Private Practice and Community Mental Health

1966 ◽  
Vol 17 (12) ◽  
pp. 363-366
Author(s):  
Herbert C. Schulberg
1997 ◽  
Vol 6 (S1) ◽  
pp. 91-103 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vivianne Kovess

An abundant literature has been published about mental services evaluation and was used for purpose of comparisons between services.Comparisons have mainly concerned care in the traditional psychiatric hospital based mode versus community mental health (Tansella et al., 1982; Kraudy et al., 1987; Kovess et al., 1995) or care in different areas or countries (Sytema et al., 1989).Those comparisons have to rely on crude description of services (Tansella et al., 1986) like psychiatric hospitalisation, day hospitalisation or out patient intervention. Intensive international collaboration underpinned the importance of a more precise description about services which could have extremely different components under the same label.In fact services in mental health are complex to describe to allow meaningful comparisons because they cover many different actions given by a variety of providers and grouped into various structures as: •hospitals: specialised or general, large or small;•day hospitals and centre;•out patients clinics, crisis centres.Care could also be provided by independent workers from the diverse medical and non medical professions involved in the mental health fields in private practice settings.


2012 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 255-261 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sabine Loos ◽  
Reinhold Kilian ◽  
Thomas Becker ◽  
Birgit Janssen ◽  
Harald Freyberger ◽  
...  

Objective: There are presently no instruments available in German language to assess the therapeutic relationship in psychiatric care. This study validates the German version of the Scale to Assess the Therapeutic Relationship in Community Mental Health Care (D-STAR). Method: 460 persons with severe mental illness and 154 clinicians who had participated in a multicenter RCT testing a discharge planning intervention completed the D-STAR. Psychometric properties were established via item analysis, analyses of missing values, internal consistency, and confirmatory factor analysis. Furthermore, convergent validity was scrutinized via calculating correlations of the D-STAR scales with two measures of treatment satisfaction. Results: As in the original English version, fit indices of a 3-factor model of the therapeutic relationship were only moderate. However, the feasibility and internal consistency of the D-STAR was good, and correlations with other measures suggested reasonable convergent validity. Conclusions: The psychometric properties of the D-STAR are acceptable. Its use can be recommended in German-speaking countries to assess the therapeutic relationship in both routine care and research.


1976 ◽  
Vol 21 (10) ◽  
pp. 705-706
Author(s):  
BONNIE SPRING

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document