scholarly journals Behaviour of Square Footing Due to the Effect of Adjacent Excavation in Sand

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 62
Author(s):  
Karthigeyan Shanmugam ◽  
Vishalatchi Ramasamy ◽  
Abhirami Bindu
Keyword(s):  
Square Footing

Performance of square footing with structural skirt resting on sand

2008 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 271-277 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammed Yousuf Al-Aghbari ◽  
R. K. Dutta
Keyword(s):  
Square Footing

scholarly journals Bearing capacity of isolated square footing resting on contaminated sandy soil with crude oil

2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 281-288
Author(s):  
Ahmed Ibrahim Fadhil Al-Adly ◽  
Amjad Ibrahim Fadhil ◽  
Mohammed Yousif Fattah
Keyword(s):  
Crude Oil ◽  
Bearing Capacity ◽  
Sandy Soil ◽  
Square Footing

Bearing capacity improvement of square footing by micropiles

2011 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 113-118 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arup Bhattacharjee ◽  
Satyendra Mittal ◽  
A. Krishna
Keyword(s):  
Bearing Capacity ◽  
Square Footing ◽  
Capacity Improvement

Bearing capacity of square footing on geocell reinforced fly ash beds

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (9) ◽  
pp. 10570-10580
Author(s):  
N.K. Kumawat ◽  
S.K. Tiwari
Keyword(s):  
Fly Ash ◽  
Bearing Capacity ◽  
Square Footing

scholarly journals In Situ Testing of Square Footing Resting on Geobelt-Reinforced Gravel Thin Cushion on Soft Silt

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei Zhang ◽  
David Du ◽  
Xiaohong Bai
Keyword(s):  
Pressure Distribution ◽  
Width Ratio ◽  
Test Results ◽  
In Situ Testing ◽  
Square Footing ◽  
Stress Diffusion ◽  
Loading Tests ◽  
Vertical Spacing ◽  
Saddle Shape

A series of in situ static loading tests of square footing were carried out on the geobelt-reinforced gravel cushion on soft silt. The reinforced gravel cushion was thin with the depth-to-width ratio of 0.2. A parameters study was conducted by considering the number of geobelt layers, the depth of the first geobelt layer beneath the footing, the vertical spacing between two geobelt layers, the linear density of reinforcement, and the material type of geobelt. The pressure distribution on bottom of the cushion was measured. The test results showed that the bearing capacity of reinforced gravel cushion was significantly larger than that of unreinforced gravel cushion, and the stress diffusion effect of reinforced gravel cushion was also more pronounced than that of the unreinforced cushion. The pressure distribution on bottom of reinforced gravel cushion was in a saddle shape. According to calculation and analysis, the stress diffusion angles of reinforced cushions were all larger than 20°.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document