The Monitoring of GMP Compliance in the Development of Medicinal Products in the United Kingdom

1994 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 983-986
Author(s):  
John Taylor
2019 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 204209861986541 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nikhil Raj ◽  
Swapnil Fernandes ◽  
Narayana R. Charyulu ◽  
Akhilesh Dubey ◽  
Ravi G. S. ◽  
...  

Regulatory approvals for the marketing of medicinal products authorize medical practitioners to prescribe drugs to a group of patients that are defined within the license of the medicinal product. However, such prescriptions are carried out in a controlled manner. Prior to being approved, the medicinal product will have been evaluated in a population pool containing fewer than 5,000 patients and in a predesigned environment where several factors may be lacking, such as the absence of women of childbearing potential, geriatric patients and paediatric patients. Therefore, it is not surprising that several major adverse drug reactions are detected only when the product has been prescribed to the general population. National and international regulatory bodies have devised systems for monitoring medicinal products after marketing, commonly known as postmarketing surveillance systems. Postmarketing surveillance refers to the process of monitoring the safety of drugs once they reach the market, after the successful completion of clinical trials. The primary purpose for conducting postmarketing surveillance is to identify previously unrecognized adverse effects as well as positive effects. The Yellow Card scheme, practiced in the United Kingdom and the Canada Vigilance Program adopted in the Canadian jurisdiction, are two of the most successful postmarketing surveillance systems implemented across the world. Therefore, this article intends to discuss postmarketing surveillance and its role in the context of the United Kingdom and Canadian jurisdictions with a view on presenting key aspects and measures that are employed for operating an efficient postmarketing surveillance system in regulated markets.


1997 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 315-336 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.J. Treece

The regulation of medicines in the United Kingdom has changed radically over the course of the last thirty years. Originally regulation was generally concerned with maintaining the quality and purity of drugs, investigations concerning the efficiency or safety of medicinal products are a more recent phenomenon. Regulation of medicine is now overseen by the European Union and licensing applications that are approved under this new scheme are likely to have wide implications not only for the Member States of the EU, but for non-Member States who have signed to the European Free Trade Agreement (EFTA), and possibly for producers of medicines in the United States. The regulatory system that currently applies in the UK, named the “Future System” of medicinal regulation came into being in January 1995. Although in its early days this paper examines the regulation of medicine in both the United Kingdom, and Europe; giving a broad outline of the new regulatory structure; and comparing and contrasting the way that Europe and the United States of America regulates and approves medicines. The final section considers the performance of the new regulatory structure by an examination of the first general report of the European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products, along with the results of a questionnaire survey conducted primarily with pharmaceutical manufacturers in the UK which aimed to elicit their views on how the new regulatory system is working, and whether it is operating to the standards which are expected of it.


2009 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nishan Fernando ◽  
Gordon Prescott ◽  
Jennifer Cleland ◽  
Kathryn Greaves ◽  
Hamish McKenzie

1990 ◽  
Vol 35 (8) ◽  
pp. 800-801
Author(s):  
Michael F. Pogue-Geile

1992 ◽  
Vol 37 (10) ◽  
pp. 1076-1077
Author(s):  
Barbara A. Gutek

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document