The 1992 Paris Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment of the North-East Atlantic: A Critical Analysis

1993 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-76 ◽  
Author(s):  
André Nollkaemper ◽  
Ellen Hey ◽  
Ton IJIstra
1993 ◽  
Vol 27 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 469-480 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. MacGarvin ◽  
P. A. Johnston

Present environmental policy in the countries around the North East Atlantic is in a state of transition; in part made up of old attitudes that assumed the environment to be largely capable of absorbing contamination, in part a new precaution that recognises that we cannot fully predict the result of such actions. Precaution will prevail, and be implemented by a form of pollution prevention, known as clean production, that emphasises the need to reduce and eliminate pollution at all stages of the manufacturing cycle. There are three reasons why change is inevitable. First, toxicological problems, along with serious ecological uncertainties, mean that we will be unable to predict ‘safe' levels of marine contamination for the foreseeable future. Second, demonstration projects make it clear that clean production is now feasible and economically attractive, even in ‘problem' industries. Third, the targets now being set for the reduction and elimination of potentially problematic substances – for instance by the 1990 North Sea Conference and the 1992 Paris Convention Ministerial meeting – have developed to the point where clean production provides the only feasible means of implementation. This change has significant implications for the water treatment industry.


2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 141
Author(s):  
Ngozi Ole ◽  
Hemen Philip Faga

The advent of deep-water oil exploration has increased concern for the impact of oil activities on marine environment, especially regarding disused or decommissioned facilities offshore. Before the Brent Spar incident, which galvanised international efforts to protect the environment, international and regional legal instruments on decommissioning of offshore oil installations was weak and ineffective in protecting the environment from the effect of disused facilities. This paper examined the efforts made by international and regional actors to remedy the lapses of the pre-Brent Spar legal instruments on decommissioning of offshore oil facilities, especially regarding the new provisions on environmental protection. The paper concluded that the supplementary legal instruments made post-Brent Spar have not radically transformed the legal regime on decommissioning of offshore oil facilities because contracting states still reserve the discretion to permit abandonment of disused facilities.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document