scholarly journals Quantum and Classical Characterization of Single/Few Photon Detectors

2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 200-212 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. G. Mingolla ◽  
F. Piacentini ◽  
A. Avella ◽  
M. Gramegna ◽  
L. Lolli ◽  
...  
2003 ◽  
Vol 02 (01) ◽  
pp. 21-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. FONTANA ◽  
P. JARA ◽  
E. SANTOS

Starting from the notion of semistar operation, introduced in 1994 by Okabe and Matsuda [49], which generalizes the classical concept of star operation (cf. Gilmer's book [27]) and, hence, the related classical theory of ideal systems based on the works by W. Krull, E. Noether, H. Prüfer, P. Lorenzen and P. Jaffard (cf. Halter–Koch's book [32]), in this paper we outline a general approach to the theory of Prüfer ⋆-multiplication domains (or P⋆MDs), where ⋆ is a semistar operation. This approach leads to relax the classical restriction on the base domain, which is not necessarily integrally closed in the semistar case, and to determine a semistar invariant character for this important class of multiplicative domains (cf. also J. M. García, P. Jara and E. Santos [25]). We give a characterization theorem of these domains in terms of Kronecker function rings and Nagata rings associated naturally to the given semistar operation, generalizing previous results by J. Arnold and J. Brewer ]10] and B. G. Kang [39]. We prove a characterization of a P⋆MD, when ⋆ is a semistar operation, in terms of polynomials (by using the classical characterization of Prüfer domains, in terms of polynomials given by R. Gilmer and J. Hoffman [28], as a model), extending a result proved in the star case by E. Houston, S. J. Malik and J. Mott [36]. We also deal with the preservation of the P⋆MD property by ascent and descent in case of field extensions. In this context, we generalize to the P⋆MD case some classical results concerning Prüfer domains and PvMDs. In particular, we reobtain as a particular case a result due to H. Prüfer [51] and W. Krull [41] (cf. also F. Lucius [43] and F. Halter-Koch [34]). Finally, we develop several examples and applications when ⋆ is a (semi)star given explicitly (e.g. we consider the case of the standardv-, t-, b-, w-operations or the case of semistar operations associated to appropriate families of overrings).


2011 ◽  
Vol 83 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Keil ◽  
Felix Dreisow ◽  
Matthias Heinrich ◽  
Andreas Tünnermann ◽  
Stefan Nolte ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 56 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 358-363 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin J. Stevens ◽  
Robert H. Hadfield ◽  
Thomas Gerrits ◽  
Tracy S. Clement ◽  
Richard P. Mirin ◽  
...  

CLEO: 2013 ◽  
2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard L. Sandberg ◽  
Nina R. Weisse-Bernstein ◽  
Mark P. Croce ◽  
Todd L. Williamson ◽  
Mark A. Hoffbauer ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Rolando Magnanini ◽  
Michele Marini

Let K ⊂ ℝN be any convex body containing the origin. A measurable set G ⊂ ℝN with finite and positive Lebesgue measure is said to be K-dense if, for any fixed r > 0, the measure of G ⋂ (x + rK) is constant when x varies on the boundary of G (here, x + rK denotes a translation of a dilation of K). In a previous work, we proved for the case N = 2 that if G is K-dense, then both G and K must be homothetic to the same ellipse. Here, we completely characterize K-dense sets in ℝN: if G is K-dense, then both G and K must be homothetic to the same ellipsoid. Our proof, which builds upon results obtained in our previous work, relies on an asymptotic formula for the measure of G ⋂ (x + rK) for large values of the parameter r and a classical characterization of ellipsoids due to Petty.


2007 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 1322 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chuang Liang ◽  
Kim F. Lee ◽  
Milja Medic ◽  
Prem Kumar ◽  
Robert H. Hadfield ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document