Platelets: Pivotal Player in Primary Sensitization to Allergen?

2018 ◽  
Vol 59 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akio Matsuda
2003 ◽  
Vol 33 (10) ◽  
pp. 1439-1442 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. M. Vermeulen ◽  
G. C. M. Groenewoud ◽  
N. W. De Jong ◽  
H. De Groot ◽  
R. Gerth van Wijk ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 63 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 227-230
Author(s):  
Slobodanka Petrovic ◽  
Jelena Tomic ◽  
Radmila Ljustina-Pribic

Introduction The natural course of asthma is unpredictable and appears to be unaffected by any therapeutic strategy. Under such circumstances, the attention must be focused on the opportunities for prevention of a disease which is chronic, life long and incurable, even thought it can be very effectively controlled. During the past decades, a lot of a studies have been performed and started, in which relatively large numbers of children were included and followed prospectively to determine the incidence of risk factors for asthma in childhood. All these studies have contributed significant new information. The levels of prevention must be considered in all patients. There are two main separate components to the strategy. Primary prophylaxis Primary prophylaxis (time course of allergic sensitization, timing of exposure to allergens, influence of tobacco smoke, maternal health and allergen exposure) is introduced before there is any evidence of sensitization to factors which might have caused the disease. There is increasing evidence that allergic sensitization is a very common precursor to the development of asthma. Secondary prophylaxis Secondary prophylaxis (allergen avoidance, hygiene hypothesis) is important after primary sensitization to allergen has occurred, but before there is any evidence of asthma. Conclusion In this article the authors reviewed all results of studies about primary and secondary prophylaxis of asthma and its influence on the course of disease.


2000 ◽  
Vol 162 (supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S91-S94 ◽  
Author(s):  
PATRICK G. HOLT ◽  
CLAUDIA MACAUBAS ◽  
SUSAN L. PRESCOTT ◽  
PETER D. SLY

1998 ◽  
Vol 187 (7) ◽  
pp. 1133-1138 ◽  
Author(s):  
Craig Hammerberg ◽  
Santosh K. Katiyar ◽  
Michael C. Carroll ◽  
Kevin D. Cooper

Complement component 3 (C3), a critical regulator of innate immunity, may also play a role in the regulation of cognate immunity, such as contact sensitivity responses. Because ultraviolet (UV) radiation also activates C3 in the skin, we determined whether the immunosuppressed state that results when a contact sensitizer is applied through UVB-exposed skin requires the presence and activation of C3. This question was addressed through the use of C3-deficient mice, blockade of C3 cleavage to C3b, and accelerated degradation of iC3b by soluble complement receptor 1 (sCR1). Both C3-modulated systems totally reversed the failure to induce a contact sensitivity response to dinitrofluorobenzene (DNFB) upon primary sensitization at the UV-exposed site, as well as immunologic tolerance to a second DNFB immunization through normal skin. Treatment with sCR1 reduced the infiltration of CD11b+ leukocytes into the epidermis and dermis of UV-irradiated skin but did not reverse the UV-induced depletion of epidermal class II MHC+CD11blo Langerhans cells. These data, taken together with previous results showing abrogation of locally induced UV immunosuppression by in vivo anti-CD11b treatment, suggest a novel mechanism by which ligation of the leukocyte β2 integrin, CD11b, by iC3b molecules formed from C3 activation in UV-exposed skin, modifies cutaneous CD11b+ cells such that skin antigen-presenting cells are unable to sensitize in a primary immune response, but actively induce antigenic tolerance.


2001 ◽  
Vol 45 (4) ◽  
pp. 248-248 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. L. Simpson-Dent ◽  
S. H. Hunt ◽  
S. C. Davison ◽  
S. H. Wakelin

1962 ◽  
Vol 116 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harold F. Dvorak ◽  
Byron H. Waksman

Normal Dutch rabbit lymph node and spleen minces, lymph node cell suspensions, and residues from lymph node cell suspensions were cultured in Millipore chambers with slices of autologous or homologous (New Zealand) ear skin. for varying time intervals. Lymphoid cells exposed to New Zealand ear skin for more than 4 days were found capable of producing typical "transfer reactions" in the specific New Zealand ear skin donor, similar in every way to reactions produced by cells from lymph nodes sensitized in the intact Dutch animal. Heat-killed cells and cells exposed to New Zealand ear skin for less than 4 days (in chambers or in the intact animal) or to Dutch ear skin for any period of time were incapable of eliciting such reactions. It is concluded that normal lymphoid tissues undergo primary sensitization when exposed to homografts in Millipore chambers for suitable periods of time.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document