Lobular Neoplasia: Is Surgical Excision Warranted?

2008 ◽  
Vol 74 (2) ◽  
pp. 172-177 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vance Y. Sohn ◽  
Zachary M. Arthurs ◽  
Flora S. Kim ◽  
Tommy A. Brown

The treatment of breast cancer associated with lobular neoplasia detected on core needle biopsy (CNB) remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to review the prevalence of lobular neoplasia in CNB specimens and to correlate CNB pathology to final surgical pathology. Patients with lobular neoplasia were included for analysis in this retrospective review. Patients with concomitant malignant or atypical lesions were excluded. Method of initial diagnosis, clinical history, pathology results, and follow-up data were then analyzed. From January 1994 to December 2005, 5257 CNBs were performed at our tertiary level medical facility. Of patients with lobular neoplasia, 42 of 50 (84%) patients had atypical lobular hyperplasia, whereas 8 (16%) patients were diagnosed with lobular carcinoma in situ on CNB specimens. There were no associated malignancies in 21 patients who underwent immediate surgical excision. Of those patients who were serially followed, four developed malignancies at an average of 73 months after the sentinel diagnosis. Three of the four (75%) malignancies occurred in the ipsilateral breast. Patients with a diagnosis of lobular neoplasia by CNB should not routinely undergo an open surgical biopsy. Lobular neoplasia should only be considered a risk marker for future invasive breast cancer.

2015 ◽  
Vol 81 (9) ◽  
pp. 876-878 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shelby Allen ◽  
Edward A. Levine ◽  
Nadja Lesko ◽  
Marissa Howard-Mcnatt

The management of atypical lobular hyperplasia (ALH) on core biopsy remains controversial. The upstaging rates after surgical excision vary. We reviewed our upgrade rates and use of chemoprevention for ALH. Patients were identified through our pathology database for ALH from 2006 to 2013. Patients were included in the study that had a diagnosis only of ALH on core needle biopsy. Tumor and patient characteristics and final pathology were analyzed. ALH was identified in 56 patients since 2006. Sixteen patients met the inclusion criteria. All the patients underwent surgical excision. Final pathology of the excised specimens confirmed ALH in 62 per cent (n = 11). Two cases contained lobular carcinoma in situ. The upgrade rate on excisional biopsy was 18.75 per cent (n = 3) to invasive cancer. Chemopreventative treatment was taken by 44 per cent of the patients. After a mean follow-up of three years, none of the patients who received chemoprevention developed breast cancer. One patient who refused tamoxifen developed breast cancer. This is one of the few studies to examine the current treatment of ALH. We noted a significant upstaging rate after excision. We recommend women to undergo surgical excision. Patients should also consider chemoprevention to reduce their risk for developing breast cancer.


2008 ◽  
Vol 132 (6) ◽  
pp. 979-983 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joan Cangiarella ◽  
Amber Guth ◽  
Deborah Axelrod ◽  
Farbod Darvishian ◽  
Baljit Singh ◽  
...  

Abstract Context.—Both atypical lobular hyperplasia (ALH) and lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) have traditionally been considered to be risk factors for the development of invasive carcinoma and are followed by close observation. Recent studies have suggested that these lesions may represent true precursors with progression to invasive carcinoma. Due to the debate over the significance of these lesions and the small number of cases reported in the literature, the treatment for lobular neoplasia diagnosed by percutaneous core biopsy (PCB) remains controversial. Objective.—To review our experience with pure LCIS or ALH diagnosed by PCB and correlate the radiologic findings and surgical excision diagnoses to develop management guidelines for lobular neoplasia diagnosed by PCB. Design.—We searched the pathology database for patients who underwent PCB with a diagnosis of either pure LCIS or ALH and had subsequent surgical excision. We compared the core diagnoses with the surgical excision diagnoses and the radiologic findings. Results.—Thirty-eight PCBs with a diagnosis of ALH (18 cases) or LCIS (20 cases) were identified. Carcinoma was present at excision in 1 (6%) of the ALH cases and in 2 (10%) of the LCIS cases. In summary, 8% (3/38) of PCBs diagnosed as lobular neoplasia (ALH or LCIS) were upgraded to carcinoma (invasive carcinoma or ductal carcinoma in situ) at excision. Conclusions.—Surgical excision is indicated for all PCBs diagnosed as ALH or LCIS, as a significant percentage will show carcinoma at excision.


2012 ◽  
Vol 19 (10) ◽  
pp. 3131-3138 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miraj G. Shah-Khan ◽  
Xochiquetzal J. Geiger ◽  
Carol Reynolds ◽  
James W. Jakub ◽  
Elizabeth R. DePeri ◽  
...  

Breast Care ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Constanze Elfgen ◽  
Christoph Tausch ◽  
Ann-Katrin Rodewald ◽  
Uwe Güth ◽  
Christoph Rageth ◽  
...  

<b><i>Purpose:</i></b> Classical type of lobular neoplasia (LN) encompassing both atypical lobular hyperplasia and classical lobular carcinoma in situ of the breast is a lesion with uncertain malignant potential and has been the topic of several studies with conflicting outcome results. The aim of our study was to clarify outcome-relevant factors and treatment options of classical LN. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We performed a pathological re-evaluation of the preoperative biopsy specimens and a retrospective clinical and radiological data analysis of 160 patients with LN from the Breast Center Zurich. Open surgery was performed in 65 patients, vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB) in 79 patients, and surveillance after breast core needle biopsy (CNB) in 16 patients. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The upgrade rate into ductal carcinoma in situ/invasive cancer was the highest in case of imaging/histology discordance (40%). If the number of foci in the biopsy specimen was ≥3, the upgrade rate in the consecutive surgical specimens was increased (<i>p</i> = 0.01). The association of classical LN with histological microcalcification correlated with shortened disease-free survival (<i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.01), whereas other factors showed no impact on follow-up. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Surveillance or subsequent VAB after CNB of LN is sufficient in most cases. Careful consideration of individual radiological and histological factors is required to identify patients with a high risk of upgrade into malignancy. In those cases, surgical excision is indicated.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document