Abstract 15078: Non-selective but Not Selective His Bundle Pacing Uniquely Resolves Acute and Chronic Right Bundle Branch Block

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rehan Mahmud ◽  
Shakeel Jamal ◽  
Bdeth Bailey

Introduction: While acute (Ac) right bundle branch block (RBBB) may be in proximal HB (lead fixation injury) and chronic (Ch) RBBB in distal HB, they both cause terminal QRS delay. Both types of RBBB may be corrected with non-selective (NS) His bundle pacing (HBP), however the mechanism is unknown. Hypothesis: To study the role of high (5V) and low (1V) pacing voltage as well as presence of pre-excitation (in NS-HBP) in resolving Ac and chronic Ch-RBBB. Methods: Of the thirty-nine patients (27 ChRBBB and 12 AcRBBB), 25 ChRBBB and 10 AcRBBB patients showed NS-HBP at 5V and 11/25 ChRBBB and 6/12 AcRBBB patients transitioned to selective (S)-HBP at 1V. Four patients showed S-HBP at 5V and 1V. Results: 1)During NS-HBP at 5V: (In 25 ChRBBB and 10 Ac-RBBB) Complete resolution occurred 12/25ChRBBB and in all 10 AcRBBB. A partial resolution of ChRBBB occurred 13/25 ChRBBB.2. During NS-HBP at 1V: (6/14 ChRBBB and 2/4 AcRBBB showed complete resolution at 1V, remainder showed incomplete RBBB3. During S-HBP at 5V : (2 ChRBBB 2 AcRBBB) only 1 AcRBBB showed resolution of RBBB. 4. During S-HBP at 1V : All 13 ChRBBB and 8 AcRBBB did not show resolution os RBBB including 11 Ch-RBBB and 6 Ac-RBBB RBBB which resolved during 5V NS-HBP, abruptly recurred on transition to S-HBP at a mean of 2.4±0.8V. Conclusions: 1)The lack of RBBB resolution with S-HBP suggests that pacing site was proximal to site of block, however, from the same site NS-HBP either completely or incompletely resolved both Ac- and Ch-RBBB. 2) Partial resolution of RBBB in NS-HBP may be explained by right ventricular free wall pre-excitation when site of Ch-RBBB is distal.3) Complete resolution of both acute and Ch-RBBB in NS-HBP, more so at high pacing voltage, suggest that peri-Hisian tissues may behave more like a specialized conduction tract which uniquely resolves conduction block.

Author(s):  
Jorge Gómez-Flores ◽  
Jovana Pérez-Báez ◽  
Guillermo Muñoz ◽  
Gabriela A. Bustillos-García ◽  
Alan García ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 42 (12) ◽  
pp. 1594-1596 ◽  
Author(s):  
Min Gu ◽  
Yiran Hu ◽  
Wei Hua ◽  
Hongxia Niu ◽  
Xiaohong Zhou ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan Sen ◽  
Michael Mok ◽  
Mark Perrin

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is an effective intervention for severe aortic stenosis in patients at intermediate or high surgical risk, but damage to the native conduction system such as left bundle branch block (LBBB) may offset its benefits. New onset LBBB is associated with a higher risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. His-bundle pacing (HBP) may be useful to treat TAVI-induced LBBB but has yet to be reported. We present the case of a 76-year-old man with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis treated with TAVI. His preoperative electrocardiogram showed sinus rhythm with a narrow QRS complex. Insertion of a CoreValve Evolut R transcatheter aortic valve was uneventful apart from the development of LBBB with a long PR interval. A dual-lead DDD pacemaker was implanted via the left cephalic vein on the following day. HV was mildly prolonged at 60 ms. Capture of the proximal His restored AV synchrony without correction of LBBB. Repositioning of the lead with capture of the left bundle branch enabled complete ventricular resynchronisation with a single lead. Our case demonstrates that LBBB in the setting of TAVI may be corrected by HBP.


2020 ◽  
Vol 43 (11) ◽  
pp. 1318-1324
Author(s):  
Pablo Moriña‐Vázquez ◽  
Maria Teresa Moraleda‐Salas ◽  
Álvaro Arce‐León ◽  
Juan Manuel Fernández‐Gómez ◽  
José Venegas‐Gamero ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document