Cochlear Implantation in Children with Inner Ear Malformations

1998 ◽  
Vol 107 (6) ◽  
pp. 492-500 ◽  
Author(s):  
Audie L. Woolley ◽  
Rodney P. Lusk ◽  
Virginia Jenison ◽  
Robert S. Bahadori ◽  
Barbara S. Stroer ◽  
...  

We performed a case study and intervention study, with follow-up of 1 to 5 years, in 4 children with inner ear malformations who underwent implantation of a multichannel cochlear implant (Nucleus, Cochlear Corporation) at ages 3 to 12 years. Malformations included a common cavity deformity, 2 incomplete partitions, and 1 case of isolated bilateral vestibular aqueduct enlargement. One child had a single-channel implant placed at 3 years of age, and this was exchanged for a 22-channel implant at age 9. One child had her implant placed at age 4.5 years, but due to complications from a cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak had the initial implant removed and replaced at age 5 years during repair of the CSF leak. Intraoperative findings included a CSF leak at the time of surgery in 3 patients. One patient contracted bacterial meningitis 7 months postimplantation that was thought to be secondary to acute otitis media in the unoperated ear. Bilateral CSF leaks were noted in the middle ear by a lumbar puncture radionuclide and fluorescein dye study. Successful repair of the CSF leaks and reimplantation of the cochlear implant was carried out in this patient. Mapping and programing of the implant was found to be challenging in each of these patients. All patients demonstrated improved performance after implantation. Two patients demonstrated some open-set speech perception. One patient demonstrates improved use of temporal cues in a structured closed set. One patient has achieved no significant speech recognition at this time, but does have improved sound detection and awareness. Cochlear implantation in children with congenital inner ear abnormalities can be a successful method of rehabilitation. It should be recognized that the postoperative speech perception results may be highly variable among patients, and that intraoperative complications may occur.

2017 ◽  
Vol 156 (5) ◽  
pp. 783-793 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zachary Farhood ◽  
Shaun A. Nguyen ◽  
Stephen C. Miller ◽  
Meredith A. Holcomb ◽  
Ted A. Meyer ◽  
...  

Objective (1) To analyze reported speech perception outcomes in patients with inner ear malformations who undergo cochlear implantation, (2) to review the surgical complications and findings, and (3) to compare the 2 classification systems of Jackler and Sennaroglu. Data Sources PubMed, Scopus (including Embase), Medline, and CINAHL Plus. Review Methods Fifty-nine articles were included that contained speech perception and/or intraoperative data. Cases were differentiated depending on whether the Jackler or Sennaroglu malformation classification was used. A meta-analysis of proportions examined incidences of complete insertion, gusher, and facial nerve aberrancy. For speech perception data, weighted means and standard deviations were calculated for all malformations for short-, medium-, and long-term follow-up. Speech tests were grouped into 3 categories—closed-set words, open-set words, and open-set sentences—and then compared through a comparison-of-means t test. Results Complete insertion was seen in 81.8% of all inner ear malformations (95% CI: 72.6-89.5); gusher was reported in 39.1% of cases (95% CI: 30.3-48.2); and facial nerve anomalies were encountered in 34.4% (95% CI: 20.1-50.3). Significant improvements in average performance were seen for closed- and open-set tests across all malformation types at 12 months postoperatively. Conclusions Cochlear implantation outcomes are favorable for those with inner ear malformations from a surgical and speech outcome standpoint. Accurate classification of anatomic malformations, as well as standardization of postimplantation speech outcomes, is necessary to improve understanding of the impact of implantation in this difficult patient population.


2012 ◽  
Vol 76 (9) ◽  
pp. 1370-1374 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dimitrios Rachovitsas ◽  
George Psillas ◽  
Vasiliki Chatzigiannakidou ◽  
Stefanos Triaridis ◽  
Jiannis Constantinidis ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 41 (4) ◽  
pp. 331-336 ◽  
Author(s):  
Levent Sennaroğlu ◽  
Gamze Atay ◽  
Münir Demir Bajin

2018 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 232-237
Author(s):  
Peter Bako ◽  
Adrienn Nemeth ◽  
Krisztian Molnar ◽  
Tamas Toth ◽  
Kinga Harmat ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
H. Skarzynski ◽  
M. Porowski ◽  
M. Mrówka ◽  
P. Mlotkowska-Klimek ◽  
A. Lorens ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 29 (5) ◽  
pp. 626-634 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana H. Kim ◽  
Paul R. Kileny ◽  
H. Alexander Arts ◽  
Hussam K. El-Kashlan ◽  
Steven A. Telian ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 74 (6) ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Małgorzata Burzyńska-Makuch ◽  
Józef Mierzwiński ◽  
Karolina Haber

<b>Introduction:</b> Preoperative imaging, besides audiological evaluation, plays a major role in evaluation of candidacy for auditory implants, and in particular cochlear implants. It is essential to assess whether the basic criteria necessary for implantation are met. Diagnostic imaging is crucial not only in determining candidacy, but also determining the feasibility of cochlear implantation as it allow to anticipate surgical difficulties which could preclude or complicate the implantation of the device. The aim of the study is to present the protocol for the evaluation of preoperative imaging studies with particular focus on the factors potentially affecting clinical decisions in children qualified for cochlear implantation. <br><b>Material and method:</b> Preoperative imaging studies of 111 children performed prior to cochlear implantation were analyzed: high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) of temporal bones and MRI. The assessment was made according to the presented protocol. <br><b>Results:</b> Pathologies and anomalies identified during the assessment of preoperative imaging studies significantly altered clinical decisions in 30% of patients. In the study group, in 17% of patients inner ear malformations were identified. 2.7% of children were disqualified from a cochlear implantation due to severe congenital inner ear malformations. 9% of the patients have had bacterial meningitis. In 50% of them difficulties related to complete or progressive cochlear ossification occurred. In 4.5% of patients less common surgical approaches other than mastoidectomy with a posterior tympanotomy were applied. <br><b>Discussion:</b> Preoperative imaging allow for the identification of significant pathologies and anomalies affecting qualification decisions and further treatment. HRCT and MRI are complementary to each other for preoperative imaging. The two modalities in combination allow accurate and optimal evaluation of the anatomical structures prior to implantation. Inner ear malformations and cochlear ossification following meningitis are relatively frequently encountered in children qualified for a cochlear implant.


2013 ◽  
Vol 149 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. P219-P219
Author(s):  
Jacek Szudek ◽  
Shani Dettman ◽  
Linda Zraika ◽  
Robert Briggs

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Micol Busi ◽  
Monica Rosignoli ◽  
Alessandro Castiglione ◽  
Federica Minazzi ◽  
Patrizia Trevisi ◽  
...  

Background. Specific clinical conditions could compromise cochlear implantation outcomes and drastically reduce the chance of an acceptable development of perceptual and linguistic capabilities. These conditions should certainly include the presence of inner ear malformations or brain abnormalities. The aims of this work were to study the diagnostic value of high resolution computed tomography (HRCT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in children with sensorineural hearing loss who were candidates for cochlear implants and to analyse the anatomic abnormalities of the ear and brain in patients who underwent cochlear implantation. We also analysed the effects of ear malformations and brain anomalies on the CI outcomes, speculating on their potential role in the management of language developmental disorders.Methods. The present study is a retrospective observational review of cochlear implant outcomes among hearing-impaired children who presented ear and/or brain anomalies at neuroimaging investigations with MRI and HRCT. Furthermore, genetic results from molecular genetic investigations (GJB2/GJB6and, additionally, in selected cases,SLC26A4or mitochondrial-DNA mutations) on this study group were herein described. Longitudinal and cross-sectional analysis was conducted using statistical tests.Results. Between January 1, 1996 and April 1, 2012, at the ENT-Audiology Department of the University Hospital of Ferrara, 620 cochlear implantations were performed. There were 426 implanted children at the time of the present study (who were <18 years). Among these, 143 patients (64 females and 79 males) presented ear and/or brain anomalies/lesions/malformations at neuroimaging investigations with MRI and HRCT. The age of the main study group (143 implanted children) ranged from 9 months and 16 years (average = 4.4; median = 3.0).Conclusions. Good outcomes with cochlear implants are possible in patients who present with inner ear or brain abnormalities, even if central nervous system anomalies represent a negative prognostic factor that is made worse by the concomitant presence of cochlear malformations. Common cavity and stenosis of the internal auditory canal (less than 2 mm) are negative prognostic factors even if brain lesions are absent.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document