scholarly journals Properties of Visual Field Defects Around the Monocular Preferred Retinal Locus in Age-Related Macular Degeneration

2017 ◽  
Vol 58 (5) ◽  
pp. 2652 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan Denniss ◽  
Helen C. Baggaley ◽  
Graham M. Brown ◽  
Gary S. Rubin ◽  
Andrew T. Astle
Author(s):  
Ron A. Adelman ◽  
Patricia Pahk

Pathologic processes involving the retina or choroid can present with a wide variety of visual field defects. Usually visual field defects of retinal diseases directly correlate with the fundus findings. Visual field changes are often the result of damage to the retina or scarring but, in conjunction with other clinical findings, they may help narrow the differential diagnosis. Most of the macular lesions result in visual field defects that do not respect the vertical or horizontal midline. Occasionally inflammatory disorders result in visual field defects that do not directly correlate with the retinal findings. For example, patients with multiple evanescent white dot syndrome (MEWDS) may have an enlarged blind spot. Macular disorders can cause central or paracentral scotomas depending on the location of the lesion. Causes of macular pathology include drusen, atrophy from dry age-related macular degeneration (AMD), retinal hemorrhage, choroidal neovascular membrane, macular edema, macular hole, macular scar, pathologic myopia, and macular dystrophies of the retina or choroid. Central serous chorioretinopathy (CSCR) can show a relative defect that is anatomically correlated with the area of subretinal or sub RPE (retinal pigment epithelium) fluid accumulation. Residual pigmentary changes in inactive CSCR can also cause a relative depression in the corresponding visual field. Pathologic myopia can present with a variety of visual field defects depending on the retinal findings, such as posterior staphyloma or choroidal neovascular membrane. AMD may show nonspecific changes in the central or paracentral visual field that correlate with the structural damage to the retina and choroid. Geographic atrophy in dry AMD can cause a dense scotoma correlated with the pattern of the atrophy. Choroidal neovascular membranes can cause a depression in the correlating visual field due to edema or hemorrhage. Disciform scars in endstage AMD can also cause a dense scotoma. Macular holes may cause a small central scotoma. Pattern dystrophies are a family of disorders with a common pathology at the level of the RPE. Butterfly dystrophy, an autosomal dominant disorder, and Sjögren reticular dystrophy, an autosomal recessive disorder, are two examples of pattern dystrophies.


1994 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 409-413 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J. Tolentino ◽  
Sumiko Miller ◽  
Alexander R. Gaudio ◽  
Michael A. Sandberg

2020 ◽  
Vol 258 (4) ◽  
pp. 805-813 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrzej Grzybowski ◽  
Piotr Kanclerz ◽  
Raimo Tuuminen

Abstract Purpose Multifocal intraocular lenses (MIOLs) are often discouraged in patients with or at risk of retinal disorders (including diabetic retinopathy, age-related macular degeneration, and epiretinal membranes), as MIOLs are believed to reduce contrast sensitivity (CS). Concerns with MIOLs have also been raised in individuals with visual field defects, fixation instability or eccentric preferred retinal locations. The aim of this study is to review the influence of MIOL on quality of vision in patients with retinal diseases. Methods We reviewed the PubMed and Web of Science databases to identify relevant studies using the following keywords: multifocal intraocular lens, cataract surgery, cataract extraction, lens exchange, diabetic retinopathy, age-related macular degeneration, and contrast sensitivity. Results Studies evaluating CS in MIOLs present conflicting results: MIOLs either did not influence CS or resulted in worse performance under low-illuminance conditions and higher spatial frequencies when compared to monofocal IOLs. Nevertheless, MIOLs preserved CS levels within the age-matched normal range. Two studies reported that patients with concurrent retinal diseases receiving a MIOL, both unilaterally and bilaterally, reported a significant improvement in visual-related outcomes. Individuals with a monofocal IOL in one eye and a MIOL in the fellow eye reported greater subjective satisfaction with the MIOL. Conclusion We were unable to find evidence suggesting that patients with retinal diseases should be advised against MIOLs. Nevertheless, more research is needed to address the aforementioned concerns and to optimize the use of MIOLs in eyes with retinal disease.


2001 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 309-312 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Sadowski ◽  
C. Kriegbaum ◽  
E. Apfelstedt-Sylla

Purpose Differential diagnosis of maculopathies can be difficult but is important if patients also suffer from other diseases such as breast cancer treated with antiestrogens. The main possible diagnoses, especially in the elderly, are age-related macular degeneration, tamoxifen and cancer-associated retinopathy (CAR). Methods We describe an 84-year-old patient with breast and colon cancer, who complained of a decrease in visual acuity after treatment with low-dose antiestrogens. She underwent a general ophthalmological investigation, perimetry and electroretinographic examination with multifocal (m-ERG) and flash-electroretinogram (flash-ERG). Results Visual acuity was reduced to 1/50 and 0.3. The ophthalmological examination was normal, except for extensive bilateral maculopathy with shining crystalline deposits, central and peripheral visual field defects, slightly affected scotopic and photopic potentials in the flash-ERG, and an abnormal m-ERG. Conclusions The findings are expected with age-related macular degeneration with crystalline drusen, but also with CAR. Even if the single and total dosage of antiestrogens given to the patient is sufficient to cause tamoxifen retinopathy, this diagnosis can be excluded because, in tamoxifen retinopathy unlike in the case presented here, the deposits are not distributed in all retinal layers.


2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 56-60
Author(s):  
M. M. Bikbov ◽  
O. I. Orenburkina ◽  
A. E. Babushkin

This review presents the characteristics and results of clinical studies of patients with age-related macular degeneration implanted with the developed for this purpose first macular IOL – intraocular macular telescope (IMT). This lens was designed specifically for patients with the most severe or terminal form of age-related macular degeneration and is designed for monocular implantation to provide central vision while maintaining peripheral vision of the paired eye, which is important for maintaining the balance and orientation of patients. This device allows patients to see both in dynamic and static situations in the near, intermediate and far ranges. The disadvantages of this lens are a decrease in the visual field and depth of focus (which excludes its bilateral implantation), the need for a large (10–12 mm) incision for implantation, which can cause an increase in corneal astigmatism and the risk of complications, in particular, the pupillary block with an increase in intraocular pressure. There are also difficulties in the study of the fundus after its implantation to assess the small changes in the macula or to identify possible postoperative complications after cataract surgery (macular oedema, etc.). Also after the implantation of this lens, there is need for special programs of visual rehabilitation. The patient’s commitment to the rehabilitation measures for the adaptation of the central visual field of the operated eye with the peripheral vision of the second eye is crucial for success of the IMT macular telescope implantation procedure.


2010 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 62-66 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noboru Shima ◽  
Samuel N. Markowitz ◽  
Sophia V. Reyes

PLoS ONE ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. e39944 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer H. Acton ◽  
Jonathan M. Gibson ◽  
Robert P. Cubbidge

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document