Productivity and the Moral Manager

2002 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 347-369 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas D. Lynch ◽  
Cynthia E. Lynch ◽  
Peter L. Cruise
Keyword(s):  
1999 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 583-591 ◽  
Author(s):  
John R. Boatright

Abstract:This presidential address to the Society for Business Ethics argues that business ethics rests upon the mistaken assumption that teaching and research in the field ought to aim at the incorporation of ethics into managerial decision making. An alternative to this Moral Manager Model is a Moral Market Model, in which the aim is to develop markets that produce ethical outcomes. The differences between the two models are discussed with reference to the themes of responsibility, participation, and relationships.


1989 ◽  
Vol 26 (06) ◽  
pp. 26-3348-26-3348
Keyword(s):  

2006 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 113-133 ◽  
Author(s):  
STEPHEN M. KING
Keyword(s):  

1987 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 7-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Archie B Carroll
Keyword(s):  

1993 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 97-116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael G. Bowen ◽  
F. Clark Power

For many, the case of the Exxon Valdez oil spill has become a symbol of unethical corporate behavior. Had Exxon’s managers not callously pursued their own interests at the expense of the environment and other parties, the accident would not have happened. In this paper, we (1) present a short case study of the Valdez incident; (2) argue that many analyses of the case either ignore or fail to give sufficient weight to the uncertainties managers often face when they make decisions; and (3) propose a framework for moral management grounded in principles of communicative ethics, moral dialogue, and in the non-traditional ideas of many current management and behavioral decision theorists. From this view, the moral manager is not expected to know the “correct” answer to every ethical issue, but rather to participate responsibly in an open dialogue with other interested parties.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document