scholarly journals Biases and Sensitivities in the Poggendorff Effect when Driven by Subjective Contours

2008 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 474 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc S. Tibber ◽  
Dean R. Melmoth ◽  
Michael J. Morgan
Keyword(s):  

1993 ◽  
Vol 76 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1283-1286 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giovanni Bruno Vicario ◽  
Elena Zambianchi

In 1988 Greene noted, if a straight pair of obliques are drawn outside of two orthogonal lines, the segments appear to be angled slightly one relative to the other. This illusion, designated as “corner Poggendorff,” is different from the Poggendorff effect (the two obliques seem to lie on a parallel path). The results of the present experiments ( N = 76 students) suggest that the general conditions for the corner Poggendorff are similar to those for the Judd illusion.



Perception ◽  
1989 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 143-154 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ernest Greene ◽  
George Pavlov

The Poggendorff effect is seen as misalignment of two obliques, or misprojection of one, when the obliques are placed outside a set of parallel lines. To understand better the mechanisms behind this effect, the orientation of the lines which are normally parallel was systematically manipulated. The results indicate that projection bias is affected by the orientation of either line, is at a minimum where the line is orthogonal to the oblique, and is maximal at small angles. This is in line with classic theories which attribute the illusion to misperception of angular size. However, such explanations presuppose that in order to be effective the induction line must be proximal to the oblique so that an angle can be formed. Results are reported which show that the angle formed by the oblique and a line placed at a distance from the oblique, serving as the target of the projection, follows an angular rule of effectiveness similar to what is seen when the line is placed directly in contact with the oblique. The underlying process is described as ‘angular induction’.



1987 ◽  
Vol 42 (6) ◽  
pp. 561-568 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. H. Day ◽  
W. J. Jolly ◽  
F. M. Duffy
Keyword(s):  


1973 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 535-541 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. H. Day

The apparent misalignment of two oblique collinear lines was investigated in two experiments. In the first the effect with the lines at 45° to the median plane was compared with that for the same two lines separated by the conventional parallels of the Poggendorff figure. The illusion with the two lines was consistent and significant but about one-third the magnitude of that with the parallels. The two illusions were significantly correlated. In the second experiment the angle of the two oblique, collinear lines was varied in 15° steps. The misalignment illusion was maximal at 45° and smaller but significant at 60 and 75°. There was no significant effect at 15 and 30°.



1989 ◽  
Vol 45 (6) ◽  
pp. 494-500 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. T. Trueman ◽  
A. E. Wilson
Keyword(s):  




Perception ◽  
1987 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 385-388 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ernest Greene

It is well known that a set of parallel lines can cause misperception of the projected path of an oblique. Most studies of this effect have emphasized either the proximal or the distal stimulus components—the line with which the oblique makes contact, or the line that serves as the target of the projection. An experiment is reported in which the relative contribution of the contact and target lines was examined. The results indicate that rotation of either line can determine the magnitude of the projection error.





1981 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Terunori Mori
Keyword(s):  


1986 ◽  
Vol 39 (6) ◽  
pp. 447-448 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suzanne Greist-Bousquet ◽  
H. R. Schiffman
Keyword(s):  


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document