Postoperative Anticoagulants in Preventing Portal Vein Thrombosis in Patients Undergoing Splenectomy Because of Liver Cirrhosis: A Meta-Analysis

2016 ◽  
Vol 82 (12) ◽  
pp. 1169-1177 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jian-Ying Zhang ◽  
Yun-Bing Wang ◽  
Jian-Ping Gong ◽  
Fan Zhang ◽  
Yong Zhao

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) frequently occurs in patients undergoing splenectomy because of liver cirrhosis. Whether the use of postoperative anticoagulants can decrease the incidence of PVT in these subjects is inconclusive. Moreover, the safety of the use of postoperative anticoagulants in the aforementioned patients is a concern. This meta-analysis aims to explore the effectiveness and safety of the preventive anticoagulants to prevent PVT in patients undergoing splenectomy because of liver cirrhosis. Four English language databases (i.e., PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science) and four Chinese language databases (i.e., Wanfang, CNKI, Cqvip, and CBM) were searched for randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, and case-control studies on the use of preventive anticoagulants to prevent PVT in patients undergoing splenectomy because of liver cirrhosis from their inception to September 15, 2015. The primary outcome was postoperative PVT incidence. The secondary outcomes included postoperative complications and adverse reaction. Study-specific odds ratios were combined to calculate pooled value through a fixed effects model. A total of 17 original studies were included, involving 1,497 patients. This meta-analysis showed that the preventive anticoagulant group had a lower incidence of PVT than the no anticoagulant group (odds ratio, 0.31; 95% confidence interval, 0.23–0.40; P < 0.05). According to the description of limited studies, the upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage mainly occurred in the no anticoagulant group. Meanwhile, the adverse reaction was trivial in the group using anticoagulants, which could easily be released with no special management. Postoperative anticoagulants can effectively decrease PVT incidence in subjects undergoing splenectomy because of liver cirrhosis. These published studies are more prone to show that no serious negative influence of anticoagulants exists in the aspect of safety. However, further studies are still needed.

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-20
Author(s):  
Huan Chen ◽  
Jiaming Lei ◽  
Sicheng Liang ◽  
Gang Luo ◽  
Mingming Deng ◽  
...  

Background and Aims. Portal vein thrombosis is a serious adverse event that occurs during liver cirrhosis. We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the safety and efficacy of anticoagulant therapy and prophylactic anticoagulant therapy in cirrhosis patients with (/without) portal vein thrombosis. Methods. Eligible comparative studies were identified by searching the following electronic databases: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and CNKI. A meta-analysis was performed to calculate odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals using fixed-effects models. Recanalization and thrombus progression were defined as the primary outcomes. Secondary outcomes included adverse events and death mortality. Results. A total of 3479 patients were included in this analysis. Compared with the control group, the recanalization rate in the anticoagulant therapy group was increased P < 0.00001 in patients with cirrhosis and portal vein thrombosis without increasing adverse events. Multiple use of enoxaparin in small doses is safer than single large doses P = 0.004 . Direct oral anticoagulants are more effective P < 0.00001 and safer than traditional anticoagulants. Prophylactic anticoagulant therapy can effectively prevent portal vein thrombosis formation P < 0.00001 . Conclusions. Anticoagulation therapy can treat or prevent portal vein thrombosis in patients with liver cirrhosis and is a relatively safe treatment.


Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 1094-1094
Author(s):  
Kunhwa Kim ◽  
Faustine Ong ◽  
Gabor Varadi ◽  
Sorab Gupta ◽  
Vinicius Machado Jorge

Introduction Thrombocytopenia is common in liver cirrhosis patients, which often complicates with patients' frequent issue with gastrointestinal bleeding and procedural needs. Based on biologic understanding of decreased thrombopoietin(TPO) level in liver cirrhosis patients, use of TPO agonists in liver cirrhosis have been actively studied. Over the period of time, new studies have come out about 2 FDA-approved TPO agonists, Avatrombopag and Lusutrombopag, for prophylaxis before procedure in liver cirrhosis patients with thrombocytopenia. In the past, there have raised concerns of increased risk of portal vein thrombosis and other thrombotic risks in other agents. In our study, we aimed to study the effectiveness and safety of TPO receptor agonists for pre-procedural use in patients with liver cirrhosis. Study design Study was conducted from August 2018 to July 2019. Previous studies were identified through database searching MEDLINE, CENTRAL, Clinicaltrial.gov and google search. Randomized clinical trials with active treatment arm with TPO receptor agonists in the use of liver cirrhosis patients, with intention of pre-procedural prophylaxis, and having placebo for direct comparisons were included. One of the major exclusions was TPO receptor agonists to increase platelet counts for anti-viral treatment in cirrhosis patients. 14 studies were identified. Studies were reviewed and eligibility was determined by two independent clinically trained researchers. 5 duplicated studies were removed, and in total of 7 studies were included for quantitative and qualitative analysis. Details of studies were collected by 2 independent researchers and compared. When there is a discrepancy, repeat review of the study was conducted. Studies were conducted or published from 2012 to 2018. 1 trial from Eltrombopag, 3 trials from Avatrombopag, and 3 trials from Lusutrombopag were included. Result Characteristics of included studies are summarized in table 1. Our studies found that 5.5(95% CI : 4.35-7.15) times higher risk ratio(RR) of reaching platelet target before procedure compared to placebo. Target platelet number goal was 50,000 to 80,000 depending on the study. Studies showed homogenous result with I-squared was 30.8% and q-statistics of p-value 0.193.(Figure 1) Subgroup analysis by FDA-approved medication of Avatrombopag and Lusutrombopag showed statistically significant higher risk ratio of 4.74(3.36-6.68) and of 5.52(3.65-8.34) each compared to placebo. Risk ratio for preventing platelet transfusion was not able to be calculated with heterogeneity of study with I-square higher than 90%. Lusutrombopag study showed significant benefits (RR 6.33, 95% CI 2.95-13.58) with heterogeneity inside the same medications, which might be explained with different doses in studies. No statistical significance in risk ratio in a study with Avatrombopag. Subgroup analysis limited to phase 3 studies showed risk ratio of preventing transfusion of 2.87(95% CI 2.15-3.82) but heterogeneity with q-statistics of p-value at 0.029. Relative risk for adverse event related to portal vein thrombosis was not statistically significant with RR of 0.99(95% CI : 0.35-2.85) in total of 1,229 patients.(Figure 2) Study result was homogenous result by I-square 0%, q-statistics of p-value 0.794. Other severe adverse events, major bleeding risk, overall thrombosis risk were not statistically significant. Only increased risk without statistical significance was reported in trail with Eltrombopag which was early terminated. Conclusion Our meta-analysis of pre-procedural use of TPO agonist in liver cirrhosis patients showed statistically significant benefit of reaching platelet count goal by 5.58 times with risk ratio, but no benefit of preventing transfusion. Compared to prior studies including use of TPO agonists for Interferon-Ribavirin treatment, meta-analysis limited to pre-procedural use did not show statistically significant increase in portal vein thrombosis. Serious adverse events including thrombosis events and bleeding risk were not statistically significant. Most studies described that portal-vein thrombosis events were often related to high platelet counts about 200,000 and longer use of TPO agonist. In current era with lesser use of Interferon and Ribavirin as an anti-viral therapy, TPO agonists use in setting of pre-procedure mostly with lower platelet targets can be safely used. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yalin Liu ◽  
Wanwei Chen ◽  
Liangbi Xu ◽  
Haoyi Yang ◽  
Chenhong Duan ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to evaluate efficacy and safety of anticoagulant therapy in patients with chronic cirrhosis complicated with portal vein thrombosis (PVT). Methods: The PubMed, The Cochrane Library and Web of Science databases were searched. The odds ratio (OR) and risks ratio(RR) with 95% CI was pooled to calculate the difference in the rate of portal vein recanalization and occurrence of bleeding events between patients who received anticoagulation and those who did not. All meta-analysis were conducted by using a random-effects model. Results: 8 studies with a total of 559 patients published between 2005 and 2019 were finally enrolled in our meta-analysis . The rate of portal vein recanalization was significantly higher with PVT who received anticoagulation and those who did not (OR = 4.689, 95% (95% CI = 3.274–6.716, P=0.000). And the pooled risk ratio of bleeding between the two groups was 0.828 (95% CI = 0.511–1.343, P=0.444). The heterogeneity was not statistically significant among studies, Begg’s funnel plot and Egger’s linear regression test were performed to evaluate publicantion bias. Conclusion: Anticoagulation therapy can significantly improve the recanalization rate of PVT patients with cirrhosis, and the bleeding related events caused by anticoagulation are relatively low, which is worthy of clinical promotion. However, more prospective trials are needed to know how to use anticoagulants.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document