Catheter-directed foam sclerotherapy with tumescence of the great saphenous vein versus ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy: A randomized controlled trial

2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 84-91 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorgete B dos Santos ◽  
Walter Campos Júnior ◽  
Rina MP Porta ◽  
Juliana Puggina ◽  
Daniela FT da Silva ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Success Rate ◽  
Saphenous Vein ◽  
Great Saphenous Vein ◽  
Success Rates ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Foam Sclerotherapy ◽  
Number Of Patients

Objectives To compare the effectiveness of two foam sclerotherapy techniques of the great saphenous vein. Methods Fifty subjects with varicose veins, edema, and great saphenous vein incompetence (diameter 6–10 mm) were randomly categorized into two equal groups and were treated with different foam sclerotherapy techniques: A (usual ultrasound-guided) and B (catheter-directed with tumescence). Concomitant phlebectomy was performed in all patients. Patients were seen on days 7 and 28, and at six and 12 months. The primary outcomes were the full success rate of the treated great saphenous vein and the number of patients who required retreatment sessions performed at 28-day follow-up. The secondary-assisted outcomes were the full success rates of the treated great saphenous vein after the retreatment sessions at six- and 12-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes were changes in quality of life and side effects and complications of the intervention. In case of reflux, retreatment sessions were performed at 28 days and six months in both groups. Results Full success rate of the treated great saphenous vein was 36% in group A vs. 80% in group B ( p = 0.012) and the number of patients who required retreatment sessions were n = 14 in group A vs. n = 3 in group B at 28-day follow-up ( p = 0.002). Both were statistically significant. At six and 12 months, the success rates were not statistically significant between the groups. Complication rates were similar between the groups. Quality of life improved in both groups with statistical difference ( p < 0.001). Conclusions Catheter-directed foam sclerotherapy with tumescence was better than usual ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy as it reached higher full success rate of the treated great saphenous vein and as a lower number of patients required retreatment sessions in the short-term. Both methods proved to be safe and improved the quality of life.

Impact of Great Saphenous Vein Foam Sclerotherapy on Quality of Life and Photoplethysmography Findings in Chronic Venous Insufficiency

2020 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. 369-375
Author(s):  
Felipe Coelho Neto ◽  
Rodrigo Gomes de Oliveira ◽  
Fernando Thomazinho ◽  
Anna Paula Weinhardt Batista ◽  
Iruena Moraes Kessler
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Saphenous Vein ◽  
Chronic Venous Insufficiency ◽  
Venous Insufficiency ◽  
Great Saphenous Vein ◽  
Foam Sclerotherapy

Improvements of deep vein reflux following radiofrequency ablation for saphenous vein incompetence

2016 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suh Min Kim ◽  
In Mok Jung ◽  
Jung Kee Chung
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Radiofrequency Ablation ◽  
Treatment Outcomes ◽  
Saphenous Vein ◽  
Great Saphenous Vein ◽  
Deep Vein ◽  
Vein Reflux

Objectives The aim of this study was to describe the changes of deep vein reflux after radiofrequency ablation for great saphenous vein incompetence. Method The data on 139 limbs which were treated with radiofrequency ablation for great saphenous vein incompetence were prospectively collected and reviewed. Results Deep vein reflux was present in 43 of 139 limbs (30.9%). There were no significant differences in the rate of successful closure, the incidence of procedure-related complications, and the improvements of symptoms and quality of life between the limbs with or without deep vein reflux. With a mean follow-up of 5.9 months, the peak reflux velocity and duration of reflux were improved in all limbs with deep vein reflux and it was completely corrected in 13 limbs (30.2%) after radiofrequency ablation. Conclusions The presence of deep vein reflux does not affect the treatment outcomes of radiofrequency ablation for great saphenous vein incompetence and is improved in all patients. Deep vein reflux is not a barrier to performing radiofrequency ablation.

Which endovenous ablation method does offer a better long-term technical success in the treatment of the incompetent great saphenous vein? Review

Vascular ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. 649-657 ◽  
Author(s):  
Renata Balint ◽  
Akos Farics ◽  
Krisztina Parti ◽  
Laszlo Vizsy ◽  
Jozsef Batorfi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiofrequency Ablation ◽  
Laser Ablation ◽  
Saphenous Vein ◽  
Great Saphenous Vein ◽  
Success Rates ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Foam Sclerotherapy ◽  
Endovenous Laser Ablation

Objective The aim of this review article was to evaluate the long-term technical success rates of the known endovenous ablation procedures in the treatment of the incompetence of the great saphenous vein. Methods A literature search was conducted in the PubMed-database until the 5 January 2016. All publications with four to five years follow-up were eligible. Meta-analysis was performed by the IVhet-model. Results Eight hundred and sixty-two unique publications were found; 17 of them were appropriate for meta-analysis. Overall, 1420 limbs were included in the trial, 939 for endovenous laser ablation, 353 for radiofrequency ablation and 128 for ultrasound guided foam sclerotherapy. Overall, technical success rates were 84.8% for endovenous laser ablation, 88.7% for radiofrequency ablation and 32.8% for ultrasound guided foam sclerotherapy. There were no significant differences between endovenous laser ablation, radiofrequency ablation and ultrasound guided foam sclerotherapy regarding the great saphenous vein reopening ( p = 0.66; OR: 0.22; 95% of CI: 0.08–0.62 for radiofrequency ablation vs. endovenous laser ablation; p = 0.96; OR: 0.11; 95% of CI: 0.06–0.20 for endovenous laser ablation vs. ultrasound guided foam sclerotherapy; p = 0.93; OR: 3.20; 95% of CI: 0.54–18.90 for ultrasound guided foam sclerotherapy vs. radiofrequency ablation). Conclusion Both endovenous laser ablation and radiofrequency ablation are efficient in great saphenous vein occlusion on the long term. Lacking long-conducted large trials, the efficacy and reliability of ultrasound guided foam sclerotherapy to treat great saphenous vein-reflux is not affirmed.

scholarly journals LEV 12. Small-Diameter Recanalization of the Great Saphenous Vein After Ultrasound-Guided Foam Sclerotherapy: Three-Year Follow-up

2019 ◽  
Vol 70 (5) ◽  
pp. e173
Author(s):  
Jean-Luc Gillet ◽  
Michel Lausecker ◽  
Claudine Hamel-Desnos ◽  
François André Allaert
Keyword(s):  
Saphenous Vein ◽  
Great Saphenous Vein ◽  
Small Diameter ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Foam Sclerotherapy

Midterm Outcome of Mechanochemical Endovenous Ablation for the Treatment of Great Saphenous Vein Insufficiency

2016 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 149-155 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marianne E. Witte ◽  
Suzanne Holewijn ◽  
Ramon R. van Eekeren ◽  
Jean-Paul de Vries ◽  
Clark J. Zeebregts ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Saphenous Vein ◽  
Great Saphenous Vein ◽  
Clinical Severity ◽  
Time Intervals ◽  
Disease Specific ◽  
Anatomic Success

Purpose: To report the midterm results of mechanochemical ablation (MOCA) for treating great saphenous vein (GSV) insufficiency. Methods: In a 1-year period, 85 consecutive patients (median age 51.4 years; 71 women) undergoing MOCA with polidocanol in 104 limbs were enrolled in a prospective registry. The patients were evaluated at baseline and during follow-up (4 weeks and 1, 2, and 3 years) using duplex ultrasound, the CEAP (clinical, etiologic, anatomic and pathophysiologic) classification, the Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS), the RAND Short Form 36-Item Health Survey (RAND-SF36), and the Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire (AVVQ). Primary outcome measures were clinical and anatomic success. Secondary outcome measures included general and disease-specific quality of life and reinterventions. Results: Technical success (99%) was achieved in all but 1 patient in whom technical problems with the device led to conversion to another method for treatment of 2 limbs. After a median follow-up of 36 months (interquartile range 12.5, 46.3), recanalization occurred in 15 (15%) of 102 successfully treated vein segments. Anatomic success was 92%, 90%, and 87% after 1, 2, and 3 years, respectively. The VCSS improved at all time intervals compared to the preprocedure median. The clinical success at 3 years was 83%. The AVVQ and RAND-SF36 scores showed an improvement at all time intervals compared to baseline values. Between 12 and 36 months, however, a significant deterioration was observed in VCSS, which was accompanied by worsening of disease-specific and general quality of life. Conclusion: In the longest follow-up of MOCA to date, this study shows MOCA to be an effective treatment modality for GSV insufficiency at midterm follow-up, but clinical results seem to drop over time.

Study of quality of life in patients with varicose vein after radiofrequency ablation and ultrasound guided foam sclerotherapy

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Satyendra K. TIWARY ◽  
Sartaz ALAM ◽  
Pankaj SUREKA ◽  
Puneet KUMAR ◽  
Ajay K. KHANNA
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Radiofrequency Ablation ◽  
Varicose Vein ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Foam Sclerotherapy

scholarly journals LEV 3. Outcomes of Ultrasound-Guided Catheter-Directed Foam Sclerotherapy With or Without Perivenous Tumescent Enhancement in the Treatment of Great Saphenous Vein Reflux

2018 ◽  
Vol 68 (5) ◽  
pp. e127
Author(s):  
Pharawee Prayoonhong ◽  
Suthas Horsirimanont ◽  
Wiwat Tirapanich ◽  
Sopon Jirasiritum ◽  
Surasak Leela-Udomlipi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Saphenous Vein ◽  
Great Saphenous Vein ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Foam Sclerotherapy ◽  
Vein Reflux
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document