A 10-Year Review of a Minimally Invasive Technique for the Correction of Pectus Excavatum

2000 ◽  
Vol 39 (9) ◽  
pp. 563-563
2006 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 105-107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mirko Žganjer ◽  
Božidar Župančić ◽  
Ljiljana Popović

The aim of this study was to assess the results of 5-year experience with minimally invasive operation without medial incision and resection cartilages for correction of pectum excavatum. From 2000 we made in our Hospital minimally invasive technique for the correction of pectus excavatum. 75 patients were treated by minimally invasive technique. A convex steel bar is inserted under the sternumtrough small bilateral Incisions. The steel bar is inserted with the convexity facing posteriorly, and when it is in position, the bar is turned over. After 2 years the bar is removed when permanent remolding has occurred. Initial excelent results were maintained in 54 patients (normal chest), good results in 16 (mild residual pectus) and poor in 5 (severe recurrence requiring further treatment). The mean follow-up since surgery were 3 months to 3 years. Average blood loss was 25 ml. Average length of hospital stay was 8 days. Patients returned to full activity after 2 month. Complications were pneumothorax in 12 patients, pneumonia in 6 patients and displacement of the steel barr requiring revision in 2 patients. Poor results occurred because steel bar was too soft in 3 patients, and soft sternum in 2 patients with Marfan’s syndrome. The minimally invesive technique is effective without cartilage incision and resection or sternal osteotomy.


Author(s):  
David L Moore ◽  
Kenneth R Goldschneider

Pectus excavatum is a defect in the proper growth of the sternum and adjacent costal cartilages, causing posterior depression of the chest. Pectus deformities account for more than 90% of congenital chest wall deformities. Evidence supports surgical repair, as many patients experience progressive cardiopulmonary symptoms over time. The most common symptoms include dyspnea with exercise and loss of endurance. An increasingly common method of repair is the Nuss minimally invasive technique, in which rigid bars are placed under the sternum and the costal cartilages with thoracoscopic guidance for a period of time until permanent remodeling of the chest is achieved.


1998 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 545-552 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald Nuss ◽  
Robert E Kelly ◽  
Daniel P Croitoru ◽  
Michael E Katz

CHEST Journal ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 126 (4) ◽  
pp. 799S
Author(s):  
Andre Hebra ◽  
Jeffrey Jacobs ◽  
Alexander Feliz ◽  
Claudia B. Moore

2021 ◽  
pp. 155335062098822
Author(s):  
Eirini Giovannopoulou ◽  
Anastasia Prodromidou ◽  
Nikolaos Blontzos ◽  
Christos Iavazzo

Objective. To review the existing studies on single-site robotic myomectomy and test the safety and feasibility of this innovative minimally invasive technique. Data Sources. PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar (from their inception to October 2019), as well as Clinicaltrials.gov databases up to April 2020. Methods of Study Selection. Clinical trials (prospective or retrospective) that reported the outcomes of single-site robotic myomectomy, with a sample of at least 20 patients were considered eligible for the review. Results. The present review was performed in accordance with the guidelines for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Four (4) studies met the inclusion criteria, and a total of 267 patients were included with a mean age from 37.1 to 39.1 years and BMI from 21.6 to 29.4 kg/m2. The mean operative time ranged from 131.4 to 154.2 min, the mean docking time from 5.1 to 5.45 min, and the mean blood loss from 57.9 to 182.62 ml. No intraoperative complications were observed, and a conversion rate of 3.8% was reported by a sole study. The overall postoperative complication rate was estimated at 2.2%, and the mean hospital stay ranged from 0.57 to 4.7 days. No significant differences were detected when single-site robotic myomectomy was compared to the multiport technique concerning operative time, blood loss, and total complication rate. Conclusion. Our findings support the safety of single-site robotic myomectomy and its equivalency with the multiport technique on the most studied outcomes. Further studies are needed to conclude on the optimal minimally invasive technique for myomectomy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document