The Gospel of Matthew and Apocalyptic Discourse

2020 ◽  
pp. 001452462097728
Author(s):  
David H. Wenkel
Keyword(s):  
Gospel Of Matthew ◽  
Theological Interpretation ◽  
Discourse Functions ◽  
Symbolic Universe

This study considers how ‘apocalyptic discourse’ functions within Matthew’s Gospel. Of the four gospels, Matthew has been called the most ‘apocalyptic’ in nature but most of the discussion of this literary feature has been limited to chapters 24-25. However, the violent scenes in Matthew 2 along with 24-25 form an inclusio for the whole of Matthew’s Gospel and provide a basis for relating other apocalyptic discourses. This study maintains that Matthew is a bios with elements of apocalyptic discourse woven throughout it. This paper offers a theological interpretation of Matthew that integrates the concepts of apocalyptic warfare and a three-tiered symbolic universe.

THE THEOLOGICAL INTERPRETATION OF THE FIGURE OF JESUS IN THE GOSPEL OF MATTHEW: SOME PRINCIPAL FEATURES IN MATTHEAN CHRISTOLOGY

1999 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 157-173 ◽  
Author(s):  
MOGENS MÜLLER
Keyword(s):  
Gospel Of Matthew ◽  
Theological Interpretation ◽  
Redaction Criticism ◽  
Special Trait ◽  
The Real ◽  
The Impact ◽  
The Way

In the wake of redaction-criticism it has become customary to treat the evangelists as theologians. This study is an attempt to elucidate how the Gospel of Matthew defines the impact of Jesus on salvation in a reinterpretation of tradition. Following a new trend in christological studies, emphasis has been laid not so much on the different christological titles as on the way the Jesus story is told as articulating the writer's christology. A special trait in Matthew is its meeknes Christology, and great importance is also given to Jesus as the Teacher par excellence. God being the real actor in the gospel story, the Christology of Matthew turns out to be theology in the sense of soteriology.

Features of Christian-Theological Interpretation of the Concept of Personality

2007 ◽  
pp. 76-85
Author(s):  
Yuliya Kostantynivna Nedzelska
Keyword(s):  
Great Difficulty ◽  
Theological Interpretation ◽  
Early Christian ◽  
The Individual

The concept of "personality" is multifaceted and multifaceted in its basis, and therefore, in science has always been a great difficulty in determining its essence and content. For example, in Antiquity, "personality" as such, dissolves in the concept of "society". There is no "human" yet, but there is a genus, a community, a people that are only quantitatively formed from the mass of different individuals, governed and subordinated to any one idea (custom, tribal or ethno-religious) espoused by this society. In other words, in such societies, the individual was not unique and unique; his personality (we understand - personality) was limited to the general, the collective. This is confirmed by the Jewish and early Christian texts.

Features And Discourse Functions Of Good Academic Writign

2019 ◽  
pp. 143
Author(s):  
Ihssan Abdulkadhum Jabor Al-Muslimawi
Keyword(s):  
Discourse Functions

Non-canonical gender in Mopan Maya

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ellen Contini–Morava ◽  
Eve Danziger
Keyword(s):  
Sex Differentiation ◽  
Proper Names ◽  
Mopan Maya ◽  
Discourse Functions ◽  
And Gender

Mopan (Mayan, Belize/Guatemala) has two noun classifiers that resemble gender markers. However, the gender markers (GMs) violate expectations about canonical gender (Corbett and Fedden 2016): only a minority of Mopan nouns are gendered; gender is marked only together with the noun, not in multiple syntactic domains; gender marking can be omitted in certain syntactic contexts; and gender marking can be introduced when a normally non-gendered noun co-occurs with an adjectival modifier. We address the grammatical and discourse functions of Mopan GMs in relation to their non-canonical properties. Two productive functions—use as honorific titles with proper names and derivation of agentive nominals—are extended to various functions involving agentivity and differentiation, e.g. derivation of descriptive terms for non-human implements and terms for varietal subcategories. GMs are also employed creatively in discourse, e.g. to suggest animacy of inanimates or to introduce sex differentiation where it would not otherwise be signalled.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document