scholarly journals Paying for Mental Health Care in Private Health Insurance in the Netherlands: Some Lessons for the United States

2020 ◽  
Vol 71 (6) ◽  
pp. 538-539
Author(s):  
Thomas G. McGuire ◽  
Richard C. van Kleef ◽  
Suzanne H. C. M. van Veen
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
United States ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Health Insurance ◽  
The Netherlands ◽  
Mental Health Care ◽  
Private Health Insurance ◽  
The United States

scholarly journals Rates and Associated Factors of Secondary Mental Health Care Utilisation among Ex-Military Personnel in the United States: A Narrative Review

Healthcare ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katharine Mark ◽  
Dominic Murphy ◽  
Sharon Stevelink ◽  
Nicola Fear
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
United States ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Mental Health Care ◽  
Military Personnel ◽  
Mental Health Problems ◽  
The United States ◽  
Health Care Utilisation ◽  
Narrative Review ◽  
Care Utilisation

Little is known about ex-serving military personnel who access secondary mental health care. This narrative review focuses on studies that quantitatively measure secondary mental health care utilisation in ex-serving personnel from the United States. The review aimed to identify rates of mental health care utilisation, as well as the factors associated with it. The electronic bibliographic databases OVID Medline, PsycInfo, PsycArticles, and Embase were searched for studies published between January 2001 and September 2018. Papers were retained if they included ex-serving personnel, where the majority of the sample had deployed to the recent conflicts in Iraq or Afghanistan. Fifteen studies were included. Modest rates of secondary mental health care utilisation were found in former military members—for mean percentage prevalence rates, values ranged from 12.5% for at least one psychiatric inpatient episode, to 63.2% for at least one outpatient mental health appointment. Individuals engaged in outpatient care visits most often, most likely because these appointments are the most commonly offered source of support. Post-traumatic stress disorder, particularly re-experiencing symptoms, and comorbid mental health problems were most consistently associated with higher mental health care utilisation. Easily accessible interventions aimed at facilitating higher rates of help seeking in ex-serving personnel are recommended.

Three Steps for Improving the Quality of Mental Health Care in the United States

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kavita Patel ◽  
Brittany Butler ◽  
Kenneth Wells
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
United States ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Mental Health Care ◽  
The United States

Computers and process description for community mental health care

1997 ◽  
Vol 6 (S1) ◽  
pp. 81-90
Author(s):  
Rob Bale ◽  
Matthew Fiander ◽  
Tom Burns
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
United States ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Case Management ◽  
Mental Health Care ◽  
Mental Health Professionals ◽  
Assertive Community Treatment ◽  
The United States ◽  
Community Treatment ◽  
Practice Characteristics

The focus of mental health care has seen a significant shift from institutional care to community based care and has been well described (Thornicroft & Bebbington, 1989). This shift has necessitated the development of new and flexible models for ensuring that patients' needs are met. Mental health professionals have to operate across a wide range of community contexts dealing with a complex range of needs. Intensive Case Management (ICM) also known as Assertive Community Treatment is a model of service provision to the long term mentally ill in the community. The Programme of Assertive Community Treatment (ACT) developed by Stein & Test (1980) in the United States has a number of Key elements (figure 1).ACT-based ICM is unusual in that it has been extensively researched (principally in the United States of America), and programmes are relatively well described. Such descriptions, especially of programmes outside America, often focus on underlying principals and philosophies and do little to measure practice. Teague et al. (1995), however, devised clear criteria for measuring practice components and McGrew et al. (1994) asked ACT “experts” to rate the “key” elements of PACT and related a number of these to levels of hospital use. In the United Kingdom, Thornicroft (1991) listed twelve axes for describing the central practice characteristics of case management (a broad concept including ICM). These UK ‘practice characteristics’ also focus more on macro-level programme description rather than on the practices of programme staff. There is a pressing need for research into exactly what teams do.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document