Worldview ◽  
1978 ◽  
Vol 21 (7-8) ◽  
pp. 19-20
Author(s):  
Tran Thi Dam-Phuong

AbstractIn May, a brief communication from a source close to my family in Saigon informed me that they have just learned that my father, Tran Van Tuyen, whom they had not seen since he was sent to “reeducation” detention in June, 1975, died in confinement “in the North” on October 28, 1976.This sad message from Vietnam coincides with news just released by Hanoi's embassy in Paris to Amnesty International and the International Fellowship of Reconciliation, stating that my father died of a “cerebral hemorrhage.” Curiously, when Pham Van Dong, prime minister of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam, visited Paris in the spring of 1977, he told people making human rights inquiries about my father that he was still alive; and earlier this year Hanoi's propaganda machine released a barrage of attacks against my father.


Author(s):  
Michael Ruse

In 1914, Europe went to war, because of German expansionism, but without a central moral purpose as in 1939. Christian leaders had to scramble to find justification, which they soon located in our sinful nature, and most particularly the sinful nature of the opponents. In major respects, therefore, the First World War was a religious war, battling against the infidel. Anglican leaders, like the Bishop of London, Arthur F. Winnington Ingram, urged the necessity of killing Germans; and Lutheran leaders on the other side, like Adolf von Harnack, were no less bloodthirsty. There was an often-despised pacifist minority. In England, this included the philosopher Bertrand Russell, who was very much not a Christian, and members of the “Fellowship of Reconciliation,” who very much were Christians. In America, the Episcopalian bishop of Utah, Paul Jones, got the sack because of his pacifism, and the Catholic Ben Salmon was sent to jail and refused communion by his church.


2006 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
pp. 229-231 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanju George ◽  
Bill Calthorpe ◽  
Sudhir Khandelwal

The NHS International Fellowship Scheme for consultants offers overseas consultants, in specialties including psychiatry, an opportunity to work in the UK (Goldberg, 2003). This was launched by the Department of Health in 2002 and so far over 100 consultant psychiatrists have been recruited. However, there are several aspects of the project that are unclear. How long will this recruitment continue? Are there any arrangements in place to encourage overseas consultants to return to their home country at the end of their fellowship? Are they eligible to train senior house officers (SHOs) and specialist registrars (SpRs)? Will the recruitment under the scheme have an impact on job opportunities for SpRs currently training in the UK? Why is membership of the Royal College of Psychiatrists being granted to the newly recruited consultants without an examination? These and many more concerns have arisen in the wake of this scheme. In this article, we evaluate the scheme, discuss its implications and suggest possible ways forward.


Author(s):  
Tomasa Bañez Tello

En la primavera del 2005 tuve la oportunidad de participar en el programa internacional de intercambio profesional y cultural de la organización internacional CIF (Council of International Fellowship) en Turquía, visitando servicios sociales y conviviendo con familias turcas. Lo positivo de mi experiencia me ha animado a escribir este artículo para acercar a los lectores a la situación de los servicios sociales y del trabajo social en Turquía y para animarles a participar en este tipo de programas de intercambio, ya que son un excelente medio para compartir experiencias e intercambiar ideas y opiniones sobre la realidad social y cultural de los diversos países, así como sobre la política social, los servicios sociales y la profesión de trabajo social.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document