Statistical Comparison of Four Effect Sizes for Single-Subject Designs

2004 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 234-246 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan M. Campbell
2018 ◽  
Vol 88 (4) ◽  
pp. 479-507 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean Stockard ◽  
Timothy W. Wood ◽  
Cristy Coughlin ◽  
Caitlin Rasplica Khoury

Quantitative mixed models were used to examine literature published from 1966 through 2016 on the effectiveness of Direct Instruction. Analyses were based on 328 studies involving 413 study designs and almost 4,000 effects. Results are reported for the total set and subareas regarding reading, math, language, spelling, and multiple or other academic subjects; ability measures; affective outcomes; teacher and parent views; and single-subject designs. All of the estimated effects were positive and all were statistically significant except results from metaregressions involving affective outcomes. Characteristics of the publications, methodology, and sample were not systematically related to effect estimates. Effects showed little decline during maintenance, and effects for academic subjects were greater when students had more exposure to the programs. Estimated effects were educationally significant, moderate to large when using the traditional psychological benchmarks, and similar in magnitude to effect sizes that reflect performance gaps between more and less advantaged students.


2008 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 385-401 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robyn L Tate ◽  
Skye Mcdonald ◽  
Michael Perdices ◽  
Leanne Togher ◽  
Regina Schultz ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (4S) ◽  
Author(s):  
Naomi Hashimoto

Purpose The aims of the study were to investigate the use of semantic associative relationships as primes in treating naming deficits, or anomia, in aphasia and to determine if differential treatment effects would be found if 1 or 3 primes were presented. Method Ten individuals with varying degrees of anomia participated in the study. A single-subject, A-B treatment design with a cross-over component was used. A 1-PRIME condition (use of 1 prime) was compared with a 3-PRIMES condition (use of 3 primes) for each participant. Results Visual analyses of treatment data revealed improvements in 8 of 10 participants. Meaningful effect sizes were obtained in at least 1 of the conditions for 6 of the 10 participants. Slightly more participants demonstrated meaningful effect sizes in the 3-PRIMES condition than in the 1-PRIME condition. Correlation analyses revealed a positive correlation between the number of teaching episodes and 3-PRIMES probe performance. Conclusions The results support a protocol that uses semantic associative primes to increase naming accuracy in aphasia. The 3-PRIMES condition was slightly more beneficial than the 1-PRIME condition in terms of improving naming abilities in these participants, but there was no overwhelming advantage in using one or the other condition.


Aphasiology ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 445-473 ◽  
Author(s):  
RANDALL R. ROBEY ◽  
MARTIN C. SCHULTZ ◽  
AMY B. CRAWFORD ◽  
CHERYL A. SINNER

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document