Abstract W P75: New Generation Hydrogel Endovascular Aneurysm Treatment Trial

Stroke ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 46 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Samer G Zammar ◽  
Youssef J Hamade ◽  
Jennifer Ward ◽  
Byron K Yip ◽  
Nicole Reinholdt ◽  
...  

Background: Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms has seen significant advances. One major limitation of the endovascular approach is durability of treatment and aneurysm recanalization. To address this issue, one approach was the development of hydrogel-coated coils. Hydrogel expands upon exposure to blood and thus enhances coil packing density. Higher initial coil packing density may potentially result in lower rates of recurrence. Hypothesis: The 2nd Generation HydroCoil Embolic System allows for a higher packing density, higher initial occlusion, lower recanalization, and lower retreatment rates compared to bare platinum coils. Objective: To compare clinical and angiographic outcomes (initial complete occlusion, recanalization, retreatment, and adverse event rates) in patients receiving the 2nd Generation HydroCoil Embolic System versus patients receiving bare platinum coils. Methods: This is a randomized, controlled, multicenter, post-market clinical trial. Subjects between 18 and 75 years of age with ruptured or unruptured intracranial aneurysms (3-14 mm in size) who are amenable to endovascular treatment are randomly assigned 1:1 to one of two treatment arms: 1) the HydroCoil Embolic System (HES), or 2) bare platinum coils. No bioactive coils, 1st generation HydroCoils or liquid embolics are allowed in the study. In the HES arm, up to 10% of total coil length using bare platinum is allowed if deemed necessary by the investigator. Any type of bare platinum coil may be utilized in the bare platinum arm. Assist-devices can be used at the discretion of the investigator. The duration of the open enrollment phase will be 24 months or until the required number of subjects are enrolled (n = 600). Each subject will have a post-procedure follow-up of at least 18 months. Subjects will be recruited from up to 50 national and international centers. Each Investigational Site will be expected to enroll at least 20 Subjects. Results: A total of 368 patients have been enrolled to date in the study. The study is still ongoing. Conclusions: A limitation of endovascular aneurysm treatment is recurrence. This trial aims to answer the question of whether the new generation hydrogel coil reduces recurrence rates when compared to bare platinum coils.

Neurosurgery ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 62 (6) ◽  
pp. 1405
Author(s):  
Michelle J. Smith ◽  
Kyle Chapple ◽  
Justin Mascitelli ◽  
Philip E. Stieg ◽  
Howard A. Riina ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Liebig ◽  
H. Henkes ◽  
S. Fischer ◽  
W. Weber ◽  
E. Miloslavski ◽  
...  

Between 1992 and 2003, a total of 2029 aneurysms in 1748 patients were treated by endovascular occlusion with electrolytically detachable coils. In this series, electrolytically detachable platinum coils with Nylon fibers (Sapphire Detachable Coil System, MTI, Irvine, CA, USA) were used in 474 aneurysms solely or in combination with bare coils from various manufacturers. To determine the safety and clinical efficacy of Nylon fibered coils for the endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms in comparison to bare platinum coils a thorough retrospective statistical analysis by means of logistic regression and matched pairs analysis was performed. Only treatments with data for all matching variables were used, resulting in 421 matched pairs. The analysis was performed with respect to clinical status and numerous parameters concerning individual aneurysm characteristics (e.g., location, neck width, fundus diameter). Treatment-related parameters included the use and percentage of fibered coils, occlusion rate, procedural complications, early clinical outcome and Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) scores. Finally, long-term follow-up results (particularly recurrence, cause of recurrence and post treatment haemorrhage) were evaluated. Both logistic regression and matched pairs analysis sho wed a statistically improved occlusion rate if fibered coils had been used (96% largely occluded with the use of fibered coils vs. 84–85% with the exclusive use of bare coils). However, the amount of fibered coils calculated as percentage of coil length did not seem to have significant impact. Procedures with fibered coils did not lead to a higher rate of thromboembolic events (8.0% for fibered vs. 10.5% for bare coils). The apparently better clinical outcome in the group treated with fibered coils determined by both postprocedural outcome and GOS, did not reach statistical significance. Analysis of the anatomical properties showed no differences between the groups treated with bare and fibered coils in terms of neck width, fundus diameter, and anatomic location. As expected, a higher occlusion rate was achieved in aneurysms with smaller neck and fundus independent from the type of coil used. On follow up angiography, there was an apparently lower rate of recurrence secondary to coil compaction in the group treated with fibered coils, but these data were compromised by the fact that up to date only about one third of 474 aneurysms treated with fibered coils had undergone angiographic follow-up and this did not reach statistical significance. From our experiences, we conclude that the use of fibered electrolytically detachable platinum coils in aneurysm treatment leads to significantly improved occlusion rates compared to the sole use of bare platinum coils. We hope that with increasing follow-up data we will be able to confirm that the apparently reduced recurrence rates for aneurysms treated with fibered coils can be proven with statistical significance.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document