Abstract WP372: The Acute ICH Growth Score: Simple and Accurate Predictor of Hematoma Expansion in Patients with Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage

Stroke ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 48 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
F S Al-Ajlan ◽  
A M Demchuk ◽  
R I Aviv ◽  
D Rodriguez-Luna ◽  
C Molina ◽  
...  

Background and Purpose: Acute intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) hematoma expansion predicts high mortality and morbidity, occurring in a third of patients presenting with this condition. Recent studies correlated ultra-early hematoma growth and hematoma morphologic appearance with ICH expansion. Our purpose was to develop simple and clinically useful score that would predict ICH hematoma expansion accurately. Methods: This cohort included patients with primary or anticoagulation-associated ICH patients presenting <6 hours post ictus prospectively enrolled in the PREDICT study. Patients underwent baseline CT, CT angiography and 24-hour CT for hematoma expansion analysis. A risk score model was developed for predicting hematoma expansion (> 6 ml or > 33%). A 7-point acute ICH growth score was based on ultra-early hematoma growth > 5 mL/hour (yes=1), irregular morphology (yes=1), density heterogeneity (yes=1), presence of fluid-blood levels (yes=1), spot sign (yes=1), and use of anticoagulation (yes=2). Discrimination of the expansion score was assessed. Results: We retrospectively studied 301 primary or anticoagulation-associated intracerebral hemorrhage patients. The 7-point acute ICH growth score demonstrated good discrimination for hematoma expansion>6 mL or 33% (area under the curve of 0.76). Median and significant HE are shown in the table below (p<0.001). Conclusions: In a multicenter prospective study, the ICH expansion score demonstrate good correlation with hematoma expansion, and included recently reported variables such as morphology and ultraearly growth.

Stroke ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Ovesen ◽  
Janus Christian Jakobsen ◽  
Christian Gluud ◽  
Thorsten Steiner ◽  
Zhe Law ◽  
...  

Background and Purpose: The computed tomography angiography or contrast-enhanced computed tomography based spot sign has been proposed as a biomarker for identifying on-going hematoma expansion in patients with acute intracerebral hemorrhage. We investigated, if spot-sign positive participants benefit more from tranexamic acid versus placebo as compared to spot-sign negative participants. Methods: TICH-2 trial (Tranexamic Acid for Hyperacute Primary Intracerebral Haemorrhage) was a randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial recruiting acutely hospitalized participants with intracerebral hemorrhage within 8 hours after symptom onset. Local investigators randomized participants to 2 grams of intravenous tranexamic acid or matching placebo (1:1). All participants underwent computed tomography scan on admission and on day 2 (24±12 hours) after randomization. In this sub group analysis, we included all participants from the main trial population with imaging allowing adjudication of spot sign status. Results: Of the 2325 TICH-2 participants, 254 (10.9%) had imaging allowing for spot-sign adjudication. Of these participants, 64 (25.2%) were spot-sign positive. Median (interquartile range) time from symptom onset to administration of the intervention was 225.0 (169.0 to 310.0) minutes. The adjusted percent difference in absolute day-2 hematoma volume between participants allocated to tranexamic versus placebo was 3.7% (95% CI, −12.8% to 23.4%) for spot-sign positive and 1.7% (95% CI, −8.4% to 12.8%) for spot-sign negative participants ( P heterogenity =0.85). No difference was observed in significant hematoma progression (dichotomous composite outcome) between participants allocated to tranexamic versus placebo among spot-sign positive (odds ratio, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.29 to 2.46]) and negative (odds ratio, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.41 to 1.45]) participants ( P heterogenity =0.88). Conclusions: Data from the TICH-2 trial do not support that admission spot sign status modifies the treatment effect of tranexamic acid versus placebo in patients with acute intracerebral hemorrhage. The results might have been affected by low statistical power as well as treatment delay. REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.controlled-trials.com ; Unique identifier: ISRCTN93732214.


2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 326-331 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liping Liu ◽  
Yilong Wang ◽  
Xia Meng ◽  
Na Li ◽  
Ying Tan ◽  
...  

Rationale Acute intracerebral hemorrhage inflicts a high-economic and -health burden. Computed tomography angiography spot sign is a predictor of hematoma expansion, is associated with poor clinical outcome and is an important stratifying variable for patients treated with haemostatic therapy. Aims We aim to compare the effect of treatment with tranexamic acid to placebo for the prevention of hemorrhage growth in patients with high-risk acute intracerebral hemorrhage with a positive spot sign. Design The tranexamic acid for acute intracerebral hemorrhage growth predicted by spot sign (TRAIGE) is a prospective, multicenter, placebo-controlled, double-blind, investigator-led, randomized clinical trial that will include an estimated 240 participants. Patients with intracerebral hemorrhage demonstrating symptom onset within 8 h and with the spot sign as a biomarker for ongoing hemorrhage, and no contraindications for antifibrinolytic therapy, will be enrolled to receive either tranexamic acid or placebo. The primary outcome measure is the presence of hemorrhage growth defined as an increase in intracerebral hemorrhage volume >33% or >6 ml from baseline to 24 ± 2 h. The secondary outcomes include safety and clinical outcomes. Conclusion The TRAIGE trial evaluates the efficacy of haemostatic therapy with tranexamic acid in the prevention of hemorrhage growth among high-risk patients with acute intracerebral hemorrhage.


Stroke ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 38 (4) ◽  
pp. 1257-1262 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan Wada ◽  
Richard I. Aviv ◽  
Allan J. Fox ◽  
Demetrios J. Sahlas ◽  
David J. Gladstone ◽  
...  

Stroke ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 44 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Thien J Huynh ◽  
Andrew Demchuk ◽  
Dar Dowlatshahi ◽  
Ölem Krischek ◽  
Alex Kiss ◽  
...  

Background and Purpose: The spot sign score (SSS) stratifies hematoma expansion risk in patients with acute intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) but is not externally validated. We sought to validate the SSS and assess prognostic spot characteristics associated with hematoma expansion in a prospective multicenter study. Methods: We studied 228 ICH patients presenting < 6 hours post-onset enrolled in the PREDICT (PREdicting hematoma growth anD outcome in ICH using contrast bolus CT) study, a multicentre prospective observational cohort study of ICH patients evaluated with baseline non-contrast CT, CT angiography (CTA), and 24-hour follow-up CT. Primary outcome was significant hematoma expansion (>6ml or >33%). Secondary outcomes were absolute and relative expansion. Blinded CTA spot sign characterization (spot number, maximum axial size and attenuation, and relative attenuation compared to the ipsilateral internal carotid artery and superior sagittal sinus) and SSS calculation was performed independently by two neuroradiologists and a radiology resident. Multivariable regression for prediction of hematoma expansion was performed and diagnostic performance of the SSS and spot characteristics was examined with ROC analysis and tests for trend. Results: SSS independently predicted significant, absolute, and relative hematoma expansion (p-values of 0.001, <0.001, and 0.009, respectively), adjusting for initial hematoma volume, INR, mean arterial pressure, and time from onset-to-baseline CT, and demonstrated near perfect interobserver agreement (κ = 0.82). Spot number and SSS demonstrated similar area under the curve (AUC 0.69 vs. 0.68, p=0.149) for hematoma expansion. Incremental risk of hematoma expansion was demonstrated with increasing SSS however a significant trend was not identified (p trend=0.720). Of all spot characteristics, only spot number was independently associated with expansion (p<0.001) providing incremental risk stratification (p trend=0.050) and near perfect agreement (κ=0.85). Median absolute hematoma growth for 0, 1, 2 to 3, ≥4 spots was 0.4, 4, 12, 82 ml respectively. Conclusion: Spot number is the single best predictor of significant ICH expansion and appears to be as good as the total SSS in predicting expansion.


2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wen-Jie Peng ◽  
Cesar Reis ◽  
Haley Reis ◽  
John Zhang ◽  
Jun Yang

Hematoma expansion (HE) occurs in approximately one-third of patients with intracerebral hemorrhage and leads to high rates of mortality and morbidity. Currently, contrast extravasation within hematoma, termed the spot sign on computed tomography angiography (CTA), has been identified as a strong independent predictor of early hematoma expansion. Past studies indicate that the spot sign is a dynamic entity and is indicative of active hemorrhage. Furthermore, to enhance the spot sign’s accuracy of predicting HE, spot parameters observed on CTA or dynamic CTA were used for its quantification. In addition, spot signs detected on multiphase CTA and dynamic CTA are shown to have higher sensitivity and specificity when compared with simple standardized spot sign detection in recent studies. Based on the spot sign, novel methods such as leakage sign and rate of contrast extravasation were explored to redefine HE prediction in combination with clinical characteristics and spot sign on CTA to assist clinical judgment. The spot sign is an accepted independent predictor of active hemorrhage and is used in both secondary intracerebral hemorrhage and the process of surgical assessment for hemorrhagic risk in patients with ischemic stroke. Spot sign predicts patients at high risk for hematoma expansion.


Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (4) ◽  
pp. 1107-1110 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronda Lun ◽  
Vignan Yogendrakumar ◽  
Andrew M. Demchuk ◽  
Richard I. Aviv ◽  
David Rodriguez-Luna ◽  
...  

Background and Purpose— Patients with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) are often subject to rapid deterioration due to hematoma expansion. Current prognostic scores are largely based on the assessment of baseline radiographic characteristics and do not account for subsequent changes. We propose that calculation of prognostic scores using delayed imaging will have better predictive values for long-term mortality compared with baseline assessments. Methods— We analyzed prospectively collected data from the multicenter PREDICT study (Prediction of Hematoma Growth and Outcome in Patients With Intracerebral Hemorrhage Using the CT-Angiography Spot Sign). We calculated the ICH Score, Functional Outcome in Patients With Primary Intracerebral Hemorrhage (FUNC) Score, and modified ICH Score using imaging data at initial presentation and at 24 hours. The primary outcome was mortality at 90 days. We generated receiver operating characteristic curves for all 3 scores, both at baseline and at 24 hours, and assessed predictive accuracy for 90-day mortality with their respective area under the curve. Competing curves were assessed with nonparametric methods. Results— The analysis included 280 patients, with a 90-day mortality rate of 25.4%. All 3 prognostic scores calculated using 24-hour imaging were more predictive of mortality as compared with baseline: the area under the curve was 0.82 at 24 hours (95% CI, 0.76–0.87) compared with 0.78 at baseline (95% CI, 0.72–0.84) for ICH Score, 0.84 at 24 hours (95% CI, 0.79–0.89) compared with 0.76 at baseline (95% CI, 0.70–0.83) for FUNC, and 0.82 at 24 hours (95% CI, 0.76–0.88) compared with 0.74 at baseline (95% CI, 0.67–0.81) for modified ICH Score. Conclusions— Calculation of the ICH Score, FUNC Score, and modified ICH Score using 24-hour imaging demonstrated better prognostic value in predicting 90-day mortality compared with those calculated at presentation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document