scholarly journals Talking about what we see, again: further evidence for non-anticipatory eye movements in dynamic scenes during sentence comprehension

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (11) ◽  
pp. 986
Author(s):  
Roberto G. de Almeida ◽  
Caitlyn Antal ◽  
Julia Di Nardo
2019 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roberto G. de Almeida ◽  
Julia Di Nardo ◽  
Caitlyn Antal ◽  
Michael W. von Grünau

2012 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
LLORENÇ ANDREU ◽  
MÒNICA SANZ-TORRENT ◽  
JOHN C. TRUESWELL

ABSTRACTTwenty-five children with specific language impairment (SLI; age 5 years, 3 months [5;3]–8;2), 50 typically developing children (3;3–8;2), and 31 normal adults participated in three eye-tracking experiments of spoken language comprehension that were designed to investigate the use of verb information during real-time sentence comprehension in Spanish. In Experiment 1, participants heard sentences like El niño recorta con cuidado el papel (The boy trims carefully the paper) in the presence of four depicted objects, only one of which satisfied the semantic restrictions of the verb recorta (e.g., paper, clock, fox, and dinosaur). Eye movements revealed that children with SLI, like other groups, were able to recognize and retrieve the meaning of the verb rapidly enough to anticipate the upcoming semantically appropriate referent, prior to actually hearing the noun phrase el papel (the paper). Experiments 2 and 3 revealed that for all groups of participants, anticipatory eye movements were also modulated by the semantic fit of the object serving as the patient/theme of the verb. Relatively fine-grained semantic information of a verb was computed fast enough even by children with SLI to result in anticipatory eye movements to semantically appropriate referents. Children with SLI did differ from age-matched controls, but only slightly in terms of overall anticipatory looking at target objects; the time course of looking between these groups was quite similar. In addition, no differences were found between children with SLI and control children matched for mean length of utterance. Implications for theories that characterize SLI are discussed.


2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. e1007438 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chloé Pasturel ◽  
Anna Montagnini ◽  
Laurent Udo Perrinet

i-Perception ◽  
10.1068/ic335 ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 335-335
Author(s):  
Sheryl Chong ◽  
Neil Mennie

Vision ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 33 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carrick C. Williams ◽  
Monica S. Castelhano

The use of eye movements to explore scene processing has exploded over the last decade. Eye movements provide distinct advantages when examining scene processing because they are both fast and spatially measurable. By using eye movements, researchers have investigated many questions about scene processing. Our review will focus on research performed in the last decade examining: (1) attention and eye movements; (2) where you look; (3) influence of task; (4) memory and scene representations; and (5) dynamic scenes and eye movements. Although typically addressed as separate issues, we argue that these distinctions are now holding back research progress. Instead, it is time to examine the intersections of these seemingly separate influences and examine the intersectionality of how these influences interact to more completely understand what eye movements can tell us about scene processing.


2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (8) ◽  
pp. 1041-1058
Author(s):  
Arella E. Gussow ◽  
Efthymia C. Kapnoula ◽  
Nicola Molinaro

2011 ◽  
Vol 23 ◽  
pp. 96-97
Author(s):  
Umesh Patil ◽  
Sandra Hanne ◽  
Shravan Vasishth ◽  
Frank Burchert ◽  
Ria De Bleser

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document