scholarly journals Kin recognition and perceived facial similarity

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (6) ◽  
pp. 18
Author(s):  
Florian Hansen ◽  
Lisa M. DeBruine ◽  
Iris J. Holzleitner ◽  
Anthony J. Lee ◽  
Kieran J. O'Shea ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie JE Charpentier ◽  
Mélanie Harté ◽  
Clémence Poirotte ◽  
Jade Meric de Bellefon ◽  
Benjamin Laubi ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTAnimal faces convey important information such as individual health status1 or identity2,3. Human and nonhuman primates rely on highly heritable facial traits4,5 to recognize their kin6–8. However, whether these facial traits have evolved for this specific function of kin recognition remains unknown. We present the first unambiguous evidence that inter-individual facial similarity has been selected to signal kinship using a state-of-the-art artificial intelligence approach based on deep neural networks and long-term data on a natural population of nonhuman primates. The typical matrilineal society of mandrills, is characterized by an extreme male’s reproductive skew with one male generally siring the large majority of offspring born into the different matrilines each year9. Philopatric females are raised and live throughout their lives with familiar maternal half-sisters (MHS) but because of male’s reproductive monopolization, they also live with unfamiliar paternal half-sisters (PHS). Because kin selection predicts differentiated interactions with kin rather than nonkin10 and that PHS largely outnumber MHS in a mandrills’ social group, natural selection should favour mechanisms to recognize PHS. Here, we first show that PHS socially interact with each other as much as MHS do, both more than nonkin. Second, using artificial intelligence trained to recognize individual mandrills from a database of 16k portrait pictures, we demonstrate that facial similarity increases with genetic relatedness. However, PHS resemble more to each other than MHS do, despite both kin categories sharing similar degrees of genetic relatedness. We propose genomic imprinting as a plausible genetic mechanism to explain paternally-derived facial similarity among PHS selected to improve kin recognition. This study further highlights the potential of artificial intelligence to study evolutionary mechanisms driving variation between phenotypes.


2006 ◽  
Vol 6 (10) ◽  
pp. 4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laurence T. Maloney ◽  
Maria F. Dal Martello

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Florian Hansen ◽  
Iris Jasmin Holzleitner ◽  
Anthony J Lee ◽  
Kieran J. O'Shea ◽  
Lisa Marie DeBruine ◽  
...  

Kinship and facial self-resemblance evoke similar patterns of behaviour, such as increased pro-sociality and decreased sexual motivation. Moreover, it has been suggested that facial resemblance/similarity between individuals informs kinship judgments in third-party kin recognition as one study found that similarity and kinship judgments encapsulate the same information (Maloney & Dal Martello, 2006). Yet, another study found that similarity judgments convey some information that is not conveyed in kinship judgments when comparing adult face pairs of different sex (DeBruine et al., 2009). We replicated these studies to further investigate these convergent results and clarify the role facial similarity plays in third-party kin recognition. We recruited 318 raters, who were shown 50 sibling pairs and 50 age- and sex-matched unrelated pairs ranging from 3 to 17 years old. Each rater was randomly assigned to make either kinship judgments (“related” or “unrelated”) or similarity judgments (scale from 0-“not very similar” to 10-“very similar”). We found that performance in both tasks was equally accurate, with participants detecting child siblings in the kinship task above chance and giving significantly higher similarity ratings to siblings in the similarity task. In both tasks, opposite-sex siblings were less often perceived to be siblings less often than same-sex siblings, while judgments of unrelated face pairs were not affected by the sex of faces. In contrast, the effect of difference in age between pairs of faces differed for the two tasks: in the similarity task, sibling pairs’ similarity decreased with increasing age differences, while no such effect was observed for unrelated pairs. In the kinship task, an increasing age difference decreased relatedness judgments for both related and unrelated pairs. In line with DeBruine et al. (2009), these findings suggest that similarity and kinship judgments are highly correlated but not strictly synonymous. The OSF Pre-registration for this project can be found at osf.io/ps9hy and the data and code at osf.io/sef9k.


Author(s):  
Bettina von Helversen ◽  
Stefan M. Herzog ◽  
Jörg Rieskamp

Judging other people is a common and important task. Every day professionals make decisions that affect the lives of other people when they diagnose medical conditions, grant parole, or hire new employees. To prevent discrimination, professional standards require that decision makers render accurate and unbiased judgments solely based on relevant information. Facial similarity to previously encountered persons can be a potential source of bias. Psychological research suggests that people only rely on similarity-based judgment strategies if the provided information does not allow them to make accurate rule-based judgments. Our study shows, however, that facial similarity to previously encountered persons influences judgment even in situations in which relevant information is available for making accurate rule-based judgments and where similarity is irrelevant for the task and relying on similarity is detrimental. In two experiments in an employment context we show that applicants who looked similar to high-performing former employees were judged as more suitable than applicants who looked similar to low-performing former employees. This similarity effect was found despite the fact that the participants used the relevant résumé information about the applicants by following a rule-based judgment strategy. These findings suggest that similarity-based and rule-based processes simultaneously underlie human judgment.


Author(s):  
Doo-Hwang Lee ◽  
Joung-Huem Kwon ◽  
Young-Nam Seo ◽  
Bum-Jae You
Keyword(s):  

Heredity ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 92 (2) ◽  
pp. 53-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Carlsson ◽  
J E L Carlsson ◽  
K H Olsén ◽  
M M Hansen ◽  
T Eriksson ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document