Differential Vibratory Characteristics of Adductor Spasmodic Dysphonia and Muscle Tension Dysphonia on High-Speed Digital Imaging

2011 ◽  
Vol 120 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rita R. Patel ◽  
Li Liu ◽  
Nikolaos Galatsanos ◽  
Diane M. Bless
1999 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
pp. 101-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maureen B. Higgins ◽  
David H. Chait ◽  
Laura Schulte

The purpose of this study was to determine if phonatory air flow characteristics differed among women with adductor spasmodic dysphonia (AdSD), muscle tension dysphonia (MTD), and normal phonation. Phonatory air flow signals were gathered during [pα] syllable repetitions. Mean phonatory air flow, coefficients of variation, and the presence of large air flow perturbations (75 ml/s or more) were examined for the three groups of speakers. There was no significant difference in mean phonatory air flow across groups, and very large intersubject variation in mean phonatory air flow occurred for both the AdSD and MTD groups. Coefficients of variation were similar for the groups of women with MTD and normal phonation but were significantly larger for the group with AdSD. Air flow perturbations were common with AdSD and rare with MTD. Relatively large coefficients of variation and air flow perturbations of at least 75 ml/s did occur for some women with normal voices who were 70 years of age or older. It appears that intrasubject variability in phonatory air flow may aid in the differentiation of AdSD and MTD when used in conjunction with other elements of a thorough voice evaluation. However, the potential contribution of aging to increased intrasubject variability in phonatory air flow must be considered when interpreting findings.


2007 ◽  
Vol 59 (2) ◽  
pp. 83-90 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nelson Roy ◽  
Shannon C. Mauszycki ◽  
Ray M. Merrill ◽  
Manon Gouse ◽  
Marshall E. Smith

2005 ◽  
Vol 115 (2) ◽  
pp. 311-316 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nelson Roy ◽  
Manon Gouse ◽  
Shannon C. Mauszycki ◽  
Ray M. Merrill ◽  
Marshall E. Smith

2017 ◽  
Vol 157 (4) ◽  
pp. 558-564 ◽  
Author(s):  
Justin M. Hintze ◽  
Christy L. Ludlow ◽  
Stephen F. Bansberg ◽  
Charles H. Adler ◽  
David G. Lott

Objective The purpose of this review is to describe the recent advances in characterizing spasmodic dysphonia. Spasmodic dysphonia is a task-specific focal laryngeal dystonia characterized by irregular and uncontrolled voice breaks. The pathophysiology is poorly understood, and there are diagnostic difficulties. Data Sources PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library. Review Methods The data sources were searched using the following search terms: ( spasmodic dysphonia or laryngeal dystonia) and ( etiology, aetiology, diagnosis, pathogenesis, or pathophysiology). Conclusion The diagnosis of spasmodic dysphonia can be difficult due to the lack of a scientific consensus on diagnostic criteria and the fact that other voice disorders may present similarly. Confusion can arise between spasmodic dysphonia and muscle tension dysphonia. Spasmodic dysphonia symptoms are tied to particular speech sounds, whereas muscle tension dysphonia is not. With the advent of more widespread use of high-speed laryngoscopy and videokymography, measures of the disruptions in phonation and delays in the onset of vocal fold vibration after vocal fold closure can be quantified. Recent technological developments have expanded our understanding of the pathophysiology of spasmodic dysphonia. Implications for Practice A 3-tiered approach, involving a questionnaire, followed by speech assessment and nasolaryngoscopy is the most widely accepted method for making the diagnosis in most cases. More experimental and invasive techniques such as electromyography and neuroimaging have been explored to further characterize spasmodic dysphonia and aid in diagnosing difficult cases.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document