Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement: extracorporeal circulation optimization and minimally invasive extracorporeal circulation system evolution

Perfusion ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (8) ◽  
pp. 865-869 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roberto Carozza ◽  
Diego Fazzi ◽  
Armando Pietrini ◽  
Mariano Cefarelli ◽  
Francesca Mazzocca ◽  
...  

Treatment of aortic valve disease has become less and less invasive during the last years, thanks to progress in anesthesiology, surgical techniques, and perfusion management. In fact, it has been demonstrated that shorter skin incision, combined with ultra-fast-track anesthesia and minimized extracorporeal circuit could improve clinical outcomes. Current evidence shows that minimally invasive extracorporeal circulation system is associated with reduced red blood cells’ transfusion rate, improved end-organ perfusion, decreased incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation, air embolism leakage, and so less cerebral accidents with better neurological outcomes. Moreover, the use of a closed circuit seems to be more physiologic for the patients, reducing systemic inflammatory response due to less air–blood contact and the use of biocompatible surfaces. In the literature, the benefits of minimally invasive extracorporeal circulation are described mostly for coronary surgery but few data are nowadays available for minimally invasive extracorporeal circulation during aortic valve replacement. In this article, we describe our perfusion protocol in minimally invasive aortic valve replacement.

2019 ◽  
Vol 178 (3) ◽  
pp. 16-20
Author(s):  
M. A. Snegirev ◽  
A. A. Paivin ◽  
D. O. Denisyuk ◽  
N. E. Khvan ◽  
L. B. Sichinava ◽  
...  

The OBJECTIVE was to demonstrate clinical outcomes of minimally invasive aortic valve replacement (MIAVR).MATERIAL AND METHODS. We retrospectively analyzed surgical results of treatment of patients underwent isolated AVR in our Institution between 2006 and 2018. Overall number of operations was 122; 56 of patient were operated via upper ministernotomy approach. Preoperative characteristics were similar in both groups.RESULTS. In our series MIAVR procedures had prolonged CPB and aortic cross clamping time, what significantly contributed to the increase in manifestations of heart failure in the early postoperative period, but didn’t affect the perioperative mortality and major morbidity rates. MIAVR led to reduction in postoperative blood loss and perioperative red blood cell transfusion rate. Most severe complications occurred in frail patients older than 75 years, and in those with extensive aortic annular calcification.CONCLUSION. MIAVR was the safe and reproducible surgical intervention and rarely led to significant complications in low-risk patients. Prolonged CPB time adversely affected the frequency of significant complications, especially in elderly patients. Although, selected high risk patients might benefit with MIAVR.


2007 ◽  
Vol 83 (2) ◽  
pp. 586-591 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandro Castiglioni ◽  
Alessandro Verzini ◽  
Federico Pappalardo ◽  
Nicola Colangelo ◽  
Lucia Torracca ◽  
...  

Heart ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 105 (Suppl 2) ◽  
pp. s10-s15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marjan Jahangiri ◽  
Azhar Hussain ◽  
Enoch Akowuah

Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement (MIAVR) is defined as a surgical aortic valve replacement which involves smaller chest incisions as opposed to full sternotomy. It is performed using cardiopulmonary bypass with cardiac arrest. It benefits from potential advantages of a less invasive procedure. To date, over 14 000 MIAVR have been reported in the literature. Due to heterogeneity of the studies, different surgical techniques and mainly the non-randomised nature of these studies comparing MIAVR with conventional aortic valve replacement, it is difficult to draw definitive conclusions. The two main techniques of MIAVR are mini-sternotomy and right anterior mini-thoracotomy. Both techniques with other less common forms of MIAVR will be discussed in this review. The advantages, disadvantages and surgical pitfalls will be discussed. Some of the advantages include shorter intensive care and hospital stay, reduced perioperative blood loss, less pain, improved respiratory function and cosmesis. The possible disadvantage of longer bypass and cross-clamp times may be counter balanced by the recent sutureless and rapid deployment valves. Despite some of the benefits, MIAVR has not been adopted by a significant proportion of the surgeons possibly related to the learning curve and requirements for re-training. As MIAVR becomes more common, randomised trials comparing this technique with transcatheter aortic valve implantation is warranted. In addition, assessing quality of life including return to work and functional capacity is needed.


2016 ◽  
Vol 40 (12) ◽  
pp. E280-E291 ◽  
Author(s):  
Reto Basciani ◽  
Felix Kröninger ◽  
Erich Gygax ◽  
Hansjörg Jenni ◽  
David Reineke ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document