Abstract WP496: Early Mobility in the Neurosurgical Intensive Care Unit: A Quality Improvement Project

Stroke ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 50 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Essie P Mathews ◽  
Allison Huffman ◽  
Venkatesh Aiyagari ◽  
Daiwai Olson
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Quality Improvement Project ◽  
Improvement Project ◽  
Early Mobility ◽  
Neurosurgical Intensive Care ◽  
Neurosurgical Intensive Care Unit

scholarly journals A multidisciplinary early mobility model for cardiac patients in coronary intensive care unit

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
S Matharsa ◽  
D Selvamani ◽  
R Thakur ◽  
P Mathew ◽  
M Thomas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Early Mobilization ◽  
Quality Improvement Project ◽  
Second Phase ◽  
Improvement Project ◽  
Early Mobility ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Ventilated Patients

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements This is an unfunded project Background Early mobilization is considered as a complex task in an intensive care unit (ICU) and patients are often on prolonged bed rest leading to physical deconditioning. Intensive care early mobility programs have been recognized to be safe and have shown positive outcomes. However, implementing early mobility program as a standard of care remains a challenge. Coronary Intensive Care Unit (CICU) provides complex care for cardiac critically ill patients. In February 2018, the CICU multidisciplinary team (MDT) started a quality improvement project to implement early mobility program in the unit. Purpose This project aimed to investigate the feasibility of implementing an Early Mobility Protocol in CICU to increase the number of patients mobilized to more than 95%. Secondary objective was to explore the impact of the protocol on the mobility level of the patients at the time of discharge or transfer from the CICU. Methods A multidisciplinary mobility task force including Physicians, nurses, physiotherapists and respiratory therapists was formed to analyze the barriers in implementing an early mobility program. A staff survey was conducted to identify the need for a standard early mobility protocol. Root cause analysis and Pareto analysis was done. An evidence based early mobility protocol was developed and implemented. All non-mechanical ventilated patients were included in the first phase and all mechanical ventilated patients were included in the second phase of the project. A standard ICU Mobility scale (IMS) was used for scoring the mobility level of the patients. This quality improvement project is based on "Institute for Healthcare Improvement" model. Periodical staff education and training programs about early mobilization were conducted to improve staff confidence. Change ideas were implemented using multiple Plan Do Study Act cycles. Results The total number of patients included from 1st March 2018 till 31st December 2019 was 2356. This included both the genders. In March 2018, only 68% of non-mechanical ventilated patients were mobilized, that reached to 88% by November 2018. This gradually increased to 100% in May 2019 and is currently sustained at 100%. In November 2019, only 50% of mechanical ventilated patients were mobilized which gradually increased to 66.66% and 75% in middle and end of December 2019. The mean IMS score at discharge or transfer from CICU was "8". From patient-family experience survey, 93.75% of patients perceived that the program was helpful in regaining mobility and 96.25% of patients felt that the program helped in regaining their autonomy. Conclusion The result shows that it is safe and feasible to implement an early mobility program in a Coronary Intensive Care Unit. A standardized mobility protocol can lead to efficient mobilization practice facilitating early transfers from ICUs without any complications. This could further enhance the collaboration of the MDT members leading to culture change in ICUs.

Integrating Palliative Care Into a Neurosurgical Intensive Care Unit (NS-ICU): A Quality Improvement (QI) Project

2021 ◽  
pp. 104990912110456
Author(s):  
Choo Hwee Poi ◽  
Mervyn Yong Hwang Koh ◽  
Tessa Li-Yen Koh ◽  
Yu-Lin Wong ◽  
Wendy Yu Mei Ong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Care Team ◽  
Referral Rates ◽  
Care Plans ◽  
Neurosurgical Patients ◽  
Neurosurgical Intensive Care ◽  
Neurosurgical Intensive Care Unit

Objectives: We conducted a pilot quality improvement (QI) project with the aim of improving accessibility of palliative care to critically ill neurosurgical patients. Methods: The QI project was conducted in the neurosurgical intensive care unit (NS-ICU). Prior to the QI project, referral rates to palliative care were low. The ICU-Palliative Care collaborative comprising of the palliative and intensive care team led the QI project from 2013 to 2015. The interventions included engaging key stake-holders, establishing formal screening and referral criteria, standardizing workflows and having combined meetings with interdisciplinary teams in ICU to discuss patients’ care plans. The Palliative care team would review patients for symptom optimization, attend joint family conferences with the ICU team and support patients and families post-ICU care. We also collected data in the post-QI period from 2016 to 2018 to review the sustainability of the interventions. Results: Interventions from our QI project and the ICU-Palliative Care collaborative resulted in a significant increase in the number of referrals from 9 in 2012 to 44 in 2014 and 47 the year later. The collaboration was beneficial in facilitating transfers out of ICU with more deaths outside ICU on comfort-directed care (96%) than patients not referred (75.7%, p < 0.05). Significantly more patients had a Do-Not-Resuscitation (DNR) order upon transfer out of ICU (89.7%) compared to patients not referred (74.2.%, p < 0.001), and had fewer investigations in the last 48 hours of life (p < 0.001). Per-day ICU cost was decreased for referred patients (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Multi-faceted QI interventions increased referral rates to palliative care. Referred patients had fewer investigations at the end-of-life and per-day ICU costs.

scholarly journals Assessing Nurses’ Knowledge of Noise in the Intensive Care Unit: An Educational Intervention Project

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Fortes
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Critical Care ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Educational Intervention ◽  
Quality Improvement Project ◽  
Minimal Risk ◽  
Improvement Project ◽  
Staff Members ◽  
Nurses Knowledge

Noise in the intensive care unit (ICU) has been studied for over thirty years, but it continues to be a significant problem and a top complaint among patients. Staff members are now reporting detrimental health effects from excessive noise. One of the significant factors of inadequate noise control in the ICU is that nurses have insufficient awareness regarding the hospital noise issue and its negative impact on health status. The level of knowledge of clinical staff on the topic of noise is not known. A quality improvement project to explore noise in the ICU could facilitate better understanding of the phenomenon and formulation of new ways to continue to reduce noise at a community hospital in Massachusetts. The purpose of this quality improvement project was to evaluate nurses’ knowledge of the potentially harmful effects of noise on patients as well as on nurses, to identify opportunities for improvement of the environment, and to conduct an educational intervention aimed at reducing noise in the intensive care unit. The methodology for this project included a pre-test, followed by an educational session, and completion of a post-test. The participants included registered nurse staff members in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) and the Critical Care Unit (CCU). Exclusion criteria included staff members who are not registered nurses. The project posed minimal risk. No identifying or biographical data was collected, and results included analysis of aggregate data. Descriptive statistics were used to assist with analysis. Results were disseminated to the staff of the ICU and CCU, posted on a bulletin board in the critical care area, presented as a poster presentation at the Spring RIC MSN Symposium, and available as a manuscript on the RIC Digital Commons.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document