Abstract MP53: Intensive Blood Pressure Reduction and Secondary Stroke Risk: A Posthoc Analysis of the Sps3 Trial

Stroke ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 52 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam H de Havenon ◽  
Maarten G Lansberg ◽  
Guido J Falcone ◽  
Rommell Noche ◽  
Shadi Yaghi ◽  
...  

Introduction: The SPRINT trial demonstrated cardiovascular benefit for a target systolic blood pressure (SBP) <120 mm Hg, but the effect on primary stroke was neutral. The Secondary Prevention of Small Subcortical Strokes (SPS3) trial did not reduce secondary stroke with a target SBP <130 mm Hg. No trial has investigated the effect of the more intensive SPRINT target of <120 mm Hg on secondary stroke risk. Methods: We performed a secondary analysis of SPS3 and included patients with at least 10 SBP readings. The primary predictor is mean SBP from day 30 (to avoid confounding from the initial study intervention) to 2 years. The primary outcome is recurrent ischemic stroke from day 30 to 2 years. We fit Cox models to our outcomes to derive hazard ratios for recurrent stroke events. Results: We included 2,859 patients, of which 121 (4.2%) had ischemic stroke during follow-up. There were 321 patients with SBP <120 (mean=115.5 mm Hg) and 2,538 with SBP ≥120 (mean=134.6 mm Hg), with a respective recurrent stroke rate of 1.9% versus 4.5% (p=0.026). In the Cox model, the hazard ratio for stroke with mean SBP <120 mm Hg was 0.40 (95% CI, 0.18-0.92) (Figure 1) and after adjustment for potential confounders (age, sex, race, education, smoking, prior stroke, prior myocardial infarction) the hazard ratio was 0.39 (95% CI, 0.16-0.96). Conclusion: In patients with lacunar stroke, achieving the SPRINT intensive blood pressure goal of <120 mm Hg was associated with a lower risk of recurrent stroke. While the current study is underpowered and has bias, these preliminary results suggest that the SPRINT definition of intensive blood pressure reduction could be beneficial for secondary stroke prevention.

Stroke ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 45 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Octavio M Pontes-Neto ◽  
Sergi Martinez-Ramirez ◽  
Anand Viswanathan ◽  
Timothy C Tan ◽  
Maria C Nunes ◽  
...  

Background: While acute hypertensive response (AHR) predicts worse outcome in intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), the INTERACT-2 trial recently failed to definitively demonstrate a major benefit of intensive blood pressure reduction on these patients. A possible explanation is that the detrimental effect of AHR on outcome may differ among ICH patients with and without previous chronic hypertension. Objective: to explore whether the prognosis of patients with AHR during the acute phase of ICH differs according to the presence or absence of left ventricle hypertrophy (LVH), which is a marker of chronic hypertensive organ damage. Method: we performed a retrospective analysis of a prospective cohort of patients with primary ICH presenting to an academic hospital between January/2000 and December/2012 with age > 18 years, who had a transthoracic echocardiogram available. LVH was defined according to Penn convention. AHR was defined as systolic blood pressure > 180 mmHg on admission. Mantel-Haenszel test was initially used to assess if LVH status influenced the effect of AHR on mortality. For subsequent analyses, ICH patients were divided in 3 groups: without AHR (reference); AHR without LVH; AHR with LVH. A multivariate logistic regression model was then used to identify independent predictors of mortality at 30-days. Results: 430 patients met inclusion criteria. AHR was present in 196 (46.6%), LVH was present in 233 (54.2%); 30-day mortality was 15.6%. On Mantel-Haenszel test, we found a trend (p=0.09) suggesting that absence of LVH increased AHR effect on mortality (OR:1.64; 95% CI: 0.95-2.8; p=0.07). On multivariate analysis, patients with AHR without LVH had significantly higher mortality (OR: 2.65; 95%CI: 1.15 to 6.1; p=0.022) when compared to patients without AHR, after adjusting for baseline characteristics. There was only a trend towards increased mortality in the group of patients with AHR and LVH (OR:2.22; 95% CI: 0.99-5.0; p=0.053). Conclusions: Patients without chronic hypertension appear to be more susceptible to the detrimental effects of AHR during the acute phase of ICH. Stratification of patients with ICH may help to identify those that will have greater benefit with intensive blood pressure reduction in the acute phase of ICH.


2018 ◽  
Vol 75 (7) ◽  
pp. 850 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashkan Shoamanesh ◽  
Andrea Morotti ◽  
Javier M. Romero ◽  
Jamary Oliveira-Filho ◽  
Frieder Schlunk ◽  
...  

Stroke ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 50 (8) ◽  
pp. 2016-2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Audrey C. Leasure ◽  
Adnan I. Qureshi ◽  
Santosh B. Murthy ◽  
Hooman Kamel ◽  
Joshua N. Goldstein ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (12) ◽  
pp. 1032-1041 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bharathi Upadhya ◽  
Laura C. Lovato ◽  
Michael Rocco ◽  
Cora E. Lewis ◽  
Suzanne Oparil ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document