.1% got ROSC upon H arrival. Outcomes were 88.6% for 2-hr ROSC, 69.3% for 24-hr ROSC, 39.1% for SD, and 21% for good CPC 1or2 respectively. Patients with CPC 1or2 tended to be younger (median age 46.8 vs. 55.9, p=0.04) and less with LMA (29.4 vs. 61.9%, p=0.02). Conclusions: ECPR can lead to survival and good neurological outcome in selected OHCA regardless of positive ROSC at pre-H or upon H arrival after EMS resuscitation. Elder age and pre-H LMA may be adverse to neurological outcome for OHCA with ECPR.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document