scholarly journals Factor V Leiden and the Risk of Bleeding in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes Treated With Antiplatelet Therapy: Pooled Analysis of 3 Randomized Clinical Trials

Author(s):  
Bakhtawar K. Mahmoodi ◽  
Niclas Eriksson ◽  
Stephanie Ross ◽  
Daniel M. F. Claassens ◽  
Folkert W. Asselbergs ◽  
...  

Background Whether factor V Leiden is associated with lower bleeding risk in patients with acute coronary syndromes using (dual) antiplatelet therapy has yet to be investigated. Methods and Results We pooled data from 3 randomized clinical trials, conducted in patients with acute coronary syndromes, with adjudicated bleeding outcomes. Cox regression models were used to obtain overall and cause‐specific hazard ratios (HRs) to account for competing risk of atherothrombotic outcomes (ie, composite of ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction, and cardiovascular death) in each study. Estimates from the individual studies were pooled using fixed effect meta‐analysis. The 3 studies combined included 17 623 patients of whom 969 (5.5%) were either heterozygous or homozygous (n=23) carriers of factor V Leiden. During 1 year of follow‐up, a total of 1289 (7.3%) patients developed major (n=559) or minor bleeding. Factor V Leiden was associated with a lower risk of combined major and minor bleeding (adjusted cause‐specific HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.56–1.00; P =0.046; I 2 =0%) but a comparable risk of major bleeding (adjusted cause‐specific HR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.62–1.39; P =0.73; I 2 =0%). Adjusted pooled cause‐specific HRs for the association of factor V Leiden with atherothrombotic events alone and in combination with bleeding events were 0.75 (95% CI, 0.55–1.02; P =0.06; I 2 =0%) and 0.75 (95% CI, 0.61–0.92; P =0.007; I 2 =0%), respectively. Conclusions Given that the lower risk of bleeding conferred by factor V Leiden was not counterbalanced by a higher risk of atherothrombotic events, these findings warrant future assessment for personalized medicine such as selecting patients for extended or intensive antiplatelet therapy.

Heart ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 103 (15) ◽  
pp. 1168-1176 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joakim Alfredsson ◽  
Benjamin Neely ◽  
Megan L Neely ◽  
Deepak L Bhatt ◽  
Shaun G Goodman ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 67 (4) ◽  
pp. 30-39
Author(s):  
A. D. Erlikh

The term registry in individual application to patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is discussed in this review. The author performs a detailed analysis of literature concerning objectives and goals of registries and their significance in clinical practice. The marked differences can be found between registries and randomized clinical trials (RCT). After the example of ACS registries the author shows the influence of information received according to registries limits on the formation of recommendations on treatment of patients with ACS.


2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 465-477 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alfredo E. Rodriguez ◽  
Alfredo M. Rodriguez-Granillo ◽  
Sergio D. Ascarrunz ◽  
Francisco Peralta-Bazan ◽  
Mi Y. Cho

Background: According to ACC/ AHA guidelines, a minimum of 1 year of dual anti- platelet therapy (DAPT) consisting of aspirin and a platelet ADP-receptor antagonist (P2Y12 inhibitor) is recommended for patients presenting acute coronary syndromes (ACS), regardless of which type of revascularization is performed during the acute event. Methods: The purpose of this presentation was to review the present data either from a direct randomized comparison among the three compounds and also large prospective observational registries and meta-analysis were analyzed in detail. With this aim, we performed an extensive large search from PubMed/Medline Journals identifying studies comparing fashion the new P2Y12 inhibitors in patients with ACS including ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in direct and indirect manner. Results: Pivotal large randomized clinical trials (RCT) in patients with ACS including STEMI, comparing clopidogrel, a first generation P2Y12 inhibitor against the newer prasugrel and ticagrelor showed major efficacy advantages of the latters although both drugs had more bleeding risk than clopidogrel. Direct comparisons of prasugrel and ticagrelor from large RCT are not yet available, however, several observational registries and metaanalysis reported results from an indirect comparison between both compounds. Major findings and limitations of each of these studies were identified, highlighted and discussed. Conclusion: Prasugrel and ticagrelor are both more effective than clopidogrel to prevent adverse cardiac events in patients with ACS. Compared to ticagrelor, prasugrel appears to be more effective in patients with STEMI, although lack of randomized data didn’t allow to draw definitive conclusions.


2012 ◽  
Vol 64 (6) ◽  
pp. 570-575 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Himabindu ◽  
D. Rajasekhar ◽  
K. Latheef ◽  
P.V.G.K. Sarma ◽  
V. Vanajakshamma ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Sarabjeet Singh ◽  
Mukesh Singh ◽  
Harneet Pahwa ◽  
Evyan Jawad ◽  
Sandeep Khosla ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document