scholarly journals Natural Disasters in Medieval Greek Apocalypses

Scrinium ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-14
Author(s):  
András Kraft

Abstract Natural calamities form a standard theme in Byzantine apocalypses. This paper discusses their function and meaning by surveying more than a dozen medieval Greek apocalyptic narratives from the sixth to the fifteenth century. It is shown that natural disasters were understood as ambiguous epiphenomena, whose ultimate meaning revolved around human agency and intentionality. Furthermore, it is argued that Byzantine apocalypses offered an intellectual strategy for coping with natural calamities by placing them into an eschatological context. This eschatologization restored epistemological control of the – seemingly uncontrollable – phenomena. Finally, it is suggested that the understanding of natural disasters as anthropogenic events is not only characteristic of medieval Greek apocalypticism but also of modern-day environmental alarmism. The paper closes with a preliminary comparison of these two hermeneutic paradigms.

2020 ◽  
pp. 120-141
Author(s):  
Noelle Molé Liston

This chapter reviews the L'Aquila trial in a larger, socioecological context in which natural disaster has been reimagined as radically altered by human action. It talks about the Anthropocene, which confirms how the paradigmatic shift in understanding global ecology shapes how human agency and accountability are viewed in a single disaster. It also explains how society has reconceptualized natural disasters as resulting from human action, not natural force. The chapter evaluates the L'Aquila trial to reveal a newly emerging set of geological cosmologies and looks at millennial conspiracies about man-made natural disasters in Italy, which include giant warming machines that cause earthquakes and “chemtrails.” It argues that the growing rumors and conspiracy theories about deliberate and intentional disaster may offer a savvy critique of human complicity in natural disaster.


2020 ◽  
pp. 251-256
Author(s):  
David Kilcullen

The epilogue traces what happened to James Woolsey after 1993, explores issues of resilience and sustainability in the Western approach to war, and emphasizes the need to look beyond military victory to a better peace, which after all is the ultimate object of war. The epilogue looks at the key issues (including climate, energy, vulnerability to cyber and electronic attack, and political stability) that have become Woolsey’s primary focus since leaving government. It examines the issue of societal resilience, including against natural disasters and events beyond human agency, and emphasizes the need for societies—not just military strategists and planners—to adapt and respond to the changing environment.


2019 ◽  
Vol 42 (3) ◽  
pp. 45-72
Author(s):  
Jesse D. Mann

This article offers a preliminary comparison of the thoughts of Alfonso de Madrigal and Juan de Segovia, two important fifteenth-century Spanish academics and authors whom scholars have seen as ideological allies. It identifies several areas of interest common to both writers, and then focuses on their conciliarist views. It argues that while Madrigal and Segovia both asserted several conciliar “common places,” often in similar terms, their ecclesiological positions differed in significant ways. Madrigal’s “theoretical” conciliarism is contrasted with Segovia’s “engaged” conciliarism in order to illuminate the notable differences in their respective careers and influence. The article concludes with a call for closer comparative study of these two wide-ranging thinkers.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document