scholarly journals On Evaluation of Ensemble Forecast Calibration Using the Concept of Data Depth

2017 ◽  
Vol 145 (5) ◽  
pp. 1679-1690 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahsa Mirzargar ◽  
Jeffrey L. Anderson

Abstract Various generalizations of the univariate rank histogram have been proposed to inspect the reliability of an ensemble forecast or analysis in multidimensional spaces. Multivariate rank histograms provide insightful information about the misspecification of genuinely multivariate features such as the correlation between various variables in a multivariate ensemble. However, the interpretation of patterns in a multivariate rank histogram should be handled with care. The purpose of this paper is to focus on multivariate rank histograms designed based on the concept of data depth and outline some important considerations that should be accounted for when using such multivariate rank histograms. To generate correct multivariate rank histograms using the concept of data depth, the datatype of the ensemble should be taken into account to define a proper preranking function. This paper demonstrates how and why some preranking functions might not be suitable for multivariate or vector-valued ensembles and proposes preranking functions based on the concept of simplicial depth that are applicable to both multivariate points and vector-valued ensembles. In addition, there exists an inherent identifiability issue associated with center-outward preranking functions used to generate multivariate rank histograms. This problem can be alleviated by complementing the multivariate rank histogram with other well-known multivariate statistical inference tools based on rank statistics such as the depth-versus-depth (DD) plot. Using a synthetic example, it is shown that the DD plot is less sensitive to sample size compared to multivariate rank histograms.

1985 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 265-274 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wayne Hall ◽  
Kevin Bird

This paper deals with the problem of multiple inference in psychiatric research, an issue which arises whenever a researcher has to make more than one statistical inference in a single research study. It frequently arises in psychiatric research because of multivariate study designs, with subjects being measured on more than one dependent variable with the intention of studying differences between groups in mean scores. The disadvantages of the commonly adopted strategy of using multiple univariate tests (e.g. multiple t-tests) are outlined. Two broad strategies — Bonferroni-adjusted univariate tests and multivariate statistical analysis — are introduced. Their advantages and disadvantages are discussed in terms of their usefulness in confirmatory and exploratory research in psychiatry.


2017 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 137-158
Author(s):  
Makoto Aoshima ◽  
Kazuyoshi Yata

2018 ◽  
Vol 93 ◽  
pp. 313-321 ◽  
Author(s):  
Homero de Leon-Delgado ◽  
Rolando J. Praga-Alejo ◽  
David S. Gonzalez-Gonzalez ◽  
Mario Cantú-Sifuentes

1988 ◽  
Vol 52 (4) ◽  
pp. 794 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric A. Rexstad ◽  
Dirk D. Miller ◽  
Curtis H. Flather ◽  
Eric M. Anderson ◽  
Jerry W. Hupp ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document