OV07 LAPAROSCOPIC HIATAL HERNIA MESH-SUTURE REPAIR

Aim “A new original laparoscopic operative technique was used to suture paraesophageal hernia (PEH) with the strips of mesh. Material and Methods The Mercilen (MercilenTM) mesh suture was used to close large hiatal hernia. The strips of mesh, instead of normal thread, were applied to close the gap between diaphragm’s crura in 12 patients with hernia defect more than 5 cm. Mesh suture were tighten as a simple laparoscopic intracorporeal knot. The surgical technique and surgical outcomes are presented. Results 12 patients underwent a laparoscopic PEH suturing with Mercilen strips of mesh. We recorded no recurrence or dysphagia at 6 and 12 months follow-up. Conclusions Mesh-sutured repairs of diaphragm’s hernia support the concepts of force distribution and resistance to suture pull through. The new original technique avoids using the sheet of mesh and enables to reduce the amount of dangerous complications connected with mesh and its fixation. Mesh-sutured closures of hiatal hernias seem to be safe and effective in tension closure of large hiatal defects. Further investigations are needed to evaluate the results. Using the mesh suture technique for the closure of large PEH, we protect the cruras from being cutting through. Besides, the mesh stripes and its knots produce tissue scarring around the esophagus making the suture line stronger.

P139 LAPAROSCOPIC TRANSABDOMINAL PREPERITONEAL REPAIR FOR SMALL AND MEDIUM PRIMARY UMBILICAL AND MIDLINE HERNIAS

Aim Complications of open mesh repair for primary umbilical and midline hernias (PUMH) may lead to significant re-admissions and follow-up costs. Although laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair reduces infection rates, especially in overweight patients, it’s controversial in these hernias, mainly due to potential adhesions’ formation. Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal technique (lap-TAPP) may address these issues, as it combines advantages of both open and laparoscopic approaches. The aim of this study is to present the initial results of lap-TAPP for PUMH in regard to its feasibility and complication rates. Material and Methods We evaluated 25 consecutive cases of lap-TAPP repair for PUMH. Patients’s characteristics, intraoperative findings, and postoperative complications after 30-days follow-up were analyzed. Results 21 male and 4 female patients were included in analysis (mean BMI 29.8 kg/m2). Surgery time was 82 minutes (55-120). We found 20 umbilical and 11 epigastric linea alba hernias. Mesh size was 144cm2 (120-225); mean hernia defect width was 25mm (10-40). In 9 patients (36%) the peritoneal rents were created which were easily closed with sutures. All patients were discharged on 1 POD with no complications. After 30-days we found no recurrences or bulging, no pain complaints. We found one subcutaneous small hematoma with no need for intervention. Conclusions Laparoscopic TAPP for small and medium PUMH is a safe and feasible technique with low complication rate. However, this method is technically demanding and time consuming while performed with laparoscopic approach as it requires precise and subtle plane dissection, and non-ergonomic closure hernia defect.

O52 LAP-T MINI LAPAROSCOPIC TECHNIQUE FOR THE REPAIR OF RECURRENT UMBILICAL HERNIA ON PRIMARILY UNTREATED DIASTASIS

Aim “This retrospective analysis on 1000 cases of Diatasis Recti (DR) complicated by single/multiple, primary/recurrent hernias, all treated with the Laparoscopic Abdominoplasty Technique (LAP-T), aims at evaluating the possible correlation of higher recurrence rate and complications when DR is left untreated” Material and Methods “This review on 1000 patients, <65yrs, BMI<30, 3>IRD>12, based on CT Scan/MRI study, showed 235 (23,5%) of them to be recurrent umbilical/midline hernias engaged on untreated RMD, independently from the surgical technique used for primary repair. Re-operation with LAP-T technique, consisted in removal of recurrent hernia and dislocated mesh when present, closure by self-locking running sutures of the hernia defect and the DR. Repair is consolidated placing an intra-peritoneal mesh” Results “In all patients, recurrence was repaired, DR reconstructed and abdominal wall anatomy and physiological functionality successfully restored. No intra operative bleeding, seroma formation, chronic pain, nor mesh infection have been recorded. 98% follow up at 12 months, 91% at 24, no recurrences observed” Conclusions “Higher incidence of recurrent umbilical/midline hernias observed in this analysis, compared to average recurrence rate reported in literature, suggest that regardless primary repair technique, the repair of the sole hernia engaged on a DR is likely to lead to a recurrent hernia, further midline hernia defects formation and worsening of the DR. A significant correlation between the recurrency after primary umbilical/midline repair when a concomitant RMD is left untreated is likely to lead to a more invasive and complicated re-intervention, higher complication rate and discomfort for the patient”

A Rare Case of a Migrating Inguinal Hernia Mesh Presenting as Acute Appendicitis

Acute appendicitis is a very common event. Migration of hernia mesh is rare, especially intraluminal migrations. We aim to report a case of a migrated inguinal mesh presenting as an acute appendicitis. A 58-year-old male previously submitted to ONSTEP right inguinal hernia repair with a PolySoft™ hernia patch eight years before, was admitted in the emergency department with acute appendicitis, and submitted to laparoscopic appendectomy. Intraoperatively, the “recoil ring” from the inguinal hernia patch was extended from the anterior abdominal wall to the appendix, perforating it and progressing intraluminally. Appendectomy was performed, as well as removal of the mesh by an anterior approach. Hernia mesh migration to an intraluminally position is extremely rare with only a few cases described in literature. Pathogenesis of migration is still poorly understood. Clinicians should consider hernia mesh migration in their differential diagnosis for causes of acute appendicitis, in the right clinical setting, when a previous hernia defect correction is present. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first reported case of inguinal hernia mesh migration to the appendix, presenting as acute appendicitis.

Reducing operative morbidity among female patients combining laparoscopic hysterectomy and laparoscopic ventral hernia mesh repair procedures: a single centre 14 years experiences

Background: During laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (LVHR) mesh is used and so this procedure is not combined with any other major surgery, due to the risk of mesh infection. We did laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH) with LVHR in our study group and found it to be safe procedure with excellent patient recovery and satisfaction rates. Aims and objectives of the study was to assess the short- and long-term clinical outcomes of doing LH and LVHR simultaneously. The primary objectives were to evaluate the intraoperative and post-operative complications, mesh infection rates, hernia recurrence rates and patient satisfaction rates for at least 4 years.Methods: This prospective study was conducted at Aarogya Hospital and test tube centre from 1st January 2007 to 31st December 2016 and follow up completed by 31st December 2020. Total 100 women were included, willing for LH and LVHR simultaneously irrespective of the size of uterus and hernia defect size up to 7cms.Results: Maximum number of patients 65% were in the age group of 45-55 years. 70% patients had previous surgeries commonest being LSCS in 46% cases. Hernia defect size was between 3-5 cm in length and width in 70% cases, requiring dual mesh fixation in 68% cases of size 15x15cms. Our recurrence rate for hernia was nil, 98% cases were highly satisfied with the surgical outcomes by the end of 4 years follow-up.Conclusions: We emphasize that LH can be easily done with LVHR in combination reducing operative morbidity.

Subcutaneous Onlay Laparoscopic Approach (SCOLA) for Umbilical Hernia with Diastasis of Rectus Abdominis Muscle: A Case Report

Diastasis of the rectus abdominis muscles (DRAM) is a common pathology, usually associated with midline abdominal wall hernias. The midline ventral hernias with diastasis have a significantly high recurrence rate, so repairing the hernia defect and the diastasis should be considered. Claus et al. previously described the subcutaneous onlay laparoscopic approach (SCOLA). We report a case of diastasis recti associated with umbilical hernia repaired with SCOLA technique. A 46-year-old male patient presented with a disturbing bulge in the upper midline and painful umbilical swelling. The CT scan followed by physical examination revealed 28 mm. umbilical hernia and 35 mm. diastasis recti. We aimed to introduce the SCOLA technique using a narrated video clip and showed all the critical steps and anatomical landmarks in the video. The postoperative period was uneventful, and the patient was discharged on the second postoperative day. The SCOLA technique is a feasible and reproducible alternative for the repair of midline hernias associated with DRAM.

Back сruroraphy and hernioplasty for diaphragm hernias of various sizes

The aim of the research. The work considers the results of posterior cruraraphy along with hernioplasty, using polypropylene and biocarbon implant in surgical treatment of diaphragmatic hernias of various sizes. Material and methods. Totally 716 patients were divided into 3 study groups, based on the size of esophageal hernia defect: group I (314 people) – with small and medium size of hiatal hernias, who underwent posterior cruraphy; group II (323 patients) – with large hernias: subgroup 1 (92 patients) underwent posterior cruraphy, subgroup 2 (231 patients) – underwent hernioplasty. Subgroup 2 was divided into: subgroup A (89 people) – plastic surgery with polypropylene implant and subgroup B (142 people) – plastic surgery with biocarbon implant. Group III (79 patients) – patients with giant hiatal hernias: subgroup A (29 people) – plastic surgery with polypropylene implant and subgroup B (50 patients) – biocarbon construction. Results. While comparing group Ӏ with group II, subgroup 1 signifi cant diff erences were found in the degrees and types of hernias. Th e age of patients was not statistically important. While comparing subgroup 1 with subgroup 2 of group II, statistically insignifi cant diff erences were revealed in degrees and types of hernias. Th e age of patients was also statistically insignifi cant. While comparing subgroup A with subgroup B of group II, insignifi cant diff erences were revealed in degrees and types of hernias. While comparing subgroup 2, group II with group III, the diff erence turned out to be signifi cant in types and degrees of hernias. While comparing subgroup A with subgroup B, group III, statistically insignifi cant diff erences were revealed in the degrees and types of hiatal hernias. Conclusion. Posterior cruraphy in small and medium diaphragmatic hernias differed in types, degrees and size of hernia defect in comparison to the one in large hernias. Posterior cruraphy with plasty for large hernias did not diff er signifi cantly according to any of the criteria. Plastic surgery by polypropylene implant with biocarbon in case of large hernias did not diff er signifi cantly by any criteria. Plastic surgery for large hernias compared to giant ones, diff ered only in the degree and types, as well as in hernia defect size. Plastic surgery by polypropylene implant with biocarbon in giant hernias did not differ in any criteria, except for gender distribution, which was not signifi cant, that made it possible to compare treatment results in these subgroups more correctly.