scholarly journals Evaluation of a Monofile, Ultra-Long Absorbable Suture with High Elasticity for Abdominal Wall Closure Under Daily Clinical Routine MULTIMAC a Prospective Observational Study

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Petra Baumann
Keyword(s):  
Observational Study ◽  
Abdominal Wall ◽  
Prospective Observational Study ◽  
Absorbable Suture ◽  
Abdominal Wall Closure ◽  
Clinical Routine ◽  
High Elasticity

Differences of alternative methods of measuring abdominal wall hernia defect size: a prospective observational study

2017 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 1228-1233 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deepa V. Cherla ◽  
Debbie F. Lew ◽  
Richard J. Escamilla ◽  
Julie L. Holihan ◽  
Arun S. Cherla ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Observational Study ◽  
Abdominal Wall ◽  
Prospective Observational Study ◽  
Abdominal Wall Hernia ◽  
Defect Size ◽  
Alternative Methods ◽  
Hernia Defect

scholarly journals Technique of Midline Abdominal Incision Closure Among Surgical Trainees

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 72-75
Author(s):  
Alex Muturi ◽  
Kotecha Vihar ◽  
Pulei Ann ◽  
Maseghe Philip
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Wall ◽  
Anterior Abdominal Wall ◽  
Tertiary Hospital ◽  
Fascial Closure ◽  
Wound Complications ◽  
Absorbable Suture ◽  
Abdominal Wall Closure ◽  
Abdominal Incision ◽  
Abdominal Closure ◽  
Surgical Trainees

Background: Technique of anterior abdominal wall closure (AAWC) determines wound-related surgical complications. Residents in obstetrics and gynecology and surgery departments perform most midline abdominal wall closure; data is lacking on how it is being done. This study identifies abdominal wall closure techniques used. Methods: A descriptive study was carried out from October 2015 to May 2016. Results: 71 (35 surgical, 36 ObGyn) residents completed a self-administered questionnaire. Knowledge of midline abdominal closure was acquired from medical officers (58.6%) or consultants before residency (28.6%). Absorbable suture was preferred for clean wounds by 75% of residents; 70% used size 1 suture for fascial closure. Most residents (95.7%) closed fascia in clean wound by continuous suturing. Interrupted suturing was preferred in contaminated and dirty wounds. Half of the residents in both groups would close skin in contaminated wounds, while 16% of surgery and 9.4% ObGyn will close skin in dirty wounds. Conclusion: Inconsistencies exist in anterior abdominal wall closure between groups of residents despite presence of clear guidelines. It is important to harmonize training on AAWC at the tertiary hospital. Keywords: Abdominal closure, Midline incision, Wound complications

Subcutaneous Videosurgery for Abdominal Wall Defects: A Prospective Observational Study

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 523-530 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leandro Cardoso Barchi ◽  
Maurice Youssef Franciss ◽  
Bruno Zilberstein
Keyword(s):  
Observational Study ◽  
Abdominal Wall ◽  
Prospective Observational Study ◽  
Abdominal Wall Defects

scholarly journals Searching for the safest abdominal closure technique after emergency laparotomy for Hinchey III and IV peritonitis

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (8) ◽  
pp. 2534
Author(s):  
Nicolo Tamini ◽  
Marco Cereda ◽  
Giulia Capelli ◽  
Alessandro Giani ◽  
Luca Gianotti
Keyword(s):  
Incisional Hernia ◽  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Abdominal Wall ◽  
Data Retrieval ◽  
Fascial Closure ◽  
Skin Closure ◽  
Absorbable Suture ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Abdominal Wall Closure ◽  
Midline Laparotomy

Background: The optimal strategy for abdominal wall closure has been an ongoing issue of debate and convincing evidence is still lacking. The INLINE systematic review and meta-analysis published on annals of surgery 2010 suggested that a running suture with a slowly absorbable suture material was the gold standard technique for abdominal wall closure after elective surgery, while there’s no general agreement in the emergency setting.Methods: Retrospective study regarding patients who underwent emergency surgery for a generalized peritonitis due to colonic perforation from 2002 to 2014 at San Gerardo hospital (Monza, Italy). Particularly study analyzed differences between continuous suture (Maxon loop, Covidien ©) and interrupted suture (Safil, B. Braun ©) for fascial closure and between metallic clips and second intention healing for incision management. After completion of data retrieval, 110 patients were included in the statistical analysis.Results: Incisional hernia rate was 15/101 (14.9%) and surgical site infection rate was 29/110 (26.4%). No significant statistical differences were found between incidence of incisional hernia and surgical site infection in the two groups, although there was a higher prevalence of incisional hernia in the running suture group (25% vs 11,7%). There was no difference between skin-stapler’s and second-intention’s wound closure groups in terms of surgical site infection and incisional hernia development.Conclusions: We consider reasonable to use an interrupted long time absorbable suture for fascial closure after emergency midline laparotomy for Hinchey III and IV peritonitis, at least in high-risk patients. Considering skin closure, suggestion is to perform a primary skin closure.

Prospective Observational Study of Sleep and PTSD Symptoms in Patients Undergoing PTSD Treatment

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ihori Kobayashi ◽  
Brian Hall ◽  
Courtney Hout ◽  
Vanessa Springston ◽  
Patrick Palmieri
Keyword(s):  
Observational Study ◽  
Prospective Observational Study ◽  
Ptsd Symptoms ◽  
Ptsd Treatment

The 1000Plus study protocol – a prospective observational study on the mismatch concept in a 3.0 T MRI

2009 ◽  
Vol 36 (S 02) ◽  
Author(s):  
B Hotter ◽  
S Pittl ◽  
M Ebinger ◽  
G Oepen ◽  
K Jegzentis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Observational Study ◽  
Study Protocol ◽  
Prospective Observational Study ◽  
3.0 T ◽  
3.0 T Mri
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document